Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 January 12
January 12[edit]
Template:BJJRank[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Template:BJJRank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Use of this was explicitly rejected in an RfC: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons/Archive 17#RfC Can notable Brazilian jiu-jitsu people display a rank icon in their infobox like Judo people do? Some additional rank-icon templates for other martial arts like judo should perhaps be addressed separately, since they were not covered by the RfC in question. PS: I put the TfD notice at the top of the template's /doc page, since putting even the small version into the template itself my booger the display of infoboxes, which is what this template was created for. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- delete part of a rejected RfC, but substitute it on the corresponding talk page in case anyone wants to know what it looked like. Frietjes (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:MTV Movie Award for Best Cameo[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
This isn't really a career defining moment for anyone here, it's pretty trivial. Can't see why anyone would want to navigate between these articles in this way. --woodensuperman 15:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Has an article at MTV Movie Award for Best Cameo so fits the criteria. We shouldn't make award navbox a popularity contest. Keep it neutral - it is either notable, has an article and enough links, at which point a navbox is ok, or it fails one of those checks and a navbox isn't ok. That said, I'd probably be in favor of eliminating all award navboxes, but not one by one. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is too trival. This would fit under the argument of Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox and Wikipedia:Avoid template creep as the articles on the winners pretty much have dozens of award navboxes already. This award isn't the most notable out of them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a pretty trivial award, not exactly a career-defining moment. Do people really use navboxes to navigate articles in this way? --woodensuperman 15:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Has an article at MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss so fits the criteria. We shouldn't make award navbox a popularity contest. Keep it neutral - it is either notable, has an article and enough links, at which point a navbox is ok, or it fails one of those checks and a navbox isn't ok. That said, I'd probably be in favor of eliminating all award navboxes, but not one by one. Gonnym (talk) 11:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is too trival. This would fit under the argument of Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox and Wikipedia:Avoid template creep as the articles on the winners pretty much have dozens of award navboxes already. This award isn't the most notable out of them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.