Talk:Enabling

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Addictions and recovery High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Addictions and recovery, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of addiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Addictions and recoveryWikipedia:WikiProject Addictions and recoveryTemplate:WikiProject Addictions and recoveryaddiction and recovery articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not a medical term[edit]

Medical science recognizes no such thing as "enabling". Most would call it simply caring. Has its origins in AA propaganda. 24.36.78.185 (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medical science has it´s limit. It is not a science about of all aspects of human behavior. Compare with a car; the repair manual for the car do not give not all information about cars, how people use them, their impact on the society etc. Dala11a (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has some currency in some psychology-related fields, e.g. counseling, and can be sourced as such. Agreed it's not a medical term (unless something's changed recently). The AA connection sounds plausible but needs sourcing. I think the positive use is probably original research, or at best a disused synonym of the main topic that points to. We needn't cover it here except as a WP:HATNOTE. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 14:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

I feel like this page is written in a style that does not conform to Wikipedia and could use some editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typative (talk • contribs) 21:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

This article needs to be split. This is completely useless. We do not cover two directly opposite meanings of a word in the same article, or there's no way to use it in links without confusing people. This has to forked and disambiguated. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 13:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe just remove the positive meaning and use a WP:Disambiguation hatnote to point to Empowerment. We don't need to cover other meanings of the word except as disambiguation either; the legislative sense "enabling act", for example. Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, after all. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 14:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gender[edit]

I wonder if that referenced sentence which gives an example of a husband being an addict, should be deleted. Wives can be addicts, aswell. GoodDay (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Narcissism and codependancy[edit]

Article needs to cover narcissism and codependancy as enabling. Codependancy is also about enabling narcissists not just enabling addicts.--Penbat (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enabling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080209121208/http://www.elinewberger.com/enabling.html to http://www.elinewberger.com/enabling.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Enabling leadership capacitant.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]