Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Electricity/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 16:58, 22 May 2007.

Electricity[edit]

--Eptypes 09:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball oppose. No references, too short and there's clearly lots of work to do. Eptypes, did you ask the article's main authors as to whether it was suitable for FAC? CloudNine 09:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no references. Resurgent insurgent 09:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Sorry, I can see you're a new user and obviously keen, which is great. However, FAC is generally something discussed extensively prior to coming here by active contributors. The article lacks any inline referencing (a big task I think) and there's a rather obtrusive list in the lead. I suspect this won't make it this time round. I will keep a lookout in case there is substantial changecheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 09:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per 1c and 1a, with a call for WP:SNOW. The editor is new, so I recommend he use the Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User programme and learn the ropes so to speak. LuciferMorgan 10:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, unreferenced. -- Phoenix2 16:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Obviously this one is not close, it also appears to have gone Summary Style crazy. Quadzilla99 18:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - crowded lead section, very hectic, and underveloped for an article of this importance.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 13:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Same - no ref. Also, a subject like this could use more detail. Universe=atom^{•Talk•Contributions•} 10:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Such information appears to be located in the various subarticles, but as Quadzilla mentioned this one is over-summarized. -- Phoenix2 ^{(talk, review)} 19:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Absolutely not. Axl 19:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.