This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amy Coney Barrett article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Archives:1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 120 days
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. Parts of this page are related to abortion, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 10,943,787 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report5 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Should the current lock/protection status be reduced back down to semi-protected silverlock?[edit]
All the other Justices are at the semi-protected status right now with the exception of Barrett despite the fact that as of now Justices like Thomas and Alito probably have more bad press and hate coming to them. I understand having kept it at this status during her hearings and for the subsequent months afterwards, but I feel it should probably be brought lower. LosPajaros (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a year late, but I agree with this. Why is this article still under extended protection? DocZach (talk) 22:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 October 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please update citation 143 by Vile, John R. It does not need to link to the wayback machine. The article cited is still live at https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/roman-catholic-diocese-of-brooklyn-v-cuomo/
MTSU updated their first amendment URL structure and implemented a redirect from the old URL to the new one linked above. It's an honorable project and they would appreciate maintaining the live citation. Thank you, Tpmeredith (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Still kept the wayback archive just in case, but I've set url-status to live so that the live link is shown first. Liu1126 (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: WP:COPDEF Hyphenation Expert (talk) 12:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
