User talk:Keebruce

March 2023[edit]

Why did you reactivate the edit request (without supplying the requested reliable sources)? M.Bitton (talk) 02:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The site autoblocked my response, most likely because the 6 APA citations I provided contained links, I'm assuming. I left a message on the False positives page so hopefully it gets resolved soon. Keebruce (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thank you for the explanation. M.Bitton (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone on the false positives page decided to archive or remove the report I made and I'm not sure why. Is there another place I can provide my citations without an autoblocker (that you know of) that gets what I need onto the page without the chance of someone deciding to discriminately remove my hard work and effort? I don't know what to do to get the citations on there at this point because of the autoblocker. Keebruce (talk) 01:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was malformed (that's why it was removed). Try again, but this time make sure you preview the report before publishing it (and don't edit the subject title). M.Bitton (talk) 02:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright... how should I properly form this then? I'm new to Wikipedia's system of editing, but I thought simply providing a detailed explanation and some APA sources would be enough. Keebruce (talk) 10:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]