Talk:Vintage guitar

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

User comments[edit]

I removed the delete tag. Perhaps there is some POV in the article, but a 'vintage guitar' is a general used term, see old guitars on Ebay. If you disagree on the tendency of the content, strip out the bias, but this is a relevant subjects equal to vintage cars, post stamp collecting or comic book collecting. 83.87.74.107 (talk) 08:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KRAVITZ

"The breakthrough of Lenny Kravitz, regarded the first retro rock artist, which openly declared his affinity for old equipment following the tendency of many blues musicians by playing on tube amplifiers and other old equipment, was one of the important reason for this development."

This is a total, absolute and complete pile of shit --IRONY-POLICE (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, this "article" is a pile of garbage. There is no reason whatsoever that it should exist independent of Vintage musical equipment, which itself is pointless in multiple ways — FFI, see Talk:Vintage musical equipment#Nonsense.

As for the usual plaintive whinging about how "but this is a relevant subject!!" — relevant to exactly WHAT, pray? — that is at best a case for this being a dictionary entry. For starters, note that NOWHERE has ANY attempt been made to explain W.T.F. is meant by the term vintage. Before someone foolishly suggests, I'll reiterate that there is NOTHING in Vintage (design) that delineates the term in any way relevant to this wad of factoids.

As with that other article, fluff about "rarity" and "value" is fundamentally irrelevant — such fanboy arm-waving is much more appropriate (aleit still useless) in Collecting or such — and should be deleted.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the now-invalid source (url=http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/4271811/Sound-investments.html) for the "guitars are a great investment" claim, not that it was good in its day. I'd expect The Wall Street Journal or maybe Fortune rather than a tabloid.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]