User:Civilizededucation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
:HELLO friends. Warm welcome. Please use my talk page to inform me about any posts that you may want me to see, just keep the issues where they belong. I try to be as clear and concise as possible on all issues, and am trying to familiarize myself with WP:CIVIL and other Wiki policies and guidelines. I also want to keep focus only on building a good encyclopedia.

The thing I have learned on Wikipedia is that your peace of mind is more important than....whatever. Take it easy..... and you can enjoy.

The electricity supply in my area is rather erratic. Please excuse if I unexpectedly disappear from some activities in which I am involved.

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.

Jimmy Wales [1][2][3]

Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

In Thought du Jour Harold Geneen has stated:[4]

The reliability of the person giving you the facts is as important as the facts themselves. Keep in mind that facts are seldom facts, but what people think are facts, heavily tinged with assumptions.

Founding principles of Wikipedia


Giechburg
The Giechburg is a partly reconstructed hilltop castle located in the town of Scheßlitz in Bavaria, Germany. There was a hilltop fort at the site from at least Neolithic times, and the castle enters written history in 1125. In 1390, it entered the possession of the prince-bishops of Bamberg, and its history thereafter is closely allied to the bishopric and the city of Bamberg. The castle was destroyed and rebuilt several times over the subsequent centuries before undergoing extensive redevelopment between 1599 and 1609. It became less useful to the prince-bishops over the subsequent centuries however, and eventually fell into ruin. After a period in the 19th and 20th centuries in the hands of the von Giech family, the castle was eventually acquired by the district of Bamberg in 1971 and reconstructed as a conference and hospitality centre. This 2021 aerial photograph shows the Giechburg viewed from the north, with the village of Peulendorf in the background.Photograph credit: Reinhold Möller
curmudgeonThis user is a
curmudgeon
This user enjoys watching pointless animations.
Burrito ergo sum I fart, therefore I am.
This user is male, and as such, he would prefer to be addressed and/or referred to with masculine pronouns.

Tip of the day


Check your work before you save, using Preview

When you edit a page, you can use the Preview button (located right next to the Save page button) to see in advance what your edits will look like. This lets you check your work periodically without filling up the page history by making lots of smaller edits. The preview function can also help you avoid mistakes, such as when using an unfamiliar type of wiki markup. The preview will appear together with the edit box you have been working in (either above or below it, however you prefer).

An even faster way to preview a page is with the keyboard shortcut ⇧ Shift+alt+P.

Read more:
I am just a human being like everyone else and like to be known that way.Civilizededucation (talk)
I like to use this page as a sort of navigation hub and cheatsheet for Wikipedia, so you can ignore the link farm etc. below.

Link farm and other knick knack

The flowers of Russian comfrey
user page designing
WP:MARKUP
WP:MOVE
BOLD
IGNORE
NPOV
POV
RS
V
OR
BITE
BULLY
OWN
WP:GANG
WP:GAME
EDIT NINJA
User:Civilizededucation/test
User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox
User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox2
User:Civilizededucation/stuffbox
Wikipedia:Plagiarism
Tips
Wikipedia:Tip of the day/October 19, 2006
Wikipedia:Template messages
Wikipedia:Writing better articles
Help:Wikitable
User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo
egl
special:Tags
Still frame from the video transmission of Neil Armstrong stepping onto the surface of the Moon at 02:56 UTC on July 21, 1969. An estimated 500 million people worldwide watched this event, the largest television audience for a live broadcast at that time.[5][6]
HOW TO CITE
Template:Citation/core
Deletion of articles
WP:HOWTO
article Talk page templates
Wikipedia:Cheatsheet
Wikipedia:How to edit a page
Wikipedia:Article development
Wikipedia:Manual of Style
Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia
VAN
BLP
Templates
Help Templates
Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates
Template:Tmbox
Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace
Wikipedia:Userboxes
help HTML
WP:Images
Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial
Wikipedia:List of free online resources
Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial
[[Category:Wikipedia features]
Help:Contents/Site map
WP:Glossary
tools
link search tool
Wikipedia:Tools
Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight

Editing Help

Tick

npp

pp

akt

References

  1. ^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.
  2. ^ http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html
  3. ^ Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo
  4. ^ Harold Geneen in his "Thought du Jour", cited by Michael Kesterton in The Globe and Mail on February 20, 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of information.
  5. ^ "Manned Space Chronology: Apollo_11". spaceline.org. Retrieved 2008-02-06.
  6. ^ "Apollo Anniversary: Moon Landing "Inspired World"". nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2008-02-06.