Comment That's quite a generous accept, IMO. I don't know the sources, and can't say categorically that this isn't notable based on them, but I would have declined on account of the patchy cites. Instead this was accepted and tagged with refimprove. Not saying that's wrong, per se; just not what I would have done. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]