User talk:Oseland

Welcome!

Hello, Oseland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Alexi marmot associates, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paste ^Talk 15:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alexi marmot associates[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alexi marmot associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paste ^Talk 15:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Workplace consulting[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Workplace consulting, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workplace consulting. Thank you. Post occupancy evaluation is also at risk, mostly for self-referencing reason (see WP:RS and WP:COI for the problems associated with citing own publications). NVO (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Workplace strategy[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Workplace strategy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workplace strategy. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm not really sure how to solve the problem. To me, this is an essay and not an encyclopedia article. You might ask for help on the articles for deletion topic page, that discussion will run at least 7 days before closing, you might get better help there than I can give you. Woogee (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontested move[edit]

Hi, I think you have a typo in your request, read the red warning. Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 13:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Chaplin moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Nick Chaplin. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria showing lack of significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Slowdive's related reportings.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am an infrequent editor on Wikipedia. Is there anyway I seeking the help and expertise of established Wikipedia authors? Re the content, Nick Chaplin is the only member of Slowdive without his own page, and I assumed this would set a precedent for his page. Oseland (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Chaplin (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Chaplin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oseland! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nick Chaplin[edit]

Hello, Oseland. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nick Chaplin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nick Chaplin[edit]

Hello, Oseland. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nick Chaplin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]