Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment/2009

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
5 Centimeters Per Second
7 Seeds
Afro Samurai
Ah My Buddha
List of Ah My Buddha episodes
  • List of Ah My Buddha episodes - Extremepro (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 11:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Improved references. Extremepro (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Question: What cites the airdates? Goodraise 10:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • The official website for the anime. Though could the release page its ANN be a substitute? Extremepro (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • I don't see the airdates in the general references and I'm not sure what you mean with "the release page its ANN". - An RS that explicitly states the airdates is needed for the list to pass B1. Goodraise 11:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • Season 1 and Season 2 Although they are in the encyclopaedia section of ANN its not user edited as per discussion here Extremepro (talk) 12:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                • No, they can not be used. This is a release page. The ones you linked to are user edited. (Note the box on the bottom of those pages, stating "You can contribute information to this page, but first you must login or register".) Goodraise 17:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aki Toyosaki
Allen Walker
  • Allen Walker - Recreated article. ~Itzjustdrama ? C 19:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • C-class. Very close to B-class. Good job so far.陣内Jinnai 19:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I've expanded the lead (using Myōjin Yahiko as a base). Also, I want to make sure I'm interpreting your other comment correctly. I should make the plot overview section a sub-section of character outline? ~Itzjustdrama ? C 22:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Well I'd try to condense as much of the plot section into the character bio rather than a straight merge. I know a few GA characters have a seperate plot section like Sasuke Uchiha, but it doesn't follow the MOS-AM and we don't have any feature articles to go by. For other projects you can see how they do them like Flood (Halo).陣内Jinnai 22:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • If that's so, the manual of style needs some updating. It says "This can have subsections, such as "Appearance and personality" and "History", if encyclopedic treatment suggests separating them; special attributes/abilities would normally go in the former, but they can be treated in a separate subsection if warranted".Tintor2 (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • That may be. I'd bring that discussion up there though.陣内Jinnai 03:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Aria (manga) soundtracks
  • List of Aria (manga) soundtracks - this is a split from Aria (manga); we've followed a sort of blend of the Discography and Anime style guidelines, as that's what this is. More or less. We're sorta working in the dark here. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Mind the hidden comments. - Discographies for franchises built around anime and manga are pretty much unexplored terrain. Here is my take on it, if you're interested. -- Goodraise (talk) 22:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should start discussing this as a project, we do have a lot of album articles that could/should be reworked into discogs. Dandy Sephy (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Arm Slave
  • Arm Slave - Fixed and tried to improve it with references. Whew! I'm ever lucky that I found one reception to the Arm Slaves. I'll try and get the non-Western type Arm Slaves photo in since I got photos from MITHRIL. As usual, any help to at least get this to C Class will be appreciated. Ominae (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well that will help the article with attempts to get merged/deleted. It's not enough for C-class as there are issues with being too in-universe still, formatting issuees, too many sub-sections, lack of creation/development info, lack of a proper lead, etc. If you want specific help post on the talk page first and if you can't get help there, you can request input from the main WT:ANIME board.陣内Jinnai 05:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oh well. Thanks. Will probably do that tomorrow. Ominae (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Atsuko Ishizuka
Asu no Yoichi!
Asu no Yoichi!
  • Asuka Langley Soryu - Importance rating was changed by the Brazilian IP vandal. Vandalism was reverted, but the article rating does need to double check. —Farix (t | c) 04:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Asu no Yoichi! episodes
Bleach (manga)
  • Bleach (manga) - Trying to make another Bleach FT, and saw this hasn't been assessed in about a year (1500+ edits) and since then much improvement has been made, hopefully I can push it to GA, but at the moment I would be happy for a B. Lightlowemon (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Boku wa Imōto ni Koi o Suru
Brave Story
  • Brave Story - Extremepro (talk) 11:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Brave Story - apparently it's lacking in the lead. Wondering if you could help? Extremepro (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - The lead is a bit too short but not unbalanced, meaning all sections are equally neglected. That is not a "major issue" as B-class even allows whole sections to be missing. -> Upgraded to B-class. -- Goodraise (talk) 00:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Baccano! episodes]]
List of Baccano! light novels
List of Brave Story chapters
B.O.D.Y. (manga)
Bokurano (multiple articles)
  • I have a suite of them here: Bokurano: Ours, List of Bokurano: Ours chapters, List of Bokurano episodes, and List of Bokurano characters. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Chapters done, c-class
    • main page done, still start-class (fails everything but supporting materials, most by a lot).
    • episodes done, c-class...just barely.
    • characters done, still start-class. Fails everything but structure.
    • The 2 start-class articles need reception/impact sections and all of them need copyediting. Both of the 2 that failed, as well as the episode one, need some more sources for verifiability.陣内Jinnai 03:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)陣内Jinnai 03:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Eh -- I was expecting the main page to have crawled up to lower C-class. Oh well. (Though, yeah on the copyedits -- hadn't gotten to prosework yet.) Thanks. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Case Closed episodes
  • List of Case Closed episodes - Split 14 more seasons. Needs assessment so the next guy who works on it will fix the problems. DragonZero (talk) 03:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since it transcludes sublists, it automatically gets list-class. I didn't really look over the list too closely, but the tables in the Specials section need to have their headers fixed to span the whole table instead of just the first column, and I believe there has been movement in recent FLCs against listing DVD releases separately, preferring instead a summary in the lead - User:AnmaFinotera should be able to provide more info on that; she's who I found out from. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Case Closed episodes (season 1)
List of Canaan episodes
  • List of Canaan episodes - Updated some info with the DVD/Blu-Ray release. No further updates since pics of the said covers aren't released yet. Ominae (talk) 23:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 01:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. Will reupdate when a photo of the Canaan DVD/Blu-Ray cover is provided. Ominae (talk) 02:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Case Closed episodes (season 18)
List of Casshern Sins episodes
Charizard
  • Charizard - Very well referenced. Going for B-Class. I think it could go for GA once a few sentences in the "Video games" section are referenced. Blake (Talk·Edits) 12:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 18:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Why did you fail it due to references? It looks very well referenced to me. Is there something wrong? Blake (Talk·Edits) 20:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Marked 2 items i believe are likely to be challenged by someone not familiar with the game or with Charizard. The second is {{or}} about is synthesis so either find an independant reliable source or remove that.陣内Jinnai 22:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done. I took out the Blaze thing and referenced the Brawl stuff, because it was covered by the reference already there. Blake (Talk·Edits) 00:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • Contact Goodraise to see if he has any more. I will note this B-class not everything needs to be checked-this isn't a featured article, just those most likely to be reasonably challenged.陣内Jinnai 02:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • I don't know know what you are using to assess articles, Jinnai, but I'm going by the criteria outlined above. That said, I'm now satisfied with the article's sourcing. Goodraise 03:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chibiusa
Children of the Sea (manga)
Chōjū-giga
  • Chōjū-giga - requesting for B-class assessment. The lead is done, removed the tag. Hope it does well. : ) – J U M P G U R U ■ask㋐㋜㋗■ 18:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would like further discussion on whether this should be a part of our scope. So far only 1 member has responded.じんない 01:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Huh? It's the first manga, why shouldn't it? : P – J U M P G U R U ■ask㋐㋜㋗■ 03:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • The problem is, there are also a lot of other items credited for being the origins of influental to modern manga, including artists. We would also have to decide whether to add them. I am not saying this article should defiantly not be in our scope, but it think it needs further consensus, including Toba Sōjō, and other more notable people like Katsushika Hokusai and how to rank such historical artists on our importance scale.じんない 03:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cirque du Freak (manga)
  • Cirque du Freak (manga), requesting a B-class checklist. It probably still needs a copyedit, but I'd like to see if there are any other areas that need expansion. I'd like to find more reviews, though with the third volume coming out soon, a few more will probably pop up (and each volume has contained production info so far). Thanks, WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done.陣内Jinnai 20:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Ha, I can't believe I forgot to reference the character section. In any case, both that and the reception-in-lede issue are fairly quick fixes. I'll just do the copy edit this time around for the article, though, considering how large a backlog there is for aritcles waiting. Thanks, WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 21:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Code Geass
  • Code Geass - plau (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 10:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • For this article, where exactly is it lacking in references? Thanks. - plau (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Placed some {{fact}}s in the article. Please note that some of these templates will need replacement by more than just one reference. Regards, -- Goodraise (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Code Geass characters
  • List of Code Geass characters (I apologize for asking you to do so many assessments, I just want to gauge which articles I can actually help with.) - plau (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. (There is no need to apologize. In fact, by making assessment requests, you're helping this department to keep the ratings in sync with the articles' actual quality. So, just bring them on! :) -- Goodraise (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Code Geass episodes
Cross Game
Dana Sterling
  • Dana Sterling - considerably more content has been added to this article. It should be moved up from its "stub-class" assessment.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thank you. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to improve these (and similar) articles regarding Robotech.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]
List of Darker than Black episodes
Densha Otoko
  • Densha Otoko - B-class checklist please. Extremepro (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Did yesterday and forgot to mark it.陣内Jinnai 01:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Grouped related media together. Wrote notable cast into prose. Moved production section above media section. The manga list would be hard to create as there are three 3-volume series and a one-shot. How to make a table or tables reflecting the 4 manga series? The story is based on a series of 2-channel posts. I'm not sure if I could ref the post(s) to the story. Extremepro (talk) 04:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Don't know what I was thinking yesterday about the manga list. It should have been just a suggestion. As for 2chan, there is an archive of some 2chan threads out there. I'd check that. Otherwise you may have to find some other sources to confirm it since the authenticity is questioned enough that the book company has had to give their word, so to speak. Some independant reliable sources probably would be needed. A police report may have been filed, FE, and references to that may exist.陣内Jinnai 04:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Digimon
List of Dogs: Bullets & Carnage characters
Dragonball Z American Soundtrack series
Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit
Dragon Eye (manga)
  • Dragon Eye (manga) - should the volume list be split into a separate article? Extremepro (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • 10 volumes is pretty close to being borderline, but my personal rule-of-thumb is about 8 volumes, and the series is still ongoing, so a chapter list should be fine. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done and reassessed to C class; lead is way too short, plot too short while characters too long, manga = media and is too short, no production info, inappropriate two-column referencing, excessive ELs, . -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Earl Cain chapters
Eden of the East
Edward Elric
List of Elfen Lied characters
  • List of Elfen Lied characters - requesting reassessment of B-class checklist. I think the article is ready, but I've been fairly active on this article and don't want a potential conflict of interest. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 12:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am going to put the reassessment on hold until the following has been cleared: The secondary titles for all characters (e.g. ";Kohta (コウタ/耕太, Kōta, also romanized as Kouta):"), which is not generally done, see List of Naruto characters, and the lack of a lead. G.A.Stalk 12:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, I'll see what I can do! --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 12:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Didn't notice G.A.S' reply and went ahead with the assessment. -- Goodraise (talk) 12:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Embalmer
  • The Embalmer - Requesting B-class checklist. Thanks, WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • C-class. A word of warning. While the character section may pass b-class, you may need some secondary sources.陣内Jinnai 22:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. I'm used to getting sources for character sections, and I have all the books on-hand, so it shouldn't be a problem. For grammar, I was planning on requesting a copyedit after this, so I'll get to that. With coverage/accuracy, what would need to be sourced? Or is it only the character section that has problems? WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 23:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Manga volumes since there is more than one should give a synopsis of each.陣内Jinnai 03:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Ah, I was wonderng about that. For Free Collars Kingdom, I was advised not to add any because there were only three volumes and the stories weren't connected. For The Embalmer, I have the same problem; except for volume 3, all of them are made up of indiviudal, unrelated stories, some of which can be quite short. I'm worried about it looking choppy. I'll try it out, though, and see if it works. WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 12:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • If you can explain each synposis in the plot so it's clear which volume it's in, it shouldn't be nessasary. Otherwise, if they are rather simple, the plot doesn't have to by as long as typical manga chapter synopsis. You'll just have to explain why it's shorter if someone asks (or perhaps put that in the talk page).陣内Jinnai 22:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Enchanter (manga)
  • Enchanter (manga) - should the volume list be split into a separate article? Extremepro (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • At 19 volumes, a separate chapter list is definitely warranted. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done, reassessed to C class. Missing some refs, too much plot versus rest, lead it too short. Publication needs to be renamed to Production (or Development if Production is deliked for a manga series). Way too many ELs (store refs on talk page instead) and no need for two volume referencing with only 14. Greatly improved, however, from before. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Evangelion: 1.0 You Are (Not) Alone Original Sound Track
Evangelion: 2.0 You Can (Not) Advance Original Sound Track
Excel Saga
  • Excel Saga - Completely rewritten so that it meets WP:MOS-AM and isn't incredibly confusing to read. Also includes the important information now!. Dandy Sephy (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I saw this article before, it's much better now! Reassessed as B-Class. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 09:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of Excel Saga chapters
  • List of Excel Saga chapters - Although not complete because the series has not been fully released in english yet, does this qualify for at least a C-Class Assessment? The article is full and has complete references reguarding Japanese releases. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Assessed as C-Class, getting close to b-class. I left notes on the talkpage. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fairy Cube
Flower of Life (manga)
Free Collars Kingdom
  • Free Collars Kingdom - It's currently rated as Start-Class, but I've done some work with it; I'm also a bit interested in finding out what I should fix, minus the very small concept/creation section. WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 23:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Maybe you could incorporate the facts in the production section into the reception section, as most of them seem rather random and out of context. You're also citing the same sources for both sections. Or you could remove it all together. The characters section seems too much for a three volume manga. A longer plot section might serve the article better. - At the end of the day, the article is about a manga of low notability. Better have a short article of high quality, than trying to create a longer article filled up with trivia a la "Throughout the series, panels show different cat breeds and information is provided on that breed". -- Goodraise (talk) 23:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • The production section does need work, and it probably would do best merged into a different section. As of now, I only own one volume and I do hope to find some production notes in the next few. If I can, it may be easier to encorporate the style of humor used into the section, and I'll cite the books. As for the characters, I'll go through it and rid it of some useless information. The main problem comes from the fact that there are many characters that appear in the books, and not as minor side characters--they star (along with Cyan) in sidestories that last a chapter or two. However, I do see that some information can be added to the main plot section. Thanks for your help! I'll keep working on it, as well as referencing the plot. WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • You really don't need to reference the plot section. Not even our featured articles do that. -- Goodraise (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • Yeah, I know:) It's more of a quirk than anything else, and probably came from my involvement in Final Fantasy character lists, when information was referenced to solidify the proof of a character's emotions, encounters, tasks, beliefs, etc. With this series, it's small enough that it's easy to work with when it comes to referencing plot/characters. Thanks again, though, and I'll see what information I can find about its production! WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fullmetal Alchemist the Movie: Conqueror of Shamballa
List of Fullmetal Alchemist characters
Issues were lack of image in the lead, and the sections' length.Tintor2 (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Re-assessed. There appears to be some possible synthesis in the article.陣内Jinnai 04:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes
Gakuen Alice
List of Ga-rei: Zero episodes
  • List of Ga-rei: Zero episodes - Done. Ominae (talk) 07:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - Hate to be the barer of bad news, but some of the edit summaries are really too short. The way the B-class requirements are worded, it would pass, but since the next step is directly to FL, I'd be more comfortable with comprehensive summaries. What's even worse, the ANN-encyclopedia is no longer accepted as RS at FLC. You'll have to find other sources for those pieces of information. :( -- Goodraise (talk) 10:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's going to be hard since I can't find any other information available. As for the summaries, I can perhaps add a few more. But they're all the gist of the article. Thanks. Ominae (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Ga-rei: Zero episodes - Right. Added more information with more citations. Not sure on this again. Will probably have to keep expanding. As for the episodes, I've been told to keep it around at least a bit more or before the 150 words limit. Ominae (talk) 06:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Ga-rei: Zero episodes - Tried to expand more. Hope its okay for a B. Ominae (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Ga-rei: Zero episodes - Was able to obtain a few more citations to back up the intro and all. Ominae (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gimmick! (manga)
Gin Tama
  • Gin Tama - Requiring assessment after a big expansion.Tintor2 (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Cite the statement about the appearances in other media (or perhaps move that to the character article where it might be more approrpriate) and this should be a B-class article.陣内Jinnai 22:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oops, forgot about that. Done.Tintor2 (talk) 23:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Updated it to B-class and removed the attention notice (no longer needed) congrats.陣内Jinnai 00:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Glass Wings
  • Glass Wings, please. I've updated it a bit and expanded the lede. WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 06:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry for the late reply and thanks for the assessment. I'm just wondering how I can improve the article at this point. Thanks! WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I started a thread on the article's talk page. Goodraise 23:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Golgo 13 episodes
Guin Saga
List of Gundam SEED episodes
Hakusensha
  • Hakusensha - Did the history and everything. Comments are welcome. Amaya Sakura (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - Expanding the lead might be a good next step. Goodraise 07:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • What about now? I've slightly expanded the lead section but is unsure whether it's useable or not.
        • Oh yes, can you advise me on how to pass the coverage and accuracy as well as the accessibility of the article? I would really want this to be a B-class article. Amaya Sakura (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • B2 is always a bit difficult to judge. If you think that "The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.", then go ahead and mark B2 as passed. I can't really tell. Goodraise 19:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Anime and manga is not a very technical topic area, so passing B6 is usually easy. Just write a lead that provides a reader who came to the page using the "random article" button with enough context. Goodraise 19:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hana to Akuma
  • Hana to Akuma please. Would like some advice to improve notability of the article. The series itself is hardly popular outside Japan and is difficult to find reviews for the series. Comments to improve article would be good. Thank you. Samantha Lim88 (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but as start-class "article[s] should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability", this is, despite its length, still a stub. What the article needs, more than anything else, is third-party sources. I can only point you to WP:ANIME's reference libraries for books, documentaries, magazines, and online sources and wish you good luck in finding some. Goodraise 18:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hana to Yume
Hanada Shonen Shi
Haridama Magic Cram School
  • Haridama Magic Cram School - B-class? Extremepro (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still c-class. First, production section is kind of small. Second the "manga" section isn't needed as there is only the manga. Instead it should be a release section or combine it with the production. The chapter list. The chapter list should be in the plot section. Also there needs to be some more wikilinks as the article is orphaned.陣内Jinnai 04:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not sure how to merge chapter list to plot. Extremepro (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think Jinnai meant to merge it into the parent "Manga" section (not trying to put words in your mouth or anything, Jinnai). While I personally disagree with it, I have seen other cases where a short series had a separate chapter list get merged into the parent media section. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • The chapter list is fine - it's placement in the article isn't. My basis is a lengthy chapter list would be linked from such a section.
          The manga section is fine seperated, but should be renamed to "Release" because that's what's it's describing.陣内Jinnai 22:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Renamed manga section to "releases". Extremepro (talk) 22:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Would renaming the section to "Production and Releases" be better so that the production section can be merged into the releases? Extremepro (talk) 22:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haruhi Suzumiya
Hatsuinu
Heidi, Girl of the Alps
Henry J. Gloval
High School Debut
  • High School Debut - now that I've filled in Reception. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - A developement section is missing and the lead is too short. - BTW, I'd split off the volume list. -- Goodraise (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. The list only just gotten to the point of being splittable, but yeah. Development is going to be next to impossible: I've seen nothing in the way of interviews with the mangaka, or even rumors thereof, and the freetalks are singularly useless in this regard (all chatter about her personal life). —Quasirandom (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • If there really is nothing, then it's not needed for B2. Once the lead is brought up to speed, I'd agree to a full B-class rating. -- Goodraise (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hidamari no Ki
Hiro Fujiwara
  • Hiro Fujiwara - Added info and references. I hope a few pointers would be given if needed. Thanks! Amaya Sakura (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hiro Fujiwara - Expanded the lead section as well and added previous pen name's career. Amaya Sakura (talk) 08:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 19:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • May I ask on how to pass B1 and B5? Amaya Sakura (talk) 06:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • B1 is =N because there is several uncited statements and paragraphs. B5 is =N because there is no picuture. While illustrations are not absolutely required for B5, I usually set B5=N for unillustrated articles. If a picture is hard to come by, go ahead and set B5=Y. Goodraise 09:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Hot Gimmick chapters
  • List of Hot Gimmick chapters - just got done completely rewriting it. Also features my first image upload, so I'd appreciate some feedback on my fair-use rationales, as well. =) 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 22:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - About the FUR: It's... well... minimalistic. You might want to explain why the criteria are met, not only state that they are. Goodraise 07:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm assuming b1 failed because of the {{fact}} tag in the lead, and b2 because of no plot summaries, right? (BTW, I sourced that date and added a bit more info/made some tweaks, so if you'd care to look again... ;) ) As for the FUR, do you have any examples that I can steal look off of? 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 08:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Human Crossing
Hatsukoi Limited
Julietta Suzuki
  • Julietta Suzuki - Just created article. Comments would be great. Thanks! :D Amaya Sakura (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - Not much to comment on. An image is missing. Otherwise, the article looks fine. Goodraise 03:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Katsura Hoshino
  • Katsura Hoshino - requesting B-class checklist. Attempted to clean-up the structure and add citations. Some expansion. ~Itzjustdrama C ? 01:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Updated assessment. Cites are good, but the article still lacks key elements worthy of B-class.じんない 01:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Mmm. Yes. But it's hard to find such information. She's only had one public appearance as of yet and I can't find any images I can use under fair use so I'll have to stick with an image of her work. Of course, I might have missed one of her. The only influences I have are on the characters in the current work. Thanks for the assessement, though. :) ~Itzjustdrama C ? 03:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Katsura Hoshino - Have the remaining three B criteria been fulfilled yet? ~Itzjustdrama C ? 23:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kamiyadori
Kara no Kyōkai
The Kabocha Wine
Kanamemo
  • Kanamemo - I found this article as a stub and have done my best to raise it's status. Also, I'm not sure I got the Japanese hiragana/kanji right for the character names.Abion47 (talk) 4:13, July 18 2009 (UTC)
List of Kodomo no Jikan chapters
  • List of Kodomo no Jikan chapters because i found weird that it's still a start. --KrebMarkt 06:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Working on it! --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done, reassessed to a C class. It's almost b-class, but volume six (which came out in January) still doesn't have a summary so I had to check no on coverage. If that gets added, then it should be no problem to promote to B-class. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kekkaishi
Kiyo Takamine and Zatch Bell
Koi suru Tenshi Angelique
Konpeki no Kantai
Knightmare Frames
Kyō no Go no Ni
List of Dragon Eye chapters
List of Enchanter chapters
List of Kyō no Go no Ni episodes
List of Kuroshitsuji characters
List of Kuroshitsuji chapters
List of Train Man chapters
List of VS chapters
LaLa
  • LaLa - Improved the article with readers data, history, etc.. Comments and suggestions welcomed. Amaya Sakura (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Last Order: Final Fantasy VII
Level C
Light Yagami
Lisa Hayes
List of Love Hina episodes
  • List of Love Hina episodes - I don't think the content has been start class for a long time, so in need of an update. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dandy Sephy (talk • contribs)
    Reassessed as C-Class. This is my first time doing this, I would Reassess as B-Class but I feel as more information needs to be added for the episodes. Assessment for B-Class can begin but I dont feel it would currently quite make it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mamoru Oshii
  • Mamoru Oshii - Resubmitting for B class assessment. Added more citations.--Stepusual (talk) 02:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Marked in the article where citations are required for B1. Goodraise 08:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Manga de Dokuha
Max Sterling
Me and the Devil Blues
Mega Man Star Force (anime)
  • Mega Man Star Force (anime) -Crimsonseiko (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • When I go down the list of criteria its hard for me to say this C-class. Specifically right now it fails the WP:GNG as to why it should have its own separate article. It fails WP:MOS-AM for structure, including the lead not being adequate (although this is in part due to missing sections in the article). Many statements are unsourced, etc.陣内Jinnai 02:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oh, wow, I thought we were doing good on that article. I'll look into it. Thanks. -Crimsonseiko (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mewtwo
  • Mewtwo - Achieved A-class for the video game project, got an editor insisting I run it through this project for A-class in it as well.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I remember from previous discussions that WP:ANIME has abandoned the A-class ratings. But also, I don't think two editors is sufficient to promote an article to an A-class as the A-class rating is suppose to be based on a project peer-review similar to FA. —Farix (t | c) 18:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • The video game project has always relied on two reviewers, with a peer review by each favorable but not required. If you want to run it through a peer review process be my guest, but that seems rather pointless unless pursuing FAC doesn't it (which I don't intend to at this time).--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • That may be the way the video game project handles A-class assessments, however, that doesn't apply to all WikiProjects. The video game project A-class assessment is the video games project alone and doesn't affect the assessment of other WikiProjects. Especially for WP:ANIME which doesn't use the A-class assessment. —Farix (t | c) 19:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • The template uses it, there's a category for it, and it's right up there at top of the large assessment quality table. If you're certain the project doesn't have A-class assessments, you should probably just remove it entirely from those items.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • The project tag use to not have the rating in it, but I believe it was readded complements of the folks over at Template:WPBannerMeta trying to force a conversion of our WikiProject banner. But here is the most recent discussion about the A-class assessment. The category is an artifact of when the project use to have the A-class assessment, but an administrator has never bothered to delete it. —Farix (t | c) 19:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • Alright, not a problem. Guess this is withdrawn if there's no reason to continue it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Midnight Secretary
Hikaru Midorikawa
  • Hikaru Midorikawa - cleaned up and updated. Hikui87 (talk) 22:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not to disapoint you, but that is really a stub-class article. Yea it has 1 ref and it has some prose, but it's mostly just a long list. If you cut the list out it's not a long article.陣内Jinnai 20:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mithril (Full Metal Panic!)
  • Mithril (Full Metal Panic!) - Done. Need help on the websites for some of the sources I used that go here for instance since I can't see clearly the page numbers where the scanned booklet pages are numbered and I'm forced (almost) to assume some of their page numbers. Ominae (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Can't see this as being beyond start-class. It's mostly in-universe. The only section that isn't, the translation section, isn't referenced. Right now this also fails notability as well. I would hate to see all that work go to waste because of that. As for the scanned material, if you don't know, it's best not to put a number. It's probably fine for now, however as this article makes it up the class-scale, those page numbers may be important and you may be forced to buy the actual book or remove the source since you can't adequetly cite where it's coming from.陣内Jinnai 01:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. I barely read some of them though (To my knowledge since I had to zoom in the image and check it out to be sure for now). I may go in later and refix them. The translation part may be deleted since I can't find sources for them. Will need to put photos of MITHRIL personnel to later. Not sure which kind. I'll probably need some help on how to make most of the article not look in-universe for the next assessment. Any help from anyone's appreciated. Ominae (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Easiest way is to add reception if its out there, ie non-trivial mentions about the Mithril as an organization (this is not the same as describing it as some people confuse that) from reliable sources (we have a list from the mainpage to start with). If you could document the translation notes, that would also help. Creation and development info (probably found in those books) will help, but won't help it pass notability unfortunatly. Finally comparisons with real-life military units by, again reliable sources, would be helpful. For this you might see if WP:MILHIST might be willing to help you out.陣内Jinnai 03:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Thanks for the help. Nah, the booklets I got don't have creation info in real life. It did have internal structure stuff though. I'll go and get pics of the MITHRIL people too if I have time. Ominae (talk) 04:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Moon and the Sandals
MyAnimeList
Myōjin Yahiko
  • Thanks. The other media section is to short for an image, and there are not many of them for Ruroken. I was planning to add the redesign image. I replaced the ebay ref, but it seems [dub review.com dubreview] is temporaily closed, I hide it until the site returns. Tintor2 (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Nabari no Ou chapters
List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 1)
List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 3)
Natsume's Book of Friends
  • Natsume's Book of Friends. Officially a stub, but ought to be a mid-C by now. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Goodraise 19:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. Just for a sanity check, what do you see as missing for B5? —Quasirandom (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • An infobox image. Goodraise 20:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Added. (Filling in the rest of the needed citations is a longer-term project project than that, heh.) —Quasirandom (talk) 20:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Actually, while I'm at it, was there anything in particular you see as needing more citations beyond the anime section? —Quasirandom (talk) 23:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • Yes, the Drama CDs section. Goodraise 00:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • Hmm. I'm finding enough mention (and downloads) of them that I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the statements, but because they were extras of a magazine and not commercially available, I haven't yet found a reliable source, and machine translators choke on the Flash on the official site. That part won't be a quite find, I think. Carry on. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Negima!: Magister Negi Magi chapters
  • List of Negima!: Magister Negi Magi chapters - requesting a B-Class checklist. This shouldn't be much different from my above request of List of School Rumble chapters, since I developed both articles in exactly the same way. Mmm, pizza (read my above request ;) ). 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 07:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Negima!: Magister Negi Magi chapters - requesting B-class checklist (yep, again). Someone came in behind me and added all the kanji and romaji titles, and the English titles past volume 7. The only things really missing from it now are volume summaries, and English title translations for the chapters that haven't been released in English yet (hint hint). 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 18:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. The non-chapter items in the chapter lists are extras that Del Rey puts in. As I've seen, some editors include such extras in chapter lists, and some don't; I've gotten in the habit of listing them myself. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 21:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of New Cutie Honey episodes
List of One Piece characters
Ōoku: The Inner Chambers
Ordet (company)
Osamu Tezuka
  • Osamu Tezuka -- it says that the only b-class problem is the referencing, but I don't' see anything that's likely to be challenged. What needs to be done here? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 20:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • There's two [citation needed] and several paragraphs not ending with citations. Also, B-class requires everything "important" to be cited, not only everything that is controversial. (current assessment endorsed) -- Goodraise (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Patlabor 2: The Movie
  • Patlabor 2: The Movie - Structure fixed. Wondering if this can go for an eventual GA grade or something. Ominae (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The subject section should should be below production and above reception as it's talking more about the impact of the movie.陣内Jinnai 00:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks. Already fixed. Ominae (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • B-class. Congrats!陣内Jinnai 03:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Thanks. Now I need to start worrying on getting it to GA. Ominae (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Peace Maker (manga)
List of Peace Maker episodes
List of Phantom: Requiem for the Phantom episodes
Planet Ladder
  • Planet Ladder - B-class? Kaguya-chan (talk) 16:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I fixed the one remaining structure issue. Too much plot for a 7-volume manga. Also the volume list is missing chapter info and synposis (as it's more than 1 volume, each volume should list a brief overview of what happens in the volume. Since it's on the mainpage it may not need to be as long as if it were on a seperate article page.陣内Jinnai 23:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Hmm. The english version does not appear to be divided into chapters. Kaguya-chan (talk) 12:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I believe it should still mention the Japanese ones, although the issue was recently brought up and I can't remember what the consensus was, if any.陣内Jinnai 19:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • I don't remember any discussion on the matter, but it seems to me that if the original Japanese version has chapter titles whereas the English translation omits them, the Japanese chapter titles should be included with "in-house" translations, and a note in the lead stating that the English version has no chapter titles. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pokémon Diamond and Pearl Adventure!
  • Pokémon Diamond and Pearl Adventure! - Just wondering what you would rate this as. It has a story, character list, and chapter list. Its referenced by the viz media website and IGN. Is there anything that needs to be fixed besides adding reception? Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Start...barely (if someone else comes and changes it to stub, it probably could also be seen as that). It has a bit more development than Hikaru Midorikawa, which I just assessed, a few more refs, but not many. It has enough prose to warrant dividing it into sections even if you removed the epiosde list (which the other article did not).陣内Jinnai 20:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Erm, I am not sure why you are comparing a person to a manga series, but ok... Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Popotan characters
  • List of Popotan characters - I have addressed the issues I believe. Please note the scheme for listing by importance is done purposefully due to the complex nature of the article dealing with characters from the video and anime that act in entirely different capacities and using protagonist/antagonist, which is normally used, would be impossible as it would violate their role for several characters in one series if they were listed that way.じんない 13:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have reformatted the list, so B3=Y. I am somewhat concerned about the amount of non-free images, it seems as if there is too many (B5 = N}. The coverage seems fine (B2 = Y). G.A.Stalk 18:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I understand, but every image has a reason. The first is to show the cast for the anime, as well as some from the PC. The second are the protagonists and main females from the game, the third gives a visual representation of the hierarchy of the relationship the members have in the anime with the main antagonist more accurately and more concisely than a wordy plot would. The last one is needed because he is the protagonist from the game and otherwise there is no representation from the game present. Because of the complex nature of the use of characters in the storyline for the anime as well as combined with the visual novel i believe it's necessary. Other pages like List of Naruto characters which have complex plots do not have to worry about a game that completely follows a different plotline.じんない 20:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • BTW, i'm not sure, but I think you may have marked it wrong. Also all those you cited are covered under a general reference tag which is acceptable for FL.じんない 20:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I have not marked it wrong; I just did not have time to update it, and would like a second opinion.
          I would rather the first image is aligned top right with the others further down in the article.
          "Shizuku "The One" (center) is whom the girls are searching for. Mea "The Guard" (left) and Keith "The Guide" (right) work for her." The description is too in-universe; please explain the context as well.
          Please right align the image of Chris.
          You might be right about the general reference; feel free to remove the tags.
          G.A.Stalk 20:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • I addressed the above converns. I realize I still need to find cites for the visual novel's VAs though, even though some of them are the same. It may be on the back of the box cover... I can verify the Under17 members, but not the others. I don't have access to the manual either. *smacks head* stupid me, i forgot I have the PS2 game's manual, which should suffice.じんない 21:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • I didn't touch this, as G.A.S obviously had a history with this page. But as he's asking for a second opinion... Referencing is adequate for B-class (B1=Y). But don't elude yourself. Featured means top quality. If there is room for improvement, reviewers will ask for it. Citing small voice actor pages is definately better than giving one large page as a general reference. The article seems complete (B2=Y), but you are propably the best person to judge that. The structure is also adequate for B-class (this is always a problem for character lists; B3=Y). Though the "Notable" in "Other Notable Characters" is superflous. If the characters weren't notable, you wouldn't note them, would you? Also, the reception section belongs beneth the merchandise section. And you're overdoing it with the (sub-)sectioning. That one sentence in "Legacy" might be better placed in the lead and the mini-games certainly don't merit a sub-section. (If something free can be considered merchandise is another matter...) Supporting materials are there (B5=Y). Whether they are too many is a matter of WP:WIAFL (6.) (WP:WIAFA (3.) explains it in a bit more detail.), not of B-class. => My assessment: B-class. -- Goodraise (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • Where else would you put free mini-games?じんない 10:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Well, normally I would have put mini-games into the main article. But I suppose you have a reason to cover them in the character list? If they have to stay there, just remove the sub-section header. -- Goodraise (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Popotan episodes
  • List of Popotan episodes. References and episode summaries were improved since the last review which was said to be close already to a FLC otherwise. 1 episode summary, episode 9, is substantially longer due to the need to constantly distinquish two characters with the same name. If it weren't for this, the episode summary would be within the 100-150 range. じんない 01:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. - Lists shouldn't start with "This is a list of episodes". "See also" and "External links" sections might be nice. Otherwise, this list looks ready to attempt a FLC. Good work. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Popotan soundtracks
  • List of Popotan soundtracks - it has been massively overhauled since the last assessment.陣内Jinnai 07:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • C-Class, but near B-Class. The full width tables under reception should fixed width instead, see List of Aria_soundtracks#Reception for example. Reception information, reviews, etc, if available would also be nice, though not essential. G.A.Stalk 05:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • There is some reception for Popo Music's, but only as it applies from within the anime, ie not commenting on the soundtrack itself so I don't know if that qualifies. You can see the PR for more details.陣内Jinnai 06:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Probably not (you are in a better position to say than I am...). I still recommend that the tables should not be 99% width (see hidden comment in code). G.A.Stalk 16:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Well I went ahead and adjusted the table. I'm not sure if I can get much more for the reception. I may be able to find some production/creation information for some of the items, but I won't hold my breath. I'm lucky the I could get a legacy section for them since not all anime/video games have that.陣内Jinnai 17:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • Nicely done. I would lastly recommend changing the Full Width ASCII too normal width per this discussion. (Full width is also not quite as compatible with the search function.) [I rather the article is B-Class now] G.A.Stalk 04:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Purple Eyes in the Dark
List of Queen's Blade episodes
  • List of Queen's Blade episodes - I just started this list yesterday, was rated start class but I have greatly expanded it was wondering if it can get a look in... first episode list I have ever put together Dex1337 (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done G.A.Stalk 05:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Misread your comment. Will find some images tonight and resubmit. Thanks! Dex1337 (talk) 06:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Queen's Blade episodes - I have addressed all of G.A.S's comments. I have added an image with Fair Use Rationale, expanded the lead section and fixed the reference links. Asking for reassessment as I believe it now qualifies for a B class article. Thanks! Dex1337 (talk) 08:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reborn!
List of Reborn! episodes (multiple)
Red Colored Elegy
  • Red Colored Elegy - recently-created article. Need a Start or above class for DYK nom. Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Start class. A plot overview should be added and the lead should be expanded to qualify for C class. G.A.Stalk 16:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rei Ayanami
  • Rei Ayanami - Importance rating was changed by the Brazilian IP vandal. Vandalism was reverted, but the article rating does need to double check. —Farix (t | c) 04:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done, no change needed. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 12:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for the review. While some of the changes made by the Brazilian IP seemed fine, others were not. However, given the long history of Brazilian IPs engaging in importance rating vandalism, I thought it best to revert and ask for a second opinion. —Farix (t | c) 13:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • It's arguable she should be mid-importance given the notability level of Eva and her notability within it is probably more well-recognized world-wide than almost any other character even beyond the anime/manga fandom community.陣内Jinnai 20:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ringing Bell
Rookies (manga)
  • Rookies (manga) - Extremepro (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The lead is still too short and the reception focuses too heavily on the film. The plot and character sections need some more on them, mostly the character section both a copyedit and change the way the roles say who they are played by from something less intrusive than tons of parenthesis.陣内Jinnai 03:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Roy Mustang
List of Rurouni Kenshin chapters
Saito (Ghost in the Shell)
  • Saito (Ghost in the Shell) - Removed ANN encyclopedia summaries and changed it. Ominae (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Cleaning the refs is a good start. There is still some info unreferenced though and given the lack of coverage, like detailed reception, it will probably need more anyway.陣内Jinnai 23:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Kindaichi Case Files chapters Not my work but i think it's C class. --KrebMarkt 08:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still start class. The lead is still missing info, there are no refs on the English titles, no chapter summaries (even short ones), etc.陣内Jinnai 19:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Saki (manga)
  • Saki (manga) - Expanded for DYK. Needs at least a Start to pass, so if this still needs more expansion to hit Start, please let me know what I can add. Thanks. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR (t • c) 04:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sakura Tsukuba
Satoko Okudera
School Rumble
  • School Rumble - I know it fails #1 currently. I want to have a full re-evaluation though of all 6 points as I had a significant restructuring and expansion of the article so I want to know what actually needs work. I also believe it may fail #5 and #4 which is why I ask for this external assessment. I'm trying to see, beyond #1, what I seriously need to work on.じんない 07:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • School Rumble - largely a procedural request; Jinnai (talk · contribs) has put a huge amount of work into this article, and he recently bumped it up to B (some unreffed stuff was the only point it failed, and he addressed that in spectacular fashion); it would still be nice (and a bit gratifying for him, I'm sure) if someone else could confirm the reassessment and maybe offer some pointers on where to go from here. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. Added a bunch of {{fact}}s. Goodraise 20:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have to disagree with the 2 in the prose. The information is already cited with previous references in the article from multiple sources. Specifically the one under the Live performances section seems to violate WP:CITE and WP:FAITH as since they are previously listed as School Rumble's soundtrack artists. The one's for the production studios is a different.陣内Jinnai 20:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • The whole purpose of inline citations is to make clear from which source a piece of information came. If in your opinion it is enough to cite on first occurence, you might as well stop using them altogether in favor of giving plain references listings. As for CITE and FAITH, I don't see how I violated either. Goodraise 21:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • It's unlikely that School Rumble's soundtrack artist would have that last line challenged as if the previous refs referred to them as such they would certainly be playing such music.陣内Jinnai 22:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I added the refs for the networks/publishers (and moved them if necessary to their appropriate section) in the prose for those I could find. The rest I removed as I could not verify them and did not know who added them. I added refs for Santos and redid the paragraph on Live Performances, however I do believe for the latter that WP:COMMON SENSE was not applied since in an article about School Rumble that if the soundtrack artists did not perform their music, even if they did perform otherwise it would not be relevant to the topic.
List of Sekirei episodes
  • List of Sekirei episodes - Updated with new information. Ominae (talk) 22:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done: The episodes' summaries as well as the lead are still a bit short, but other than that, very close to B-class. G.A.Stalk 05:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Shaman King chapters
List of Shugo Chara! characters
Samurai Harem: Asu no Yoichi
  • Samurai Harem: Asu no Yoichi - B-class? Extremepro (talk) 23:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still C-class. The character section should be condensed to about 1-3 decent-sized paragraphs or only not in list format the most central characters to understanding the plot, ie the main characters, usually the principle protagonist or lead character(s) and primary antagonist, if any. For Samurai Harem that is clearly not every member of the household. Of those members, the narration will focus on some more than others.陣内Jinnai 04:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Cut out the secondary characters. Extremepro (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • How about splitting the original characters to a List of Samurai Harem: Asu no Yoichi characters so that the main article would be much smaller as it is now and keeping the characters on a separate page? Extremepro (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Sekirei episodes
Solanin
Shochiku
  • Shochiku - Japanese film studio that has released several notable anime films. I originally assessed this as Mid-importance, however, I do think it could be assessed to at least High-importance. However, per past discussion on this talk page, a discussion is required before it can be ranked higher importance rating above Mid. Please leave open for 7 days to allow for comments. —Farix (t | c) 02:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • No change do to lack of input. —Farix (t | c) 04:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shinji Ikari
  • Shinji Ikari - Importance rating was changed by the Brazilian IP vandal. Vandalism was reverted, but the article rating does need to double check. —Farix (t | c) 04:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speed Grapher
  • Speed Grapher - Certainly not start class any more... Thanks! NOCTURNENOIR ( m • t • c ) 05:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 05:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks again! Now I guess I need to actually go buy the DVDs so I can write episode summaries and a production section... NOCTURNENOIR ( m • t • c ) 05:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Speed Grapher characters
List of Speed Grapher episodes
List of Spice and Wolf episodes
  • List of Spice and Wolf episodes - I think this meets B-class now, so I'd just like to make sure. If there's anything missing, I'd like to know as I will probably take this to PR and then FL later this month. Thanks again! NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c ) 02:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of Spriggan media
  • List of Spriggan media - Revised with the updates and all. Need help to figure out how to get this fixed up and looking nice at least.

Ominae (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Still start-class. If you want comments from the community how to clean it up, as the main talk page, but just quickly, lead is too short. It should give a concise, but complete, overview of the article/list.陣内Jinnai 23:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Studio Proteus
Switch (manga)
  • Switch (manga) Extremepro (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. -- Goodraise (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • What do I need to do to fulfil the B2 (Coverage and accuracy) criteria? Extremepro (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • B2 is the most difficult criteria, both to achieve it and to determine if it has been achieved. That is because it depends on how long the article is supposed to become eventually. Series articles like that one, should at least have all the sections listed at Wikipedia:Mos-am#Layout for a series article. Though the characters may be discussed in the plot section (if that works better) and the production section may be missing, if no such information is available. In this case: Switch (manga) needs at the very least a plot section of adequate length compared to the rest of the article. There is also not nearly enough prose. Try looking at our good and featured articles, like Tokyo Mew Mew, to see what kinds of things can be said, and where. -- Goodraise (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Takeshi Yamamoto
  • Takeshi Yamamoto - Some basic cuts, rewrites, and expansion. ~Itzjustdrama ? C 22:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lot of work. It's now clearly c-class. Still needs some more though. Currently the article is still heavily favoring in-universe perspective, though probably just some trimming down some of the more minor points would be enough.陣内Jinnai 23:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • What exactly do you mean by "appearances should be under character profile"? ~Itzjustdrama ? C 16:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you mean the plot overview and other media? It is undersuch section.Tintor2 (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Tale of the White Serpent
  • The Tale of the White Serpent - requesting discussion on bumping its importance up to (at least) high, since it claims to be "the first color anime feature film" (and also the first released in America, under the title Panda and the Magic Serpent). Thoughts? 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 20:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Set to "high" per the importance scale. ("Individually significant episodes e.g. Electric Soldier Porygon.") I'd disagree with placing it as "top" because History of anime is more important but given as an example for "high". -- Goodraise (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree with the High rating for said reasons. G.A.Stalk 04:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tachikoma
  • Tachikoma - Fixed up the general ANN credits (have them removed) with others in the meantime. Funny, I probably will work on this and Saito in the figure. Motoko's simply too much. Ominae (talk) 00:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Reassessed at C-class --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 00:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tears to Tiara
  • Tears to Tiara - Added a lot of information. Please tell me if there's anywhere that's not right. There's a tag for the image File:Tears to Tiara (Aloun and Riannon).jpg, wondering whether that could be removed? Thanks a lot! Amaya Sakura (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Telepathic Wanderers
Toei Animation
  • Toei Animation – Brazilian IP editor randomly upped the importance rating to Top without any kind of discussion. While I reverted the edit as this same editor has a history of upping ratings even when the article doesn't warrant the increased rating, I believe the article should be ranked at least as High on the importance scale. --Farix (Talk) 16:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • In this case, based on comparative studios per out assement criteria, I'd have to agree with him. This isn't condoning his other actions.陣内Jinnai 23:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Togari (manga)
List of Togari chapters
List of Toradora! episodes
Torikaebaya Monogatari
  • Torikaebaya Monogatari B-class checklist, please - note that this is only peripherally related to manga, being the source tale for two manga adaptations. While the information on the source tale is developed, there is little information on the manga adaptations. --Malkinann (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toshokan Sensō
  • Toshokan Sensō - Been updated for some time. Ominae (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Toshokan Sensō - Request for reassessment. Did reception. Nothing can be found for now. Development was kinda in the anime section in media, unless the one who assesses the section wants it to be separate. Ominae (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nothing in the anime section belongs into a development section. The basic questions "who?", "when?", and "what?" are correctly answered there. What should be in a developement section is more inside information, the kind of thing said on DVD commentaries, interesting facts about the creation of the series. As for the reception section, it only contains information about the series' comercial success. What is needed is critical reception. - It's just not enough for B2. -- Goodraise (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tsuki no Warutsu
Town of Evening Calm, Country of Cherry Blossoms
Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle
List of Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle albums
List of Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle chapters
Uwasa no Midori-kun!!
  • Uwasa no Midori-kun!! C-class checklist please. Extremepro (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article is surpisingly good in line with the MoS and meets four of the B-class criteria. But Start- and C-class articles have more basic needs that should to be satisfied. A C-class article should leave no doubt that the topic is notable. I'm certain the manga is notable, but the article doesn't make that clear enough. The manga rankings are a good start, just not quite enough. In one sentence: More third-party sources are needed for a C-class rating. Regards, -- Goodraise (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Uwasa no Midori-kun!! reassessment please. Extremepro (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Appears to be have some meat on it now, but still has some work to do on real-world coverage. C-Class is my reccomendation. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 09:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Valkyria Chronicles
List of Valkyria Chronicles episodes
List of Viper's Creed episodes
VS (manga)
  • VS (manga) - Merge production and manga together to make "Production and Releases"? Extremepro (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • C-class. If this only has a manga release, the section should be titled "release" as it otherwise implies there is more related merchandise.陣内Jinnai 23:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Expanded lead, renamed "manga" to "releases" and used a quotebox for that long quote. Re-assessment please. Extremepro (talk) 11:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Edit: Merged production and releases together to form "Production and Releases". Extremepro (talk) 11:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Still C. Partly my fault for not explaining long quotes. They should use <blockquote>. The code must be at the beginning of the line for the opening and closing brackets and the text inside it. You need to reference the quote itself as well.陣内Jinnai 18:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Used <blockquote> instead of {{quotebox}} with ref of the quote. I though you were talking about {{quotebox}} when you said use a quotebox. Extremepro (talk) 07:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • Yea, sorry. That was my fault. Anyway, it's B-class. Congrats.陣内Jinnai 08:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Witch Hunter Robin
The World of Golden Eggs
Yaoi-Con
Yoshiharu Tsuge
  • Yoshiharu Tsuge - Importance re-assessment to mid as a Key figure of the indy manga in Japan. Any thought ? --KrebMarkt 13:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • What is indy manga? The article doesn't mention it. Goodraise 11:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • indy for independent. I guess, i should postpone my importance re-evaluation for when more content would be added to the article so the re-evaluation would be easier. Sorry to not have been easy on you ;) --KrebMarkt 11:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yoshihiro Yonezawa
  • Yoshihiro Yonezawa - added infobox picture. I'm assuming the lack of an image was what made the article fail criteria B5 last time. Extremepro (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Patlabor 2: The Movie - Changed style of citations. Took care of dead links and any potential ANN encyclopedia links. Trying to get this at this at GA status and perhaps FA. Ominae (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well it passes that part, but unfortunately it fails WP:MOS-AM for structure. This shouldn't be too hard to fix though.陣内Jinnai 06:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Damn... And I thought it was okay. I guess a little help on fixing the structure won't hurt. Ominae (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Reception goes at the bottom and production goes below characters. Not sure where Subject should go as i'm not sure what it really is and it's even necessary. Basically think of this as a news article: you have the lead, which gives a general overview and usually used in splash pages or as teasers. You then give what most people want, the plot-related info. Then comes how the item came to be produced, how it was marketed, released, etc. Then finally it's real-world impact and reception overall. This is listed in a general order of importance.陣内Jinnai 21:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yui Ikari
  • Yui Ikari - Importance rating was changed by the Brazilian IP vandal. Vandalism was reverted, but the article rating does need to double check. —Farix (t | c) 04:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yuki Kaida
  • Yuki Kaida - Cleaned up, completely rewritten, reformatted, referenced to the best of my ability, and compared to her Japanese article, though I made some edits while logged out. I really don't think it should be classified as a stub anymore, but I'm new to Wiki, so I'd like some more experienced eyes to judge. Chuugoku (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's a start class. There are enough refs to meet WP:V and there is some semblance of formating and some prose. It's mostly the referencing though. Good job.陣内Jinnai 04:56, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yuki Kure
Yūkan Club
Yutaka Yamamoto (director)
List of Zatch Bell! episodes
List of Zatch Bell! episodes (Season 1)
List of Zatch Bell! episodes (Season 2)
List of Zatch Bell! episodes (Season 3)
  • List of Zatch Bell! episodes (Season 3) DragonZero (talk) 02:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think this may still be lacking some approrpiate wikilinks in the episode descriptions and the episodes lengths, while correct may be too detailed as Zatch Bell was not an overly complex series. However they both comply with b-class. The grammar does not though. Just reading that first episode description was bad enough and skimming through I could tell the other plot descriptions were just as bad. The lead seems fine though.陣内Jinnai 04:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Assessment/2009&oldid=1206682749"