Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review/Wide-body aircraft

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wide-body aircraft[edit]

Hello Folks, this article has been updated quite a bit since the last review, any feedback would be appreciated.

Thank you!

PolarYukon (talk) 22:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Born2flie[edit]

Peer review (this checklist is based off of the {{GAList}} example and incorporates some of the Featured article criteria as well)

Article needs copyediting.

Prose
a. well written: b. comprehensive: c. factually accurate: d. summary style:
Some problems with stray sentences that are out of place. When they could be blended into other paragraphs and sentences. Since the article is wide-body, consistent use of the same spelling should be used throughout.
References
a. use of inline citations: b. reliable sources: c. No original research:
Significant number of citation needed tags. Significant number of references not formatted properly (see WP:CITE). {{refimprove}} template at beginning of article.
Style
a. lead section: b. appropriate structure: c. conforms to WP:MOS:
Section heading of Wikipedia links is abnormal and unneccessary for navbox templates.
Controversy
a. neutral point of view: b. stable, with no edit wars:
Graphics
a. quality: b. image licenses:
license for picture of space shuttle on B747 at Goose Bay is not established. A source for that image to verify that it falls under PD would help.
Quality:
Article classification:
Needs some cleanup, but could be ready for A-Class if the reference issues are fixed. --Born2flie (talk) 17:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.