Talk:CoinDesk

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

News vs Promotion[edit]

The Coindesk entry is a very good and also highly relevant given the interest in the technology. I changed the word "news" to promotion, even though promotion of bitcoin could very well include "news" on the subject. The issue and concern has more to do with "What is Journalism?" rather than "What is News?" In Journalism, "Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover." [1] and coindesk does not meet that standard. The purpose of coindesk is to promote bitcoin rather than report on news. --Lfrankblam 22:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

"The purpose of coindesk is to promote bitcoin" - is there a source for this claim? Ladislav Mecir (talk) 01:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion over at Talk:Ethereum#Coin_desk as to whether CoinDesk is an WP:RS. Editors claim it is not an RS due to it being a promotional site. Wanted to drop a note here in case anyone here was interested in chiming in.Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an RS Noticeboard discussion relating to if CoinDesk can be used as an RS on Ethereum, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#CoinDesk_and_CoinTelegraph_on_the_article_Ethereum . Please comment Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CoinDesk BPI change log[edit]

Just a heads up, that section is not meaningful to a reader. A table might be more meaningful which shows how the index has changed over time, or simply it could be omitted. --Lfrankblam (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus convention[edit]

@Jtbobwaysf: reverted my corrections and commented that the multiple sources I used were not reliable. I disagree. They also reverted the data so that it was incorrect again. I am glad that someone else added the changes back, but they got one date wrong so I corrected it. Please let us agree that correct information should be added to Wikipedia not incorrect information and if the incorrect information is there and not sourced (as it was), delete it all rather than remove sources in contention and revert back to incorrect data. Thank you. --YRG (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed more poor sources related to this. WE are not using press releases nor yahoo, which generate reprints other sources Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I used sources from the same websites used in other citations that existed in the article before my edit. There are multiple Bloomberg-sourced articles and there is an existing Yahoo article cited. If you do not believe Yahoo is a reputable source, then you should remove that existing article as well. YRG (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources discussion[edit]

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RfC_on_use_of_CoinDesk which may be of interest to people watching this page. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find this discussion. Does it still exist? --YRG (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]