This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
Edward VII is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bagpipes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bagpipes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BagpipesWikipedia:WikiProject BagpipesTemplate:WikiProject BagpipesBagpipes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles
The infobox photo for most monarchs (at least British/Commonwealth monarchs) shows the monarch in some kind of regalia that is specific to the monarch. This is the case, for example, of George V, George VI, and, now, Elizabeth II.
This picture of Edward VII, on the other hand, looks like that of, say, an elective political figure of the age. (Or, put another way, it is more in the style of the picture for Elizabeth II that had been used until recently.)
Agree, the Fields portrait was the infobox image until a few years ago when someone changed it for some reason. I think that the infobox picture of a person should tell as much as possible about him/her (ex. a painter at the easel, a writer at their desk, etc.)
FilBenLeafBoy (Let's Talk!) 13:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree, the present king (Charles III) uses a similar style of portrait. The previous photograph is very high quality, unlike its blurry replacement. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The King’s portrait is likely to change in due course due to it being a photo from his years as Prince of Wales. Furthermore, he has been king for a short time so there aren’t yet any official portraits of him as king or in any regalia or uniform. All other monarchs are presented in some form of regalia or uniform and I think Edward VII’s portrait should follow. I think the previous image was much better and more accurately reflected his position. AKTC3 (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But it's lower resolution and worse contrast. The image in the introduction should be a high quality one. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We could just do a painting. Mitch199811 (talk) 04:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Paintings are not as accurate as photographs, which is why the latter are usually preferred. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk·contribs·email) 11:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Elizabeth II which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"The Edwardian era, which covered Edward's reign and was named after him, coincided with the start of a new century and heralded significant changes in technology and society, including steam turbine propulsion and the rise of socialism"[edit]
Is this in the body? I can't find it. If not, 'tis uncited. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to cut it. It's too long ago for me to remember the details of why I might have written that. DrKay (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's useful, would just reword it in the body and add a ref. Anywhere you know of that could give us a decent citation? Tim O'Doherty (talk) 23:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! HurricaneAndrew (444) 20:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]