Wikipedia talk:Most-missed articles

What am I looking at?[edit]

What do these numbers mean? Is it accurate? I guess It seems a bit strange that those would be the most searched things. Some of them highly specific and non-notable even in an off-wiki sense. Are these bot searches? ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated[edit]

It looks like about half of these pages actually do exist. Is it ok to remove them? This page needs more context. Craig Pemberton (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a good idea to remove them (after you check to make sure they do not lead to a disambig or wrong page). But maybe double check with the creator of this list and see what he thinks. Maybe there will be a more recent update when more of these articles are cleared. Calaka (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is what I noticed too, some of the articles have already been written up, perhaps they should be removed from this list... Lilaac (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But who will do it? :)

7h3 0N3 7h3 \/4Nl)4L5 Pl-l34R ( _t / _c ) 21:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frequency of requests[edit]

Some of the numbers #seem# rather excessive getting on for 3 000 requests #per day# for obscure topics. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page request[edit]

Hello! An editor made a request concerning User:A Nobody/List of traps in the Saw film series at User_talk:A_Nobody#listed_as_.231_requested_non-article and anyway any admin participants willing to unprotect have my permission to move my userspace article to the mainspace given the renewed enthusiasm for this article. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the article isn't going to be recreated anytime soon, the name has been salted. As to why: Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (3rd nomination) Josh Parris 05:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2008[edit]

Wait... "based on 149 days in year 2008", this is about 2008? Why is anything still linking to this page (or: why hasn't it been updated)? --82.171.13.139 (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with this, this list needs an update, if possible. Tazerdadog (talk) 09:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we could have a similar list generated for 2013. --Bejnar (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a more up-to-date list somewhere, if I can find it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

User:West.andrew.g/Popular redlinks All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]