The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Have taken this one up from a starter. Looking for constructive ctiticism. RM Gillespie 14:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ha Ha! I'm actually supporting! good article. --Pupster21Talk To Me 19:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meets the criteria and looks good at this point. Carom 03:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - you might want to get a couple of citations in the lead paragraphs, other than that, a brilliant article, your references section is one of the best I've seen. SGGH 14:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
