Talk:Pubic hair fetishism

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gallery?[edit]

The photos in the gallery section of this page are completely unnecessary, except for the fetishists themselves who come to this page to get their rocks off. There's a single photo at the top of the page illustrating what pubic hair is. That should be enough. 68.77.21.60 (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I also think that most of the material in this article has anything to do with fetishism.Enthusiast (talk) 10:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphilia?[edit]

I don't really grasp what makes this a 'paraphilia'. Pubic hair grows naturally and it used to be the norm to leave it on. I'm quite young myself (generation Y, i.e. generation with a significant population suffering 'hair phobia'), but I don't see what makes this unusual. Witproduct (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First painting depicting pubic hair[edit]

It's not the one mentioned in the article but Death and the maiden from Hans Baldung in 1517. Wikitom2 (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fetish[edit]

In the article on Fetish, there are no descriptions of body parts being a fetish. In this article there are descriptions of all sorts of things, but none of them seem to be the definition of pubic hair fetishism. It may be a nelogism. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 22:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]