User talk:Ngebendi
Welcome![edit]
|
May 2009[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as the edit you made to Primeval. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 08:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Dresden Files groups, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Changes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Skin Game (novel) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skin Game (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skin Game (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ElHef (Meep?) 03:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Ngebendi. Regarding this edit you made, I answered with this edit (a WP:Dummy edit). Flyer22 (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- I replied on my talk page, and will leave a WP:Dummy edit in the Virginity article edit history that lets others know that you answered my response. Flyer22 (talk) 12:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:American magazine writers[edit]
Category:American magazine writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I've reverted your edit at this article. The content that existed prior to the redirect can be found in the history (as with this link, for example). Leaving the content under the redirect causes some problems, such as including the redirect in categories reserved for articles. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks! UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
August 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm HMSSolent. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Masks (novel) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 07:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cold case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Skin Game (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 20:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Huon[edit]
You can probably safely ignore anything that moron says about the novel Skin Game. It's clear Huon doesn't bother doing even minimal research on anything before attacking pages. I've added more sourced information to the article now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.208.235 (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crossbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Pueblo/Sacred Clowns[edit]
No strong objection, but we should just be echoing the sources here. What do the reference books call them? The Parsons and Beals source (the only one that's accessible and uses the term in any way) refers to them as "Pueblo clowns". --McGeddon (talk) 07:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Harry Dresden, Wizard[edit]
I looked into it earlier today. There was a discussion (with very few participants, which annoys me) and a consensus to move the categories. The category Fictional wizards has thus been blanked out. While I disagree with that (I think there's a marked distinction between wizards and magicians, that can be easily applied to all fictional works, even if they make a good point about rolling together 'sorcerers' and 'magic-users' 'conjurers'), I think it would be wrong to leave Dresden as the only character in that category to make that point.
If you're inclined to get this changed back to a greater level of specificity, I will be happy to work towards that end with you. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'll take care of getting it started as soon as I get the chance. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 22:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- I began looking into it, and I believe it's going to be an uphill battle. There seems to be a long-standing consensus to use the word "Magician" to refer to anyone who deals with magic of any sort. I found that the article Wizard is a disambiguation page, with the first line being:
Wizard is another name for a Magician (fantasy).
- In addition, the article Magician is also a disambiguation, with the very first entry being for individuals such as Aleister Crowley, who purport(ed) to be real-life wizards. Even though the article List of magicians lists primarily stage magicians, all of the other articles seem to adhere to the more formal definition of the term (one who uses magic), rather than the commonly held meaning of a stage magician. I'm still willing to argue to change this, but the scope would be much broader than a single category, and I get the impression that it would be a difficult fight. If consistency is to be achieved, it would be easier to change the name of List of magicians to List of stage magicians. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 21:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with you completely. I don't see any good reason other than dictionary-definition pedantry (which is against policy) to not call magic-users in a fantastic setting "Wizards". The common meaning of the word is "one who uses magic", while "Magician" commonly refers to a stage illusionist. I'm all for getting this changed, as it's a clear policy to use the common meaning of terms here on WP. I just think it's going to be a fight, as it seems the people who've dealt with this issue previously are predominantly on the other side. Perhaps we should do a little good-faith canvassing and try to figure out what the consensus is among those who edit fantasy-fiction articles, and see if we're in the minority first. If so, I don't see the point in pushing the issue (because we then become the pedantic ones), but if there is a clear consensus that wizard is the term of choice for one who uses magic in a fantasy setting (as I believe there is), we can move forward. Let's just be sure to invite those who disagree with us to voice their opinions as well, otherwise we'd be violating policy.
- One thing I want to say, and to say gently, is that I believe in the meantime we should leave the categorization of Dresden be unless and until we can get the category name changed. We stand a better chance of success if we appear to be willing to work with those who disagree with us, and we can avoid any accusations of edit warring. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 14:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm thinking that I'm going to bow out of this one. The more I look into it, the more daunting it seems. The precedent of referring to wizards in fantasy as Magician (fantasy) goes back to 2006 and has had a changing set of supporters over time. They've managed to block all attempts so far, and I don't think they would fail to block ours, too. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 23:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Harry Dresden may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- As of the end of ''[[Skin Game (novel)|Skin Game'', Harry has given birth to a spirit of intellect, formed from the
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Skin Game (novel). Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)
DRN[edit]
Hi. Pings don't seem to work with my signature, so I just wanted to let you know that there is a question for you at the DRN. Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 14:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Joel Brand[edit]
Please stop changing the lead sentence. You've left it several times making no sense. "... the proposal was thwarted by the British government. They [the British govt} arrested Brand in Turkey, where he had gone to propose Eichmann's offer to the Jewish Agency, and [they: the British govt] put an end to it by leaking details to the media ..." SlimVirgin (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dresden Files characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Changes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Afd templates[edit]
Please don't remove AFD templates from articles until the discussion is closed. It was perfectly legitimate to start a new deletion debate; it'll be closed in due time. —Cryptic 00:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dresden Files characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Changes and Dead Beat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 12:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 12:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not move the article again without a proper WP:RM. Article titles do not have to "match" other similar titles concerning a parenthetical disambiguation. For example, North Dakota doesn't need a parenthetical disambiguation to match Georgia (U.S. state) just because Georgia has one. Each title is determined on the basis of WP:COMMONNAME and WP:AT. Adding an unnecessary parenthetical disambiguation to an article title just to match some other title is unnecessary and inconsistent with Wikipedia's policy on article titles. If you disagree, you are welcome to start a talk page discussion per WP:RM, but please do not move the article again without discussion. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 20:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 21:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Aoidh (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Edit War Warning[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)