Talk:Taco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where are Birria Tacos in the Variations part of this article?[edit]

Like they taste amazing and are one of the most liked Taco variants! 2003:EA:4F4F:CFC4:5CEE:5F71:F590:D30E (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Just added. Geoff | Who, me? 18:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ty 91.17.132.99 (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Costa Rica and other countries...[edit]

So I guess we know the taco originated in Mexico and is also popular in the USA. But I am on Reddit a lot and in some Costa Rican subreddit, tourists keep mentioning a joint called (I think) "SpecTACOlar". Do they have their own taco traditions or is it just a popular dish there like in the USA? Should any other countries be mentioned in this article? YellowAries2010 (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US[edit]

According to a court ruling discussed by the attorney Steve Letho in his Youtube channel (video is titled "Court Rules:A Taco is A 'Sandwich'"), a taco is now officially classified as [Sandwich]. I am not allowed to edit this into the Wikipedia article, but others might. If so, please do.--2003:D6:371C:E700:60DE:13C2:F30D:F893 (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on which sources have covered this, this may not be WP:DUE for mention in this article. The more and higher quality the sources provided, the more detail becomes DUE to include. signed, Rosguill talk 15:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the implication of your statement? 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 22:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read the article, (WP:DUE)? To quote: "Wikipedia should not present a [fact] as if a view held by a small minority is as significant as the majority view. Views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views (such as the flat Earth). Giving undue weight to the view of a significant minority or including that of a tiny minority might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute. Wikipedia aims to present competing views in proportion to their representation in reliable sources on the subject." One statement by one YouTube personality about one court's view is likely such a tiny minority. Geoff | Who, me? 22:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but are court decisions treated as "small minority views" in the US? I am puzzled.
If you need a source, start with this one: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/18/dining/taco-sandwich-indiana-mexico.html
I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]