Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 30[edit]

Template:Inland Empire Radio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result of a botched move attempt. Template:Riverside-San Bernardino Radio has been correctly moved to the new Template:IE Radio. SirChan (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st ID[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A non-encyclopedic cross-categorisation; per the recent discussion at Notability:People: Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross recipients, the awarding of the Knight's Cross was deemed not to confer presumed notability on the recipients.

The template thus does not serve a useful navigational purpose and is indiscriminate. The appropriate Category:Recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross already exists and is sufficient for navigation. Similar templates have been deleted in the past, such as TFD:KC recipients of the Fallschirmjäger (multi-TfD); TfD:KC recipients of the Kriegsmarine surface fleet; TfD:KC recipients of the 4th SS Division (multi-TfD), and more.

In addition, I'm nominating the following "KC recipient by X" templates; the nominating rationale applies equally to them as well:

K.e.coffman (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olddelccc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Obama confirmations, 2010[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Please ensure that before deleting this template, it is substituted into the relevant article (possibly Confirmations of Barack Obama's Cabinet), and that links to it are adjusted. Please also consider what to do with it's sister template. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created this template to carry the spillover from Template:Obama confirmations and have never thought it perfect, especially as it wasn't continued to the end of Pres. Obama's first term, let alone his second. The original or mother template fills a space in at least one article about Obama's cabinet. The format of both is designed to conveniently compress comparable basic information about all the cabinet-level (or Supreme Court) posts requiring Senate confirmation, such as date of nomination and confirmation vote, as well as to allow readers to see how each Senator voted for or against confirming each nominee. I don't oppose deleting the template if the same information can be presented in some equally-convenient way (Repeal & Replace, rather than simple repeal). But I don't have the time or energy to put in on my own all the work that might require.—— Shakescene (talk) 04:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nurul Momen graphical timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Massive and unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Information is duplicated in the article, and I can't imagine the template will ever serve much purpose. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Number-one singles in English-speaking countries[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Attempt by an editor to create almagated number-one lists from chart providers in English-speaking countries. It didn't fly, and the template serves no beneficial purpose. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the finding at AfD. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notphoto[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, parent category was deleted in 2006. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NotifySOTD[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; sound of the day is defunct Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Not file talk page[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. A merger-scope may be reviewed. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly terse Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Norwegian Media Authority[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern Cyprus mobile phone companies[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Norden (East Frisia)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Noise Unit[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Newtown Jets squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Neopost[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not useful for navigational purposes Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Need Vietnamese[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National Symbols of Algeria[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National Symbols of the United Arab Emirates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NPA1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no clear use. Just use WP:NPA. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NJCOTWcur[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 9. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NJCOTW-invite[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 9. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CM Blas Kids original programming[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 9. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philippines former state[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 9. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox heraldry[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox heraldry with Template:Infobox organization.
Variables/parametres pretty much pertain uniquely to the context of the United Kingdom. On a side note, pretty much only the United Kingdom does have such a public heraldic organisation. No clear reason to have specific template for that reason, when a customised version of Template:Infobox organization would be just fine. Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. {{infobox heraldry}} is not concerning an organization but a herald, an officer of arms, which is an official post. For example, this template is used in the article Lord Lyon King of Arms, the title of the herald responsible for the Court of the Lord Lyon in Scotland. The Court of the Lord Lyon article does not use this template but uses {{infobox court}} (as it is not an organization but a court). Specific heralds have existed throughout history in many European countries, and were royal court officers in pre-Revolution France (office d'armes) and official roles still exist in other Commonwealth countries, even if not as prominent as the ones in the UK still are (who tend to all be knighted etc). Perhaps rename to {{infobox herald}}. МандичкаYO 😜 09:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I find it Good , usable !. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment, yes, it appears as though most of the parameters could be mapped into {{Infobox organization}}, but the fine-grained leadership information would be lost. but, I'm not sure if that's significant enough of an issue to prevent the heraldry template from being replaced with the more generic organization template. Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Frietjes: This template is NOT THE EQUIVALENT of an organization. This is not about an organization. It is an office that someone is appointed to. The heraldry organizations already use the court or organization template. МандичкаYO 😜 05:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Wikimandia, so merge it with {{Infobox official post}} instead? Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • I don't see the point given the uniqueness of heraldic authorities, and I especially don't see the point of people nominating templates for merging when they don't have the slightest concept what the templates are about. МандичкаYO 😜 14:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 12:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's a specific area with unique fields and would only clutter up the very general "Organization" template, while confusing those who do understand its purpose. I've experienced this before with other attempts at making a "one size fits all" template work for a specialist area. --Bermicourt (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Any qp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Wikidata. While the name isn't exactly great, the general consensus is that this (now) unused template largely duplicates what is already present in {{Wikidata}}. No one advocated deletion so to avoid a supervote I'll go with the general consensus to "merge and redirect". Primefac (talk) 02:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Any qp with Template:Wikidata.
Does exactly the same as {{wd}} with |property=. Only used in a small number of Philippines related articles, so easily replaced. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Is there actually anything to merge? You could replace it without merging any functionality. thayts💬 15:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don’t think there is – I could have just made it into a wrapper then manually replaced its occurrences. I brought it here though in case there were any concerns, as it’s not new or unused and there may be a reason it exists other than pointless duplication. --JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      If you don't want to fix the about 30 transclusions you could tag it as Template:Deprecated. Something is different, {{wd}} has no formatnum: magic, {{any qp}} tries no safesubst:. –89.15.238.161 (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      {{wd}} (or actually Module:Wd) does do some basic number formatting by adding delimiters. thayts💬 20:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • note. It looks like it has been removed from the articles. Looking at a few for exactly how it is used I could not find it, and a null edit stopped the article thinking it was including it. The articles had not been changed so it was presumably being included by a template, which can take care of any formatting differences. Can’t find the relevant template/change, but as far as I can tell there will be no consequences if this is deleted or made into a wrapper.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 12:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cycling data CA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Craig(talk) 09:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Templates were created less than two weeks ago, are not intended to be transcluded and are instead intended to be used by Template:Ct (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) which has thousands of transclusions. Furthermore, the creator of the templates hasn't been notified, it's not explicitly required but as these templates are brand new, it might have been an idea to ask what they were for before going straight to deletion. These appear to be part of a huge Category of team data templates. And you already know all of this. Nevermind. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NGA Chair[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If ever used properly, it would be applicable to one article (or whatever). Since its usefulness will never be for more than one page, this template lacks versatility. Steel1943 (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFaudiooveruse[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NEWT notice[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused for experiment from 2009 Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unused template for a project that was discontinued in 2009 amidst heavy criticism. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFCC issue note[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, apparently inactive given that documentation is also tagged as inactive Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: If I am following this template's documentation correctly; {{NFCC issue note}} and {{Non-free review}} have been deprecated in favour of {{FfD}}. The first template appears to be something akin to a maintenance template, with the second one being for the pre-FfD Wikipedia:Non-free content review. I don't know what the appropriate procedure for these "historical reference" pages is. That said, the timestamp template is just wasteful, there's no reason to have a separate template just to date the thing. Delete or Merge {{NFCC issue note/Timestamp}} into {{NFCC issue note}}. No opinion on the actual note for now. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note from the creator of the template: This was originally made to be used in conjunction with WP:NFCR as roughly outlined at User:Toshio Yamaguchi/NFCC task. I stopped to perform this task long ago and do not plan to resume it. As far as I know, no other user performed this task like this, so I believe there is no longer any need for the template. Also, if I recall correctly, it was decided through some discussion not to use this template to tag articles anymore (don't have a diff handy). So I probably won't have any further use for it. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NCV[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has been around since 2005 but apparently never used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Per its edit history, this template has in its existence been two different templates and a unrelated redirect. The template is currently a preloaded message, but in the past, it was a template that essentially promoted a sockpuppet (as the template was created by a sockpuppet.) However, at one point, this template also redirected to a title that now redirects to Template:Blocked user. Steel1943 (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NCBI taxonomy[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NASCAR K&N Pro Series East[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was History merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music venues of Minnesota[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music venues in the United Kingdom[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music producer discography[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - not having this G7 deleted was an oversight on my part. I've added that tag hoping to expedite this deletion without requiring the valued time of other editors which can be used better in discussions where the outcome is less clear.--John Cline (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multimeet[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most intense Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mosques in the United States[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mosques in Belgium[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Montevideo Radio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Montenegro city[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monegasque parliamentary election, 2008[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monarchs of Italy[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modified Human Poverty Index in CD Blocks of Purba Medinipur district[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Please nominate the other templates too! (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if still needed Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss México[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Minor Candidates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MiaArtwork[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Meetup-Orissa[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mecheng[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MastiBarnstar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Massachusetts Rivers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Martin Schulz series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Map-intro[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manhattan West[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Man v. Food[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major West Indian Cities[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Magilla Gorilla[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTprogress[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/MTprogress. If the project doesn't have a use for it,they can G6 it. Primefac (talk) 01:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/MTprogress without leaving a redirect. Allow that WikiProject to determine if they need this template anymore or not, but yes, let's get it out of the "Template:" namespace since it is a chart-type template specific to that WikiProject. Steel1943 (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lords President of the Council[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Massively huge template, better suited by category Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, doesn't provide anything a category can't do. Warren -talk- 04:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since it's a fake categorization; there is no single council here, this is just people who happen to have the same job title in different places. Ergo, trivia intersection.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Los Angeles Sol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 9. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 14:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notable Women Generals in the U.S. Military[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Listify is the precise call. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CLN, I think there are more advantagaes to including these entries at Category:Female generals and flag officers of the United States than using this template. There are 83 officers (all, if not almost all entries Wikipedia has) listed in the sub-categories which is well more than is reasonable to show in a template. The template, beyond being mis-named, has a higher maintenance cost. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location of California Capital[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lists of selected mosques[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN anyway Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment/Question: Did the deletion nominator or someone else delete all usages of this template? Which would make it seem useless, indeed. Honestly I don't recall creating this, perhaps it was a copy of something similar elsewhere. --doncram 02:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
  • if i created it i think it myst have had some purpose, but i cant see what, and i am fine with it being deleted now.--doncram 02:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This would not be a useful navbox even if it were used.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Navigates to a series of three mostly unrelated lists none of which use the navbox, per SMcCandlish, not a useful navbox even if used. Besides; {{List of mosques}}, already has "First mosque by country", "Largest in the world", and "Oldest in the world". So this makes this one both useless as well as redundant. Mr rnddude (talk) 06:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Done/See also[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LST-ify Template is just used to store text transcluded on many articles pages without parameters. No reason for this text to be stored here instead of on {{done}}, where the other templates can transclude the text using {{#section-h:Template:Done/doc|See also}} {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nomination doesn't make much sense. This is template sub-documentation. It is not used in articles at all. Is is a list already, and is used, like hundreds of other bits of recycled documentation that are used by multiple templates in the same family, as a sub-page for ease of use. (We have 90 of them for template documentation "See also" sections alone). While the same material could be put into Template:Done/doc itself and could use the new sectional transclusion feature to reuse it elsewhere, there's no actual benefit to doing that. All it'll do is complicate use, and require a bunch of cosmetic edits (to the doc pages of every template in the family) that do nothing but change a very simple transclusion into a complicated and error-prone one that most editors don't understand. Worse yet, any rearrangement of the Template:Done/doc will end up breaking transclusions of that sort. Template subpages are "cheap". It's immediately apparent that they're just bits of code used by other templates, and they generally don't add any maintenance overhead. Listing it here and !voting on it will probably consume more human minutes than would have been spent on this subpage in an entire decade. :-) I really think TfD is better focused on dealing with templates that are actually problems, and hope not to see more nominations like this. "If it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it."  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  04:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I was perplexed at first as I thought that this had been placed both at {{Done/doc}} and at {{Done/See also}}, however, that's not the case. The template is transcluded onto hundreds of Wikispace, Userspace, and Templatespace pages including it's own namesake {{Done/doc}}. That said, it really comes down to ease of use for me. Yes, you could make it so that it transcludes that section from the template doc, or, you could just leave it as it is on it's own template and transclude the whole thing. That is; {{#section-h:Template:Done/doc|See also}} vs {{Done/See also}}. I don't know about everybody else, but, option 2 appears significantly easier to do. Mr rnddude (talk) 06:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The nominator should have looked up the transclusion count: 369! This page is a navbox for 369 templates. —Codename Lisa (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Codename Lisa: This has nothing to do with the transclusion count. I'm not suggesting that the code of this template be duplicated in all its 369 transclusions, but instead that those pages now transclude the content via LST. {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, Pppery. It appears I didn't make myself clear. Well, I was hoping I implied it; more polite that way. You are suggesting labeled section transclusion for 369 instance. That means making 369 edits, changing {{Done/See also}} into {{#section-h:Template:Done/doc|See also}}. After spending both editor's and Foundation's time and resources doing this, what do we get? The end user notices nothing and the editor notices a mere complication. You know, there is an ArbCom section against such changes with no net results; see MOS:STABILITY. If it ain't broken, don't fix it. —Codename Lisa (talk) 10:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's a documentation suboage used by several templates. It's in the correct namespace. However, I also believe that this page may need to be moved away from a subpage title; this page is independent of Template:Done as it applies to several templates. Steel1943 (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of X-Men film series releases[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Line of rulers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Light tactical vehicles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifetime Denunciation Award[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This was created by a 3-edit crank a few years ago, and apparently meant to be a mean-spirited jab at another editor. Clearly this isn't useful. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Del per above and WP:POLEMIC.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the template is intended attack and denounce (hence the name) editors. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lego films[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latinenglish[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lakes Radio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No parent article Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lakes Radio was acquired, so the template is no longer needed.--Shortride (talk) 02:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Dusseldorf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jersey deputies election, 2005[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jeremy Sims[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jelly Belly riders[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jimbo-notice[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, doesn't appear to have ever been used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Inclined to keep this because it should be used, since User talk:Jimbo is a de facto drama board, with high noise, low signal, and little if any policing or repercussions for false accusations, etc. If this were listed in the "See also" section of similar templates, like the ANI notice, then people would use it.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jared Leto[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jazz Radio Stations in Massachusetts[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:January 2012 Move to Commons Drive Priority Candidate[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from five years ago Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Purpose of the template was, in it's own words, temporary. If it hasn't done the job now, it's not gonna do it later either. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ituri[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Introduction warn[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This isn't even used in subst'd form.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Doesn't serve a function given that Wikipedia:Introduction, for which this template was made, is fully protected and has been for the past six years. Introduction2 and 3 haven't been vandlized since 2012 and there's indef semi-protect on them too. Mr rnddude (talk) 06:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Intitle-inline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International Socialist Tendency[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International Humanist and Ethical Union[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International Herald Tribune[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Insignia-Sweden[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox biosphere reserve[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created it in Template:Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve per a request User talk:RexxS/Archive 30 #Wikidata filled infoboxes for Biosphere Reserves. Pinging @John Cummings and PKM: to see if they feel there's any value in keeping it. --RexxS (talk) 00:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Difficult to say what to do with it without documentation or even a sample of usage. If this is a "Wikidata filled infobox", I have a suspicion that both its use and its deletion could be controversial, given how much argumentation is going on currently about WD on WP.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  04:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: We are going to start using this infobox very soon, we have been working on ensuring the data on Wikidata is correct and up to date before we start using it across the relevant articles, there are over 650 Biosphere Reserves so I don't think it is too specific. Thanks, --John Cummings (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Question: Wouldn't it be sensible to put it back into Sandbox or userspace until you're ready to use it, which would save it being tagged as "unused"? --RexxS (talk) 10:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Given the current discussions about using Wikidata-populated templates in enwiki, I'd support moving this to Sandbox until we have some sort of consensus on how to proceed. In an ideal world (ha), as an editor, I'd like to be able to generate the template based on Wikidata data values with a single click, and then paste it as Wikitext, which would address current concerns of Wikipedia editors who want to be able to update templates without understanding Wikidata. - PKM (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per John Cummings, with no objection to temporarily sandboxing it until he's ready to use it, if that's what he wants to do. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep if it will be used soon. If it's using Wikidata, then if it turns out to be overly specific then it's easier to merge it into a less-specific one, but mostly I'd suggest using it as a child template unless it's the only infobox on the page (as {{Infobox World Heritage Site}} is). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian pop cat[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 13:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom; this is another temporary "doing some maintenance for a while" template like another listed here. PS: I terribly disappointed that Google Images couldn't find me a good picture that combined India, cats, and soda pop to link to for humor value. Teh interwebs FAIL.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).