Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Unlike other recent nominations, I don't intend for this to head to FAC for a while. It's an interesting drive to take, and I think it's worthy of polishing up to the A-Class level. As for FAC, I have bigger fish for now.
- Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 09:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- First comment occurred: 21:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Comments by Dough4872
I have some concerns with the article before I can support it for A-class:
- Is it possible for major points of interest and termini to be listed in the infobox?
- Are there any traffic counts from more recently than 2008?
- "The road was originally known as the Sleeping Bear Dunes Park when he first opened it to the public in 1967.", is there a title that goes after "Sleeping Bear Dunes Park" such as road?
- why is "4.11 m" in brackets and not parentheses? Dough4872 21:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Will do.
- Not from any press sources. The NPS doesn't log traffic counts on this road like MDOT does with its state highways.
- Nope, that is the full, complete and total name, "Sleeping Bear Dunes Park".
- The conversion is an addition to the quote, and like any added content in a quotation, it's in brackets. Imzadi 1979 → 02:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Review by Rschen7754 |
---|
I plan to review this article. --Rschen7754 23:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Image check by Fredddie
|
---|
|
Review by TCN7JM
|
---|
Comments from TCN7JM
--TCN7JM 02:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
|
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.