Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Assessment/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2015[edit]

  1. Dan Everett Waid: Dan's article has been through lots of edits and additions. I would appreciate an assessment for it Rami.shareef (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Start class has been assigned Countercheck (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2014[edit]

2013[edit]

  1. Santa Fe Building (Chicago): Definitely not a stub anymore. Ibadibam (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Rated start class, although is close to C. The architecture section is pretty good, but vertical circulation is not mentioned. The tenants section needs some work on the prose, and also appears less comprehensive. A good example of a comprehensive article about a similar building is Monadnock Building. --ELEKHHT 00:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rochester Cathedral: The article has changed significantly since its assessment in 2008 (byte count up from 9.5k to nearly 74k).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin of Sheffield (talk • contribs) 9 January 2013‎
    Raised to C, as is comprehensive and overall structured. But the text I find lengthy and difficult to follow. Suggest asking help from the Guild of Copy Editors. The lead needs to be more comprehensive per WP:LEAD. The architecture section is not well structured, being hard to follow the logic of the description. For more detailed feedback suggest listing it for peer-review. --ELEKHHT 11:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2012[edit]

  1. Architecture of England: This article has been changed wholesale since last assement. An assement would also direct further development.Rupertjames (talk) 21:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the current assessment as C-class is about right. There are at least three key issues to be improved for the article to come closer to GA: (1) the contemporary section needs to be prose; (2) the modern section needs to be expanded so that it gets due weight; and (3) many sections are currently lacking inline citations. --ELEKHHT 06:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Market Gate of Miletus: I expanded this recently and I rated it as start but would like an outside opinion if it is C (or B) class. Chris857 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Done re-assessed and provided feedback on article talk page. -ELEKHHT 22:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. John Soane: I've been working on this article, currently at start level, would appreciate any help in getting it to at least B class. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Architon (talk • contribs) 14 May 2012
    Done re-assessed and provided feedback. --ELEKHHT 08:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Colombo Lotus Tower - Dear administrator(s), Please consider rating the article as it's one of the unique towers which are under-construction on the world. It also signifies the development of Sri Lanka. Thank you. CoolGin (talk) 04:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Done - looks like start class/mid importance at the moment, though verification of its claim to be a "tallest" tower would help. Sionk (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2011[edit]

  1. Princeton University Chapel: I've just added this to the project and would like an independent assessment. I'd appreciate any suggestions; I'm not an expert and don't know what's most important for an architecture article. Thanks! Lagrange613 (talk) 19:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 00:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. List of castles in England has been thoroughly revamped, it is currently List class, reassessment would be appreciated, also it has not been rated for importance. Paravane (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --An impressive page, bordering on being an article rather than a simple list! I've never seen such a large explanation of what is and isn't included! Some aspects are of great general interest while on the other hand the list is restricted to part of GB. I've tried to hit a compromise by listing it as 'high' importance. Sionk (talk) 03:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Church of St Peter, Great Berkhamsted browsing wikipedia and noticed this article hasn't been assessed yet. Lcw27 (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Chiswick House currently C class. I have expanded this article form its original one page to around forty given the importance of this iconic peice of architecture and gardens. This is the culmination of over thirteen years of research with the most up to date findings included. Also included are extensive footnotes and bibliography. Please review and upgrade accordingly. Thank you. --Chivalrick1 (User Talk:Chivalrick1)
    N/A now at peer review; C seems appropriate as it still requires major cleanup. --Elekhh (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. William Burges (architect) - I've done a fair bit on this and would like to take it to B Class. I appreciate that its still got some POV weaknesess, as I'm a Burges fanatic and started work on it when I knew very little about Wikipedia conventions. Would really appreciate suggestions as to how it could be improved. KJP1 (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I believe you're actually after a Peer review, not assessment. Looking to the present quality of the article and your sustained effort in improving it, I would strongly recommend that you aim for GA status. In terms of content it's already close to B however it would need better referencing. Particularly statements like "...the defining moment in Burges' life occurred when...", "...his most important works the castle at ..." need to be referenced. --Elekhh (talk) 08:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm (slowly) working on trying to get the article to GA staus, with much helpful advice. But I'd also appreciate a review of its current "Low Importance" rating. As he built four Grade I listed buildings (very important buildings) and was certainly one of the foremost Victorian architects (noteworthy architect), I think the Low Importance grading misrepresents his status. KJP1 (talk) 06:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reassessed. I agree, he was a prolific international architect on high profile projects. Sionk (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010[edit]

  1. St James' Church, Stretham currently start-class. As the author I do not feel able to re-grade it (although I did grade it start from stub). Any comments will be handled expediently. Thank you --Senra (Talk) 18:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    N/A, now GA.
  2. Dome - It was last assessed for Architecture as start class and has changed quite a bit since then. I have worked on it and would like to know where it stands. Thanks in advance. AmateurEditor (talk) 13:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done
  3. Modulor -- I have expanded this article and added previously absent inline citations and references. Kenchikuben (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Cape Town Stadium - reassessed as C-Class for WP:SAFRICA, would appreciate it if this project could reassess the article as well. Ron2K (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hamburg Rathaus, not new but not rated yet. Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Serapeum, I've done quite a lot of work on the article --- can someone check it out, please? Campelli (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. William Lee Stoddart Never-assessed article about prolific hotel architect of the 1920s. Canadian2006 (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Preston J. Bradshaw Never-assessed article about 1920s-era architect of St. Louis, Missouri. Canadian2006 (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Assessed by Fetchcomms 16 April 2010
  9. Paul Bartholomew Never-assessed article about Pennsylvania architect of the 1920s. Admittedly he wasn't an architect of national (or even statewide) fame, but he did design many locally important structures as well as the New Deal planned community of Norvelt, Pennsylvania. Canadian2006 (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Elekhh (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Guangzhou TV & Sightseeing Tower I don't think it is a start-class article. 98.230.214.136 (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It is not better than that. --Elekhh (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jesuit Missions of Chiquitos New article, needs assessment. bamse (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Now GA. --Elekhh (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tower Hill Water Tower New article, needs an assessment. Cheers! Small-town hero (talk) 03:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Has been assessed by PC78. --Elekhh (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Outhouse This is rated as START. It is long and comprehensive. It has sixty footnotes. It is also written from an international perspective. It includes useful architectural, cultural and contextual information. I believe it is still underrated. I can't believe that this isn't a "C" or better. Please reassess. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]
    Rated C. --Elekhh (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Westin Book Cadillac Hotel Needs a quality assessment. Thanks for any input St8fan (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Borderline start/C IMO .--Elekhh (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009[edit]

  1. Outhouse Did an almost complete rewrite. Lots more authority; wider and better content. I put a lot of thought and research into a humble subject. I think it was worthwhile, but would like your critical assessment. Am still asking for that reassessment. thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 16:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

2008[edit]

  1. Topkapı Palace - Gryffindor 00:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. All Saints' Church, Wittenberg - Currently a GA nominee, Religion Project was requested to review, but I think your group's input would probably be more useful. John Carter (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2007[edit]

  1. Andres Mignucci Major rewrite. Would like your critical assessment, rating and importance to give it direction.Nonza (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Henry Klumb Article on one of Puerto Rico's most important architects. Would like your critical assessment, rating and importance to give it direction.Nonza (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Chicago Board of Trade Building: on National Register of Historic Places and National Historic Landmarks list, recently featured in Did You Know, strong content, 20+ notations, multiple graphics, a recent WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the Week ChicagoPimp 21:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. --Mcginnly | Natter 02:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Arch of Hadrian --Nefasdicere 22:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Mcginnly | Natter 23:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Golubac fortress - There are still gaps and questions about a few parts, but I doubt that'll change any time soon. While I know it's not start class anymore, I'm not really sure what it would be, though I'm guessing it's at the level of needing an actual peer review-assessment. Which one should I be going for? -Bbik 03:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Mcginnly | Natter 18:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Appreciate the comments on an expanded stub - now an article - on Thomas Garner, the Victorian Architect and partner of G.F. Bodley for almost 30 years. It is now has an unassessed B rating. I do not know how to add pictures (can't take from other websites such as Google images?) Would appreciate an importance rating.Keoghse 06:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Theatre of Pompey This article has grown considerably and could use an assessment at this time. Although there are still some gaps and citations needed it is now ready for rating. --Amadscientist 00:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Antischmitz 12:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tilt up: newly added to project. Besides some outstanding references, what else is needed? Vagary 09:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Antischmitz 13:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. InterContinental Chicago - appreciate a lookover. ThanksxC | ☎ 09:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Buildings and architecture of Philadelphia - Interested in knowing I made the right improvements, and that the information is correct. Medvedenko 03:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. The O2 No rating since splitting from Millennium Dome. Tbo 157(talk) (review) 16:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Architecture/Assessment/Archive&oldid=1167424347"