Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Quiz/archive73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Q1441[edit]

On what list are Darren Sammy, Sulieman Benn and Dale Steyn no.s 1, 2 and 3? Ovshake (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a T20I record. Ovshake (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Best Figures in Matches Lost Sumant81 (talk) 12:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too easy. Yours. Ovshake (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One man's easy is another man's, "Aaaaggggggghhhh! For goodness sake why can't they ask questions that don't turn my forehead red and cause by blue veins to engorge in frustration, and my eyes to pop out? Wibble!!!!!" WillE (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1442[edit]

Two cricketers shared a last wicket partnership in a match which also happened to be the final match of one of the cricketers.The other cricketer went on to play one more match.They later stood as umpires in a series although not in the same match. Who are these cricketers in question? Sumant81 (talk) 19:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A professional footballer and a referee as well Sumant81 (talk) 13:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A pair of Englishmen Sumant81 (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A final hint before the answer is given out ,Early ashes late 19th century. Sumant81 (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Would have thought our English cricket experts would have got this .Will let it lie for some more time before I give out the answer Sumant81 (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing that no one is having a shot at this ,let me give away the answer .It is the pair of Dick Barlow & Mordecai Sherwin who also umpired in the 1899 Ashes Sumant81 (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1443[edit]

How many balls are there in an over? WillE (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Normally one. Historically it's round and red but increasingly it's white. Recently there have been trials of a pink one. Sometimes you might get two balls used in an over when a new ball is used or if one is changed because it's out of shape. I suppose, theoretically, you could use 6 in an over if the first 5 are lost after huge sixes. KingStrato (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
22 (see Vance et al)?

Correct enough, your highness, if you have a question to pose. WillE (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Real Q1443[edit]

Which Test cricketer achieved a feat that the Snickering Hound and his master couldn't? There may be multiple answers, I'll take the first correct answer - as long as I can verify it. KingStrato (talk) 19:54, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, a clue. First identify the Snickering Hound (hint - he's not "a brave knight or a king who's been crowned") then work out what he and his master tried to do (other than drive as fast as possible) and then work out which cricketer did it. KingStrato (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ian Botham. Johnlp (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reasoning? KingStrato (talk) 19:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Muttley and Dick Dastardly tried to walk from Land's End to John O'Groats and failed... but maybe not. I was merely trying to indicate that there is still a flicker of life left in this quiz. Perhaps. Johnlp (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure there is any life left. You know you're in trouble when the only question you can think of involves a cartoon dog. KingStrato (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It'll be the cricketer that took part in (and presumably won) the Dhaka to thingummy rally. Any one care to do a Michael Bevan or a Eoin Morgan and finish this off? WillE (talk) 21:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't the one that I had in mind but as I said - if I can verify it then I'll accept it. Another hint though. The incident I was thinking of happened in a cricket game. It doesn't relate to cars at all (it also doesn't involve a flying machine - and that might be more apt). KingStrato (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it help if I said the cricketer I was thinking of had a name that made him sound like a French red-nosed reindeer? Then you could just give me the reason? KingStrato (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Rudolph killed a pigeon. Poor old pigeon. Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Jacques Rudolph did Stop The Pigeon. Over to you sir. KingStrato (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1444[edit]

Take a look at this XI: Mike Atherton, Mark Taylor, Rahul Dravid, Alec Stewart, Sanjay Manjrekar, Simon Katich, Ian Healy, Carlton Baugh, Russel Arnold, Waqar Younis, Henry Olonga. On what basis have I selected it (ignoring my belief that you just can't have too many wicketkeepers)? Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm only interested in test cricket, it goes without saying I have an obsession with nice round numbers. It may be a slightly arbitrary basis for picking a team (I'm a proper selector), but these XI players (and no others) have 1 major record in common. Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 12:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The 400th wickets of the 11 bowlers who have taken 400 or more wickets Sumant81 (talk) 18:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is exactly right. Congratulations, and over to you. Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1445[edit]

A curiosity links Sanath Jayasuriya, John Whitehouse and one other. Sanath's part in this is well known; Whitehouse's part was similar to something that fed Clive Inman. The other makes it too easy, so who is it? WillE (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz. WillE (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
RIP Johnlp (talk) 09:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is it something to do with very fast centuries/half-centuries? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. The number 64 features. WillE (talk) 13:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The answer was that both Jayasuriya and Whitehouse both had bowling analyses of exactly 4-0-64-0. (T20 and The English County Championship) The other (or one of the others, possibly) was James Anderson. Bye, all. WillE (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How is Clive Inman relevant here ? Sumant81 (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, enquiring minds need to know. --Roisterer (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Inman hit Norman Hill for rather a lot (32 in one over IIRC) in making 51 in eight minutes when Notts (?) were feeding Leicestershire runs in an attempt to provoke a declaration, and I think Whitehouse was also bowling with the same aim when he did his 4-0-64-0. Don't remember the details. Johnlp (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All correct , Sir. http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2012/05/27/spo11.asp WillE (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1446[edit]

After all these mindbendingly difficult questions, I thought I'd jump in with an easy question: "Mystery", "Cementhead" and "Muscles" are nicknames coined by the Asutralian team for which three players and why? --Roisterer (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Morrison, Roy Fredericks and Venkatapathy Raju? Morrison bowled an innocuous line, hence the lack of mystery; Fredericks because a ball hit his head and sped to the boundary; Raju because of his lack of muscles. Ovshake (talk) 07:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No idea about the first 2 nicks,But I think Ashley Mallett was also referred to as Muscles .Raju's nickname was coined by McMillan I suppose .. Sumant81 (talk) 07:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty close so far; John Morrison (cricketer) was nicknamed "Mystery" by Rod Marsh when Morrison came on to bowl in a one day game after never having given the indication he was a bowler, while the Australians called Venkatapathy Raju "muscles" because he was the least muscular cricketer they had ever seen. "Cementhead" was given to a New Zealand player after a bouncer hit his helmetless head and raced off for a boundary. Which fiery NZ cricketer was this? --Roisterer (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cementhead had a brother who also played Test cricket. --Roisterer (talk) 13:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Crowe. Ovshake (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Crowe, nor a Hadlee, which leaves us with ... --Roisterer (talk) 02:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Howarth? Ovshake (talk) 03:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or Howarth. The event happened in the 1980s as well, in case I've forgotten any more sets of NZ brothers. --Roisterer (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, Brendon Bracewell? Ovshake (talk) 12:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it was actually John Bracewell that gained the nickname "Cementhead" but I'll give it to you because you got the right family. --Roisterer (talk) 10:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1447[edit]

What "feat" have Tommy Ward, Ian Colquhoun, Dave Richardson and Adam Gilchrist achieved in Tests? Ovshake (talk) 07:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WicketKeepers to have scored King Pairs Sumant81 (talk) 08:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Your turn. Ovshake (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Q1448[edit]

Not a quiz question, as such, but..... Which player have you looked for on Wikipedia and been amazed to find there is no article? I looked for Ray (Raymond) Smith of Essex following a thought about him being said to be a cousin of TPB (He doesn't appear to be.) So, after 6.5 years, I've created my first article... Any others, and what will you do about it....? WillE (talk) 21:52, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've been here for nine years or so, so there's been a few Test players back in the day that were redlinks. While Charlie Walker (cricketer) was an article I created in response to a lack of article, what I'm forever most surprised about is the number of prominent international cricketers of times past that are still mere substubs. Sadly, increasing work loads as I wobble my way up the corporate ladder has meant that I don't have as much time as I'd like to get stuck into expanding these articles. --Roisterer (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The real Q1448[edit]

I was at Eden Gardens today. About 850 seats were cordoned off and not used during the match. Why? Ovshake (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anything to do with the recent gang rape? --Roisterer (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Height of Mohammad Irfan => raise the sight screen => seats behind sight screen were removed Sumant81 (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, Sumant. Your turn. Ovshake (talk) 11:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1449[edit]

An easy one(?) to go on with: What happened for the third time in international cricket history in [this match http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Scorecards/452/452039.html]? --Roisterer (talk) 02:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boundary, hundred and winning hit with the same stroke? Ovshake (talk) 10:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No. It's always good to look at debutants. --Roisterer (talk) 08:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is something to do with the Sri Lankan debut. Matt294069 (talk) 07:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No. What link did the Oz debutant have to two other cricketers? --Roisterer (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it Kane Richardson starting his career with 2 maidens? Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The answer is Kane Richardson but not quite for the reason you give. This has turned out to be somewhat more obscure than I thought. What about if I said the other two players are Damien Martyn and Mathew Sinclair? --Roisterer (talk) 13:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Northern Territory folks to play internationals Sumant81 (talk) 02:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
YES! Martyn and Sinclair were both born in the Northern Territory while Richardson was born in South Australia but grew up in the Northern Territory. As far as the NT media is concerned, they are all Territorians, along with anyone else who has passed through the place on the way to international cricket. --Roisterer (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1450[edit]

In the hope of getting things moving, allow me. Sumant can no doubt hop back in later... Why are the numbers 46,53,and 51 international oddities for Shahid Afridi? WillE (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is ShafAf most noted for? WillE (talk) 13:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can we beat a month and two days for the answer......? Bit if a contrast to the rapid answers of old.... WillE (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He's known for lots of things but perhaps sixes hit in Test, ODI & T20 cricket? --Roisterer (talk) 06:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's to do with sixes, but that's not the answer. If you get the answer, you'll go "Really? That high?" (Well, I did anyway!) WillE (talk) 12:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was originally going to guess something to do with teeth, but now I'll go for the height in metres of his highest sixes. That is high. Gamesh (Gil) (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think that has ever been measured, except for that game where going into the upper tiers could get you 8 and 10, and hitting the roof got you a 12. Investigating Statsguru and looking at one column in particular in any of T20, ODI and test matches should give it away.WillE (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*sigh* These were ShafAf's highest scores in the respective formats without hitting a six. Goodbye, and thanks for all the fish. WillE (talk) 12:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shame. I'm a big fan of the quiz but sadly I'm not very good, particularly statswise. I hope enough people remain interested to keep this going because I always ge a buzz when I actually answer one right. --Roisterer (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with Roisterer, Personally I haven't been able to spend much time on this in the past year ,but would definitely like to contribute now and then , I prefer this means of communication as opposed to the facebook and any other social media stuff .So lets keep this going especially for the wonderful questions we see now and then Sumant81 (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1451[edit]

Okay, yet another attempt to revive the quiz. Who was the last Christian to play Test cricket for India? Ovshake (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tinu Yohannan ? Sumant81 (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. Later. :) Ovshake (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Varun Aaron ? Sumant81 (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. It is your turn now. Ovshake (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SUMANT!! Ovshake (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
posting one tomorrow Sumant81 (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1452[edit]

What does this ordered list refer to with respect to test cricketers? Wally Hammond,Saqlain Mushtaq,Garfield Sobers,Herbert Sutcliffe,Len Hutton,Vijay Hazare,Jacques Kallis,John Edrich,Saqlain Mushtaq,Jack White Sumant81 (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hint think longevity. Sumant81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
longevity across a match ..Sumant81 (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you have Four triple centurians, a thirteen wicket haul, and nothing else that I can see. Warm? WillE (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sort of related but not exactly,For instance Len is the only one there because of his 364 .More runs & wickets may not imply longevity ..right :)? Sumant81 (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Percentage of hours batted and/or overs bowled when compared to the hours batted/overs bowled by the team? Ovshake (talk) 10:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not as complex as that ,can you keep it simpler and you will have the answer . And it is individual related not compared to the team Sumant81 (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would have said that they all spent all five days of a Test on the field but I know that Kim Hughes, for example, did that and he's not on the list. Am I on the right track? --Roisterer (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No going off track,Ovshake was closer to the actual answer but someone just needs to simplify his answer .If it helps its not to do with the amount of time itself but ... Sumant81 (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most time spent on the field during a Test? Ovshake (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very warm,something as simple as that ,not time but ...? Sumant81 (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most number of overs spent on the field during a Test? Ovshake (talk) 14:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will give it to you as you are almost there . Quite simply it is the maximum number of (balls faced +balls bowled) in a test match .Wally Hammond 977+0=977,Saqlain Mushtaq 248+644=892 ,Garfield Sobers 480+408=888 and so on Sumant81 (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1453[edit]

Who was Eric Morecambe talking about? "I can always tell it is the start of the English cricket season by the sound of ball thudding against ______________." Ovshake (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Brian Close's body". --Roisterer (talk) 03:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. All yours, then. Ovshake (talk) 05:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1454[edit]

Hopefully this isn't too obscure: which former Test captain is surely the only cricketer to face both Clarrie Grimmett and Tom Moody in a match (obviously not the same match)? --Roisterer (talk) 09:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a trick question? Ovshake (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Real live question with a former male, Australian Test cricket captain as the answer. --Roisterer (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Hassett? Ovshake (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Simpson ? Sumant81 (talk) 05:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neither, although Simpson apeared as captain both before and after the chap we're after. --Roisterer (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brian Close? Johnlp (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think John is referring to Brian Booth. Sumant81 (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, no, I didn't look at the insertion of the word "Australian" in front of "Test captain". So if you think Booth, Sumant, the glory is all yours. If it's right of course... ;-) Johnlp (talk) 11:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not Close or Booth, although with Booth you're Close, so to speak. --Roisterer (talk) 11:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Barry Jarman was perhaps in most of the right geographical places to do this. Johnlp (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John McGuire (sportsman) ? Roberry (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Johnlp has it right. In the book Grassroots (about South Australian district cricket) Barry Jarman talks about how he was a child cricketing prodigy, making his district debut aged 14 and facing up to Grimmett. After his retirement, he made a comeback as the leader of the colts team, which was a team of juniors captained by a senior player (Jarman), who passed his wisdom on. The SA colts side played a number of other state's colts teams, including a WA team featuring Tom Moody. As Jarman mentions in the book, he's pretty confident he's the only cricketer to face both Grimmett and Moody. Since Grimmett made his first class debut 78 years before Moody, I wonder if there's anyone who faced Brian Close in a match and then face someone who will make their first-class debut in 2027 and thus break Jarman's record (presuming it's a record)? --Roisterer (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to know the complete story,good question Sumant81 (talk) 08:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1455[edit]

Should be a nice easy one. Which former Test cricketer (and captain) has been under the mistletoe and found it a life-enhancing experience (despite, it should be added, the consensus of medical opinion)? Johnlp (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Edrich? Ovshake (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's right. According to the new Wisden, Edrich claims that symptoms of his cancer have gone away through treatment with a mistletoe extract. Well done and over to you. Johnlp (talk) 21:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1456[edit]

There were back-to-back incidents after Martin Kent's in the second (Australia's first) innings in this Test. First, all eleven Englishmen broke out in a simultaneous applause. Right after that, there was a smart-aleck comment, and barring one, the remaining ten Englishmen broke down in a raucous laughter. Name (a) the incident OR (not AND) (b) the comment. The names of the person making the comment and the person who did not laugh are obvious if you know either a or b. Ovshake (talk) 11:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hint - the person was made the comment was Ian Botham. Ovshake (talk) 04:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
was Boycott the person who did not laugh Sumant81 (talk) 06:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was it Rodney Marsh's "How's your wife and my kids?" Jibe? 207.218.21.5 (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the person who did not laugh was Alan Knott. Ovshake (talk) 11:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delving deep into my memory, after Kent's dismissal, there was an announcement over the loudspeaker which Knott didn't hear and asked Botham what it was. Botham replied that they announced a record that Dennis Lillee broke, and so Knott politely clapped along with everyone else. Botham then laughed and said it was actually an announcement that Knott had actually broken a record and now it lookd like Knott was applauding himself? --Roisterer (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Botham asked Knott to stop 'showing off'. Yours, now. Ovshake (talk) 14:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1457[edit]

Sorry about the delay; my gf likes to drag me away from important matters. "Why did Brian Johnston receive a letter from a concerned listener criticising Ken Barrington's mother?" --Roisterer (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"... though he was dropped when he was two." Ovshake (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's it! Johnston liked telling the story that, following a Test match where he announced that Barrington had scored a cenury, despite being dropped when he was two, he received a letter from a listener critising Barrington's mother for being so careless/clumsy as to drop Barrington when he was a small child. Johnston was never sure whether the listener was serious or not. --Roisterer (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1458[edit]

X was bowling, and Y was fielding. Y kept muttering something between deliveries. Curious and amused, X asked another fielder exactly what Y was muttering. The fielder responded that Y kept on saying "well bowled", but added "you b***ard" every time. Identify X and Y. No part-marking (mainly because if you get one you get the other). Ovshake (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any hint will give it away. They earned a name as a pair for a certain period of time. Ovshake (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lillee and Marsh? --Roisterer (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. Let me make this easier. There was a specific match X had achieved something despite Y's presence, which still intrigues a lot of people. Ovshake (talk) 08:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Laker & Lock? --Roisterer (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. No price for guessing that X was Laker and Y was Lock. Ovshake (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roisterer!!!!Ovshake (talk) 08:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1459[edit]

Sorry, I hadn't realised Ovshake had responded. This should be simple: what happened in this Test match but didn't happen again until this Test match 55 years later? --Roisterer (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I had been taught a completely different definition of the word 'simple'. Hints? Ovshake (talk) 09:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both these games started on a Friday. Is that it? Johnlp (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would it help if I said that it would have been apt to have asked this question on 30 November? And if that's a bit obscure, I could point out that both Tests feature Australia and that Glenn McGrath, who made his debut in the 2nd Test mentioned, forms part of the answer. --Roisterer (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I need to supply more clues: Look at Australia's opening bowlers in bot matches and what similarity you find ... --Roisterer (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Is it as simple as two 'Mc's opening the bowling in each case (30th November being St. Andrew's Day)? I was considering something more statistical re:McGrath... AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Australia's opening bowlers in the 1st innings of the 1938 Ashes 2nd Test were the two Mc's Ernie McCormick and Stan McCabe, while it wasn't until Craig McDermott and Glenn McGrath opened the bowling in the 1st innings of the 1st Test of the 1993/94 series against New Zealand that two Mc's again opened the bowling for Australia. Had my Scottish grandmother been a cricket fan, she would no doubt have muttered "about time". --Roisterer (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1460[edit]

This question may not last too long. Which pair make up the tenth on this list, for Test matches since the beginning of the year 2000?

Grant Flower - Gavin Rennie
Stephen Fleming - Michael Papps
Kevin Pietersen - Jonathan Trott
Kumar Sangakkara - Hashan Tillakaratne
Mark Butcher - Alec Stewart
Andy Flower - Grant Flower
Abdul Razzaq- Wasim Akram
Enamul Haque - Khaled Mashud
Daryl Tuffey - Daniel Vettori
X - Y

AllylViolinPudding (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These names represent the relevant 1st-10th wicket partnerships concerned for this record. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if 3rd wicket is correct ,but is the 10th wicket Dion Ebrahim & Henry Olonga Sumant81 (talk) 09:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's interesting - what is your explanation? By my count, the Ebrahim-Olonga partnership should be second behind X-Y in terms in 10th wicket partnerships for this record. It seems to me that you're very close to the answer. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
longest zero run parternships in an innings for respective wickets .Everything else fits except the 3rd ..Sumant81 (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That is what it is meant to be: here's the relevant Statsguru for the third wicket [1]. Trott/Pietersen is the not the longest for which Cricinfo has data: that would be Goodwin/Matambanadzo in this match [2], but I did state post-2000 for this question. I suppose getting the 10th wicket answer is now trivial, but it is (topically)...? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
so Trent Boult & Neil Wagner in the recently concluded match .I figured out my error I had chosen 2000s in the start date column (which only covers upto end of 2009) and hence the mismatch that we were seeing. Sumant81 (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep - there you go. Your question, Sumant. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1461[edit]

What dubious feat did Shafiul Islam do for the first time ever in the history of cricket? Sumant81 (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conceding 90+ in an ODI twice? Ovshake (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or will it be the dubious feat of holding the record for the two most expensive bowling analyses for a country in ODIs? Ovshake (talk) 09:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a nice spot although not what I am looking for .Infact it is not even something to do with "bowling figures" but something to do with bowling. Sumant81 (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was in the news and happened in the recent series Bangladesh vs New Zealand Zimbabwe. Sumant81 (talk) 10:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Think rules Sumant81 (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bowled two complete consecutive overs? WillE (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This question had been bothering me for a while, since Bangladesh haven't played a full series against New Zealand with Shafiul Islam in quite some time. Did you mean vs Zimbabwe? In which case the answer is that he was the first bowler to be no-balled for breaking the stumps on his follow-through (surprisingly, not Steven Finn) [3]. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct,first bowler to be no balled for breaking the stumps .You are right it was a series against Zimbabwe ,I remember seeing it live and for whatever reason I have written it as New Zealand,sorry about that. Sumant81 (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1462[edit]

Another quick one: what record came close to being broken this week, but wasn't? The record nearly broken was set in this match [4]. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 20:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Something to do with Essex 20 all out ,Only 2 bowlers disimissing entire team? Essex had one runout so it wasnt nearly broken Sumant81 (talk) 07:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhat predictably, this question does concern this week's Essex vs. Lancashire match. However, the record I'm concerned with here is a batting one. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to think of a clue that doesn't give it away too obviously. The Test equivalent of this record is held by a South African, the ODI equivalent by a Bangladeshi batsman, and the T20 equivalent by a West Indian. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 06:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Something to do with the number 11 batsman being the highest score in an innings? --Roisterer (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quite the other end of the scorecard, actually. The West Indian in question is Chris Gayle, and it's slightly unfair to label him with this undesirable record, as he's the only person ever to have done this in a T20. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
single person reaching score > =10 in an innings ? Not sure if the given first class match had the highest such innings Sumant81 (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not it either. The Bangladeshi batsman is Javed Omar. I'll give the South African last, which should give it away. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The South African batsman is Bernard Tancred. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So lowest score while carrying his bat in an innings. Ovshake (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Jaik Mickleburgh could have carried his bat for only 10*, but was ninth out. This compares with Dick Barlow's 5* in the cited match above. Your question, Ovshake. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 22:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1463[edit]

Should be a sitter (especially if you look up). Who had the highest Test batting average in the 19th century? Ovshake (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Bannerman. He averaged 169 after the first test. WillE (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or, if I've used Statsguru correctly, at 31 December 1899, Sir Pelham Warner averaged 69.00. WillE (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, WillE, and welcome back. All yours.

Q1464[edit]

Which player had the shortest career as England Captain? WillE (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Tredwell? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wha? James Tredwell has never capt... Ah, yes. ;o) Onwards and upwards. WillE (talk) 07:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was that the answer you originally wanted when you posted the question, or did you post it before the abandonment? I'm not even sure if my answer is historically correct (was anyone made captain, and then injured before the match started and never captained again?) AllylViolinPudding (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, A1VP - just an attempt at whimsy on my part... WillE (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, then... AllylViolinPudding (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tredwell did lead England in one T20 international Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Q1465[edit]

Five people have ever achieved this: Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Cheteshwar Pujara, Nasir Jamshed, Joshua Cobb, and one other. What is it? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strangely, exactly five people have done this in Test cricket, as well. The one name missing from the above list is missing because the above achievement is essentially the only notable aspect of his cricketing career. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But Cobb hasn't played Tests! Ovshake (talk) 06:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, he hasn't. The equivalent record in full Test cricket has been achieved by five people. But the five named people have achieved this in another situation. In fact, the fifth (unnamed) person has not played full Test, ODI or T20 cricket. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Pyke.[5] - double century on debut in Youth/U-19 tests. --Roberry (talk) 21:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - you've got it Roberry. I thought it was interesting that three had gone on to pretty distinguished international careers, while the other two have more or less vanished without trace. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Roberry? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to point out that Pyke still holds the highest List A score by a South Australian (177), so he's still remembered fondly in some parts. --Roisterer (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1466[edit]

What Warwick Armstrong individual Test record stood for 111 years until it was beaten earlier this year? --Roberry (talk) 03:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Highest score by a No.11 batsman on debut? [6] AllylViolinPudding (talk) 13:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. Amazing performance by Agar - more than doubling the old record, --Roberry (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1467[edit]

What first-class cricket record was set in this match [7]? AllylViolinPudding (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see 10 of the 11 players whose surnames begin with M ,is that the one ? Sumant81 (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It was a bit of a silly question. And, furthermore, the other team also had five players with names starting with 'M'. Your question, Sumant. AllylViolinPudding (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1468[edit]

Only one another cricketer other than Chris Rogers had missed more matches for Australia between his debut and second match.Name him Sumant81 (talk) 06:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be Ritzy? WillE (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Counting years and not matches, Sid Barnes' 1st was in 1938 and 2nd in 1946 (8 years later). Edgar Mayne's 2nd was 1912 (in the 2nd Test in the Triangular Tournament and in which he didn't bat or bowl) and 3rd in 1921 (9 years). Moondyne (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of them ,you dont have to look too far back to find the person .And I am assuming Ritzy is Hauritz,if so not him either Sumant81 (talk) 04:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brad Hogg? WillE (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Correct 78 test matches missed between [8] & [9]. Blame it on the blonde guy Sumant81 (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry forgot to check back. Will try to put up a question within 12 hours. WillE (talk) 15:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that WillE has a completely different definition of the word 'hour'. Sigh. Ovshake (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that Ovshake missed the word 'try' in the sentence. Am snowed under in the real world and have no time to research a question, so if anyone can be bothered, please step it. WillE (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1469[edit]

Here's one for you. Which suspected chucker once held a first class bowling record and still holds an unwanted Test record with 3? KingStrato (talk) 16:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KingStrato, I think a hint is due. Ovshake (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hint 1: It's a fast bowling record and a test runs (or lack of) record. KingStrato (talk) 16:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Mold? I think he had three innings in three matches without facing a ball. (And I now have a question if this is right...)WillE (talk) 10:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed right. And at the time of his retirement he had taken more first-class wickets than any of his peers. Over to you. KingStrato (talk) 15:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have to say, I would settle for just getting onto the pitch in a test team... WillE (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1470[edit]

What puts Dominic Cork in the esteemed company of Wally Hammond and WG Grace? It relates to his Derbyshire days, and to the lesser part of his "all roundedness". WillE (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not something he could do on his own. WillE (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He was batting at the time of each of the three occurences that pair him with Wally Hammond and WG. WillE (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only players to feature in three current county partnership records for batting.Johnlp (talk) 23:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hooray! I think that might be a new record. Only 6 days!! Oh, hang on, it was only six seconds that was the record. Was that you as well, John? WillE (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1471[edit]

Easy one. What connects these places and which is the odd one out? Mumbai, Sydney, Pietermaritzburg, Port of Spain, Bangalore, Johannesburg, Chennai. Johnlp (talk) 10:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign born English cricket captains.I want to call out Johannesburg as the odd one it has the only captain to be left handed ? Sumant81 (talk) 11:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and no. Right connection, but the odd one out has to do with the place not the person. Johnlp (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pietermaritzburg -not a test ground ? Sumant81 (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's it. International cricket venues in Test-playing countries that England captains came from... but Pietermaritzburg has only hosted ODIs. Over to you. Johnlp (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1472[edit]

With reference to Q1449 & for the benefit of our fellow quizzer User:Roisterer ,Who achieved the fourth instance recently? Sumant81 (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hint -The younger of the 2 brothers ,both of whom are native of Australia ,but play for an associate. Sumant81 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
played for the dutch side. Sumant81 (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, how about that. I live in the NT and usually anybody with even the vaguest link to the NT getting an international call-up gets huge coverage in the media here. However, I can't recall hearing about Ben Cooper at all. Good luck to him though. --Roisterer (talk) 07:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Correct.Ben Cooper recently debuted for Netherlands in this odi .Sumant81 (talk) 08:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to comment that this marks my 50th correct answer in this quiz; the first time I have ever got close to 1/2 century in any form of cricket. And this has certainly been an innings that Bill Lawry would have described as "not from the text books": lots of inside edges, edges trough the slips, the odd agricultural hoik to cow corner, uncertain forward defence and enough plum lbw appeals turned down to incite even the most relaxed bowler to kick the stumps down in frustration. But, after raising my bat to acknowledge the crowds' cheers, I will press on, hoping for a century before my captain decides on an iffy declaration. --Roisterer (talk) 02:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations Roisterer! And thank you for being one of those people who keep the quiz alive! Ovshake (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1473[edit]

OK, hopefully this makes sense: A cricketer on his first tour of England tops his country's bowling averages. Then, nine years later, his younger brother also makes his first tour of England and he tops his country's bowling averages. Well done to the two of them and you have to work out who the two brothers are, which should be easy through a process of elimination. --Roisterer (talk) 02:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Collins and Fidel Edwards?
No (are they brothers?). The brothers share the same surname. --Roisterer (talk) 00:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Collins and Edwards are half-brothers indeed. Ovshake (talk) 07:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did they top the series bowling averages or the tour bowling averages? Ovshake (talk) 07:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, the book I sourced the question from just says tops his country's bowling averages, my internet at home is broken and here at work I might have rouble explaining to IT why I was visiting cricketarchive.co.uk or similar. Hopefully my home internet will be up tonight and I'll be able to answer your question.

You're going the WillE way. Or are you WillE? Ovshake (talk) 08:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not guilty. WillE (talk) 11:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted this 'cos I didn't read the question properly!WillE (talk) 11:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it was tour bowling averages (as long as you pay no attention to players who took one wicket on tour for little runs). So, to recap, we want two brothers, who nine years apart (I realised I couldn't count when I earlier said "eight") on their respective first tour of England, top their team's tour bowling averages. And I think I can quite comfortably say that if you were to know which country they represented, this set of brothers would not be your first choice for the best tour owling averages. --Roisterer (talk) 03:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a clue; the tours occurred in the late 1960s and 70s respectively. --Roisterer (talk) 01:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hedley Howarth in 1969... Geoff Howarth in 1978. Johnlp (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's them. Geoff Howarth also topped the tour batting averages IIRC. --Roisterer (talk) 01:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1474[edit]

Whose selection in the squad for a Test match at Lord's, and then subsequent omission from the Test side on a pitch that would have suited his bowling style, led Wisden's editor to question the sanity of the selectors? Johnlp (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could only be Sydney Pardon talking about Claude Buckenham ...--Roisterer (talk) 04:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah well, you're in the right area and the right rant, but Buckenham wasn't the Lord's Test... whereas someone else was. Someone who in fact never did play Test cricket... Johnlp (talk) 08:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
...someone in fact who played first-class cricket for only another couple of years, and was dead a couple of years after that... Johnlp (talk) 23:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alonzo Drake? WillE (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
'fraid not. The player I'm looking for died of TB a century ago earlier this year. Johnlp (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Jayes? WillE (talk) 12:47, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's the one. Sydney Pardon's problem with the selectors seems mostly to have been about the omission of Walter Brearley, whom he considered the finest pace bowler of the period. So he wasn't happy when Jayes was selected ahead of Brearley and then, when the groundsman had prepared a pitch for fast bowling, with Jayes' omission from the starting line-up. Similar ructions over Buckenham later the same season produced even more apoplexy: the selectors "touched the confines of lunacy", he wrote. Pardon blamed the selectors for losing the series after England had been one-up. Over to you, WillE. Johnlp (talk) 13:17, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1475[edit]

What was the reason given by Ray East and David Acfield for standing at one end of a cricket pitch, before this game started, snapping their heads sharply from looking roughly at the stumps at the other end to a point many miles beyond the boundary? WillE (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the dates quite match up but I'd love this to be something to do with the siege of Sealand. KingStrato (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So, I looked at what major events occurred around the time of the match and got: "The Gay & Lesbian Solidarity March is held in Sydney, Australia to mark 10th Anniversary of the Stonewall Riots (which later becomes the annual Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras; later incorporating a festival)." Umm, perhaps the actions of East and Acfield were of solidarity with the march? --Roisterer (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both are interesting concepts, but the repeated snapping of the heads was due to the presence of specific people playing for the opposition. WillE (talk) 11:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to do with the WSC players? --Roisterer (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both were WSC players, IIRC, but their fame was just as prominent for their County Chamionship exploits. Simon Hughes, '...and God created Cricket', recalls the incident. Answer tomorrow if no takers. WillE (talk) 11:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Practising for bowling at Barry Richards and Gordon Greenidge. I have that book, but have never been able to read more than a few pages of it without getting irritated. Trying much too hard to be amusing, IMHO. Johnlp (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hurrah! You may be right about the book overall, but it was, unusually, an Essex anecdote I hadn't heard and it made me laugh... WillE (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've enjoyed other books by him and like his analysis on TV: just this one leaves me a bit cold. Johnlp (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1476[edit]

The creator of Mike claimed to have opened the bowling with a Test cricketer who gave it all up to become a singer. Who, where and approximately when? (Two names, please.) Johnlp (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Mike" is a fictional cricketer who appears in several books. Johnlp (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Brett Lee? Curtly? Maurice Allom? But gave it all up to become is strectchign it a bit for all those those. Mike? Woodhouse presumably. 207.218.21.5 (talk) 16:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're heading in the right direction. Keep going... Johnlp (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Colin Blythe? PG Wodehouse? About 1910? WillE (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wodehouse is indeed the creator of "Mike", the cricketer. But it wasn't Blythe who he opened the bowling with. Had it been eighty years later, the singer might well have auditioned on a Hughie Green show... Johnlp (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Opportunity Knocks? WillE (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, well done. P. G. Wodehouse claimed to be the senior bowler of the two at Dulwich College (he was a couple of years older) and therefore to have had the choice of ends when they opened the bowling together. Over to you. Johnlp (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1477[edit]

What 'magical' feat links Barry Stead, Graham Gooch, and (possibly) John Emburey? WillE (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BOO!!! One of the feats involved a change of mind, the other two involved Test Matches finishing early - not. WillE (talk) 07:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This match is one of those involved. WillE (talk) 12:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Stead never showed up for that match and played later that season for Notts. So perhaps the magic is that he appears on the scorecard when he never appeared for the actual game. Did Gooch do the same? BTW, Somerset had two absentees versus Hampshire in 1885, but they were not identified by name. Johnlp (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Close enough. At the 13th hour, Barry Stead chose to accept Notts' offer of a contract rather than Essex's and so played for the Notts' 2nd XI on the same day the Essex game started, thus appearing on two scorecards on the same day. Gooch was playing at Lords vs Sri Lanka in 1988, with him and Tim Robinson at the crease with not many needed to win at start of play. Essex named Gooch for the match against Surrey at the Oval. Robinson batted like a snail, and the match carried on until two overs after lunch, by which time Essex had been in the field with 10 players having lost the toss. I think John Emburey did the same thing later that season but I couldn't locate a point of reference for it. Over to you, John. WillE (talk) 12:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1478[edit]

Which double international had a trial at Bath City? Johnlp (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MJK Smith? Arthur Milton? Dick Young? WillE (talk) 12:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, right, there is someone else out there... Neither of the international teams played for was England. Johnlp (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could it be Sammy Guillen? Roisterer (talk)
Ah, no. He was a double international in that he played for his "national" team in two sports... Johnlp (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
St Aubrun? WillE (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, but you're getting a bit warmer. Johnlp (talk) 13:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Viv? WillE (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes. The well-known Antiguan football international. Over to you. Johnlp (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1479[edit]

Who, perhaps harshly, was in 1981 described by Fred Trueman as 'the worst bowler ever to play for Yorkshire'? WillE (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. No-one? Not even a dart through the 1981 teams to see who didn't play many games? Mark Johnson. Fred's favourite to be the next Fred was Steve Silvester, but he didn't quite make it, despite some good games. A fair few more were tried in the late 70s, and by 1981 Mark Johnson was tried. "If that's all we've got", said Fred commentating on one of Johnson's 14 one day games, "We're in trouble. He's the worst bowler I've seen in a Yorkshire team." I felt it harsh then, and still think so now. Wonder what Fred would have made of bowling figures in the last few years of T20? WillE (talk) 20:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reading the Mark Johnson article I was impressed to see that David Warner was taking the time to edit Yorkshire's Yearbook: "Warner, David (2011). The Yorkshire County Cricket Club: 2011 Yearbook"
...and of course he also appeared in The Omen... Johnlp (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q1480[edit]

As a reasonable amount of time has passed, I'll add this: What does the following represent and why is it relevant?

  • 0-0-4-0-0-4-0-0-0-0-2-0-1-4-0(2 leg byes)-2-0-4-1-0-2-1-4-0-3-4-0-3-0-0-0-4-1-0-4-0-1-0(1 leg bye)-0-2-6-6-4-6-1-6-1-4-4-0-4-2-1-1-0-1-2 Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Viv committing murder?? WillE (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, thanks for the bump! Close, but not quite. It was Adam Gilchrist's 57-ball ton at the WACA in 2006. Never beat the Aussies... Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]