Talk:Danielle Egnew

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 18 June 2005, see discussion.
Keep, 23 October 2013, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion or major overhaul of psychic section?[edit]

The psychic section lacks a neutral tone, and the only sources provided to verify her psychic claims are her official websites. I've already tagged the entire article as being like a resume; it is little more than a vague listing of her accomplishments, with links to external sites, and the psychic section is no exception. I vote to delete the psychic section unless someone is able to verify the psychic claims with a reliable 3rd party source and makes the tone more neutral.== Deletion or major overhaul of psychic section? == The psychic section lacks a neutral tone, and the only sources provided to verify her psychic claims are her official websites. I've already tagged the entire article as being like a resume; it is little more than a vague listing of her accomplishments, with links to external sites, and the psychic section is no exception. I vote to delete the psychic section unless someone is able to verify the psychic claims with a reliable 3rd party source and makes the tone more neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon1930 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmillerche (talk • contribs) [reply]

FLAG: WIKI PAGE HAZING - Tags in Psychic section removed[edit]

Subjective tagging in "Psychic" section removed. This wiki article is not intended to prove or disprove psychic ability but to report on the work of the individual. The tagwords "alleged" and "claims" throughout the section denote information properly. Danielle Egnew is a publicized media personality who additionally works in the paranormal and psychic field. As of September 11 2011 Google reports 22,500 media, television, blog and radio websites documenting this claim when searched using "Danielle Egnew Psychic". WHOIS reports that only four of these 22,500 websites belong to "Danielle Egnew Spiritual Advisory". Please refrain from misusing tags.

rewrite page[edit]

Give me a couple weeks, I'm going to tackle this page rewrite. Citations and everything.Sgerbic (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page Rewrite[edit]

As Brandon1930 pointed out before his contribution to the talk page was wiped out by Tht890, an overhaul was needed for the page. Multiple issues existed with over half the citations listed, which went to either broken links, or the page referenced did not support the content it was sourcing. The citation style was updated to meet with Wikipedia's citation format, and the unusable broken links, as well as non WP:RS sources were removed. The psychic section contained no secondary sources, and the content could not be reliably sourced per WP:RS. The article has been rewritten with to be more WP:NPOV, and cleaned up with a more encyclopedic tone. I have removed the notability guideline tag for this page, as the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO per criterion 1, as her professional work as a musician, producer, etc has "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself."Nmillerche (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Damn Nmillerche you beat me too it. The page looks much more like a Wikipedia page now. Sgerbic (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the section has been re-added, but this time with proper citations. I made some slight changes to the wording to state the claims in a NPOV, as well as to the order of the sections, seeing how the sources from the Psychic section appear to flow from the subject's film and radio career, vice the opposite. Also, discussing the Norma Lopez case, we need to be very careful to differentiate between speaking in the voice of the claimant, as opposed to speaking in Wikipedia's voice. I have adjusted the wording accordingly. Nmillerche (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 deletion request[edit]

Why is this article nominted for deletion? Cap020570 (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the discussion has been initiated at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Danielle_Egnew_(2nd_nomination) concerning the subject's eligibility under notability guidelines. Nmillerche (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Danielle Egnew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danielle Egnew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017145047/http://tinstarrecords.com/about/danielle-egnew-ceo/ to http://tinstarrecords.com/about/danielle-egnew-ceo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]