Talk:Organizational ombudsman

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Suggestions section?[edit]

Would this article be a good place to put suggestions for implementing ombudsman systems in existing organizations from related research literature, or should that kind of content go towards a new article? I am inclined towards the former as this article is still a Start-class one. QRep2020 (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Organizational Ombudsman," listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Organizational Ombudsman,. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 24#Organizational Ombudsman, until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of promotional...[edit]

Maybe ombudsmen are useless figureheads used to tick boxes.

Not sure they're helpful or just one more cost, here to feign a problem is being taken care of....without being taken care of, even if not directly employed, by investigations towards which they work...

What's the point of investigating, for investigating? How doe they investigate? 2A01:E34:EC12:36C0:551E:E888:63FC:D34E (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]