User talk:M Waleed

Battle of Bahadur post moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Bahadur post. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to create articles in the drafts namespace first and then submit them for review. @AfghanParatrooper19891: Can you also take a look at this article to see if there's anything off about it? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, check it , there's ten sources and I think it's enough to be moved back Waleed (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from some grammatical issues, there is nothing wrong with the article. I think it simply requires copyediting. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 10:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, review the page now brother and shift it back, moreover I'm unable to submit the draft on my device as it's facing a glitch so if you can't shift it back then submit it for review Waleed (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't see it passing WP:N. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, reason? There are battles with way smaller tolls and this one was a major one in the conflict Waleed (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, brother Battle of Tiger Hill, Battle of Tololing and Battle of Point 4875 between Pakistan and India have smaller casualties. This was the only shootdown of Pakistani aircraft in siachen. This was battle in which the largest casualties of officers occurred in siachen. This brought Pakistan to accept indian demands. What reason you present for non notability. Waleed (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sig/in-depth coverage. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib brother,See the articles I've mentioned and their length about the battles. Waleed (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, now brother and also see my previous reply Waleed (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to submit it for review if you think it's ready. However, I may not pass it because I don't feel it's ready yet. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder. Let's just keep the 'brothers' and 'sisters' out of our discussions. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, if you don't like I wouldn't use such terms for you even though I believe in mutual brotherhood and about the article, I think it's enough and you can see precedents in other articles of battles that I gave Waleed (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tololing, for example has a singular paragraph whereas I've given like 4 paragraphs Waleed (talk) 11:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, please respond to the precedent I gave so that I can proceed Waleed (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]