Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 65

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 60 ← Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 → Archive 70

Marc McKenzie

Has played in a notable League Scottish First Division [1] The prod was in 2008 if it is too late or articles not in a good condition would an admin be willing to userfy here User:Edinburgh Wanderer/Marc McKenzie -Edinburgh Wanderer 20:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  •  Done Ordinarily it could have been restored to article space but it's an unsourced BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that.Edinburgh Wanderer 17:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Sundeep Bhardwaj

This is page about a famous photographer and traveller with so much photography around the World i guess its a right kind of article for Wikipedia -SunDeep™©® Bhardwaj Kullu SDBWP™©® SunDeep™ Bhardwaj World Photography™©®, 70+Countries 300+Destinations across 7 Continents™©® "The World is my Studio"™©® (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. there are some other problems here...--Tikiwont (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

William Karlsson

Please restore the edit history to this article which has just recently been recreated. -Dolovis (talk) 18:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done Rjd0060 (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:SnoqualmieFallsLodge.jpg

file did have the correct licensing information -BlueGold73 (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Done In the future, if you add correct licensing information, you're allowed to remove the no-license template. Nyttend (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Tomm Dogg

Hello!

I have some more references that could be enough to put the page for "Tomm Dogg" on Wikipedia. Here are the links:

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/cash-em-out-feat.-k.j.-marcus/id509386957 http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/fresh-mornin-hustle-reloaded/id508683157 http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/drop-it-hot-feat.-marcus-snap/id509386988

Please do the needful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.219.33.28 (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Those are not references; those are iTunes listings. Anybody can put anything on iTunes, just like anybody can sell their self-published porn on Amazon; doing so does not confer any kind of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

anu choudhury

sir , anu choudhury is a superstar of odisha. actually her wikipedia exists , but the thing is that when we are searching anu choudhury by name i don't know why but in google search wiki of anu choudhury is not showing.-117.226.237.141 (talk) 04:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done As you note that page exists. I also find it via google (as first page), and don't see anything such as a noindex tag that would interfere with google search, which otherwise isn't our competence. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

My Library

reasoning -75.186.15.4 (talk) 06:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

  •  Not done although improperly filed, I am not seeing this article anywhere, and I even checked you contributions to see if you had ever edited it. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 07:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Kohmi Hirose

Contesting the prod. Kohmi Hirose is an established musical artist in Japan who has a single and an album that have sold over a million copies, including an established meme based on another one of her songs. It should never have been deleted at prod. -—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done - Tiptoety talk 07:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Hello kitty character portrait.png

fair use image that was deleted because it was replaced by a commons image, which in turn was deleted as a copyvio. -Siawase (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Done. — ξxplicit 20:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Thomas Fielding Johnson Portrait.jpg

I wish to add previously missing copywrite information. -Leicesterscribe (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Ranks and insignia of NATO/Army/Generic

I'd like to continue working on this template. I was busy with real world affairs during the nomination. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 20:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC) - A Certain White Cat chi? 20:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

CustomerXPs

need this article emailed to me. The Author is asking me for assistance on getting it into wikipedia. Phearson (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC) -Phearson (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done. It will need a lot of de-peacocking - "unique and innovative multidisciplinary approach" etc. - in fact, a pretty complete rewrite, and I have my doubts about notability. The best of luck! JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:TCLogo2.jpg

Same as File:Threes Company Title Page 1981.png probably, but the current format is PNG, while the other is JPG. Per WP:Image use policy, JPG is preferred for screenshots. This file was deleted for lack of license information; if undeleted, issues must be fixed, so JPG version will replace PNG. -George Ho (talk) 06:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

I wonder if anybody has time to restore this image. --George Ho (talk) 21:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Done. — ξxplicit 22:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Ceramic Art

I'd like to have this portal userfied to review the status of its contents at deletion, given that it was deleted on lack of activity and not quality and we're having a debate here about the reasons to delete articles. -Diego (talk) 07:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done to User:Diego Moya/Portal:Ceramic Art. JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

unity movement

reasoning -Aushra (talk) 13:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning organisations. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. I note that you already have a copy of the original draft in your sandbox so there is no need to refund it for improvement. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Scott Metzger

This article was originally nominated for speedy deletion in 2009. It was removed from nomination via a hangon tag with no editing whatsoever - the decision was made that it was nominated in error. I am not arguing that Scott Metzger as an individual is so overwhelmingly notable as to make this a mistake, but merely that the article likely had problems more in the area of verifiability than notability. As a musician, the bulk of sources that I was aware of as the original author were online-only in nature, as is typical for all but the most well-known musicians in the modern digital era. I passed maintenance of the article on to a community which I hoped would strive to improve it, but I did not carefully track changes over time. If the article was edited in a way which decreased the apparent notability of the subject, so be it. I would still argue that it is inappropriate to re-nominate an article for speedy deletion a second time, after it had already passed once. In such a case of 'double jeopardy', it would be more appropriate to have a deletion debate, which would certainly give more opportunity to improve said article. -Dubfiend (talk) 17:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I confirm the history including a certain trimming down over time. We discourage repeated csd but maybe the previous csd nomination wasn't really noticed. A this point you can either contact Drmies who deleted it or I restore it and you review an try to improve it once more. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

History of As the World Turns

I wonder if these previous revision are saved -George Ho (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

You filed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of As the World Turns which was closed as merge to History of As the World Turns which didn't exist. Tparis created an empty page with merge-to tag but then reconsidered and deleted it, so there are two deleted revisions. Now the merge has been completed but the relevant history is that of the redirected articles. Hope that helps. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Previous images of BBC One

File:Bbc1box.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File:BBC One logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File:New BBC One Logo 2006.PNG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File:Bbc one 2006.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File:Bbconescotlandidentnew.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]Turns out to be a screenshot consisting of a logo. Screenshots must not be confused with stand-alone logos. Still, JPG is preferred over PNG under WP:IUP#Format. --George Ho (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Is any of these above images eligible for copyrights? Is at least one of them ineligible? Either way, per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 30, BBC logos must not be transferred to Commons. --George Ho (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

All of them have been deleted as unused non-free images. None of them seems to have been transferred to commons. So the only reason to restore one would be to use it somewhere with FUR rationale.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
I wonder if any of them passes threshold of originality in the United States only? --George Ho (talk) 02:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Well, none o the files were actually used, so it’s kind of academic question which you may want to raise that with any of the admins who deleted them as non-free. Or some other of the relevant notice board that you seem to be familiar with. This board here is only for uncontroversial undeletion requests. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Are they or are they not similar to the one I stroke out after that was undeleted? --George Ho (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Strangely I now don't see th first file; the two png files with logo in the name are logos, one spiced up with a revert war, and the fourth would be the surfer in [2]. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Deathray

The article was deleted as the result of an expired PROD complaining that no reliable sources can be found. While I'm not up-to-date on what sources are considered reliable these days, I'm sure something reliable can be found. Hopefully this Amazon link will at least prove that they did exist. -209.87.205.103 (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done "It exists" is not an assertion of notability. Any clever 9-year-old can sell their stuff on Amazon and iTunes, if they want (or if mommy helps them upload). --Orange Mike | Talk 13:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm not attempting to prove notability (although I will now assert that Deathray is notable). The article was deleted due to a complaint of a lack of sources, via a process intended for uncontroversial deletions. Clearly there is now a controversy. If you or the prodder believe the subject is not notable, shouldn't that be taken up at AfD? — 209.87.205.103 (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. There is a claim of importance with their music used on a film, and members also being involved with a band called Cake that has an article. However 209.87.205.103 you are encouraged to find sources to prevent an AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll try to add some soon. — 209.87.205.103 (talk) 12:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:List of Negro league baseball players/test

Resolved
 – Withdrawn. Tea all around. --64.85.214.118 (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Unwithdrawn, would like further discussion. --64.85.214.118 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I tried talking to the deleting admin at User talk:Fastily#Talk:List of Negro league baseball players/test, but his reply was that I should create an account, and he has yet to respond to my follow up. Being frustrated with his stonewalling, I am asking here for this page to be undeleted. I will recycle the reason I used on Fastily's talk page:

  • Hello, will you restore this page please? I know it had an in-progress (or something) template on it but I did not think that inactivity of a month would allow it to be deleted, unless someone else tagged it for deletion. Eventually, we were going to rework the page a bit, and I was using this as a sandbox, it is even referenced on the talk page. I have a dynamic IP and all of the 64.85.xxxx edits to that page were me. I'll be sure to remove the in-progress template once it is restored so as to avoid any further confusion.
  • Even if I had an account, it was wholly within the guidelines to use a talkspace draft to make collaborative proposals to changes in an article, and link to that subpage in the actual discussion on the talk page. The other 3 talkspace drafts were moved to mainspace a few weeks ago (actually these are lists, not articles, but whatever). I have not had too much time to work on this one, and there was no urgent need to finish it. I don't see what good it does to have pages like Help:Talkspace draft if someone else disagrees with that and deletes the page as "uncontroversial". It is frustrating to have instructions say one thing, and then something else happens. Please reconsider.

(Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) -64.85.214.118 (talk) 11:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

  •  Not done Pretty disgusting to pick and choose the statements of the deleting admin to make the situation look different than it is. Fastily stated that if you create an account, they will undelete the contents to a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT where you can continue to work on it. That offer still stands, as the test area seemed to be generating no real use where it was (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
    • What? I think you're way off the mark here. I don't think the IP is making the situation look different than it is. Fastily said he would restore it if the IP gets an account, but that's wrong on a few levels. One, you shouldn't have to have an account to contribute – IPs are not second class citizens. Two, can you point to a policy/guideline that says you're not allowed talkspace subpages to work on drafts/proposed changes to the article, because I sure can't find one. Three, Fastily deleted it as "Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup", which I'm sure he thought was correct at the time, but it is clearly not "non-controversial" (as evidenced by this discussion). Four, even if my first three points are incorrect, per IAR this draft was helping improve the encyclopedia (as the IP says, the three other drafts in that subspace have now become mainspace articles) and should therefore be kept. Nothing productive comes from keeping this deleted. To the IP: I'll leave this request here for a bit to see if someone who's not one of Fastily's talk page watchers has anything to say, but even if this is unsuccessful, I will be more than happy to help you take this to WP:AN and/or WP:DRV. Jenks24 (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
DRV is of course the editor's next step - this isn't rocket science, and no need for the attack-based reply. In fact, please, I encourage you to file DRV right now. Follow the process Jenks24 - that's why it's around. Don't go around acting all personally setback by things. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Again, I will leave this here for a bit because I think the next admin with a shred of common sense to come along will restore it. DRV, on the other hand, takes seven days. If you think my comment is "attack-based" maybe put yourself in the shoes of the editor who you just described as "pretty disgusting". Jenks24 (talk) 12:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
I did not refer to anyone as "pretty disgusting". I stated that the original claim above was "because I'm an IP, Fastily refused to do it" which is clearly not the case, and would have been offensive if the admin actually said that. The response was "I'd love to - but I cannot restore it to the userspace of an IP, so please create an account so that I can happily restore it there". Also, Jenks, you might want to re-read WP:NPA with your continued claims that I do not have common sense ;-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
You called his/her behaviour "pretty disgusting", and I'd bet that for a new user to be told that by an admin would be quite discouraging. YMMV, of course. No one has ever said "because I'm an IP, Fastily refused to do it", what he/she said was "his reply was that I should create an account [so it can be restored in userspace]". The IP, understandably, wanted it to remain in talk space, so I see nothing wrong with what he has done (and nothing wrong with Fastily's actions either, he just seemed unaware that talkspace subpages can be used for drafts). Anyway, it looks like you may be a CIV/NPA warrior, so I'd better not say too much of what I think. I've taken this to WP:AN, you may wish to comment there. Jenks24 (talk) 02:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
You know what, BWilkins? I did frame that discussion with Fastily. I wish I had shone more restraint in my wording. Please accept my apologies for that (And I apologize to Fastily for being snarky with the "Best of luck..." bit on his talk page), but also please understand my frustration. And Jenks24, thank god I edit conflicted with you or I would be in deeeep right now. Also thank you for your viewpoint Jenks. I think I will chalk this up to experience and let it go. Thanks to you all, now back to editing! --64.85.214.118 (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

(od) Wait a minute, BWilkins, let's step back for a minute. I never asked for it to be userfied -- I asked for it to be undeleted in talkspace. Fastily replied "Could you please create an account to edit? I'll restore the deleted page as a userspace draft where you can work on it. This sandbox really does not belong as a subpage of a mainspace talk page." So he was not willing to honor my request to undelete it in talkspace -- regardless of if I had an account -- which I thought was contrary to the help page and rather off-putting. And I never made such a claim that he rejected it because I was an IP; I made the claim he rejected the request to restore it to talk space. If you believe me when I said I wish I had [shown] some restraint in my posting, then I hope you feel the same way. You seem close to framing the discussion in the opposite direction. --64.85.214.118 (talk) 14:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I know you never asked for it to be userfied: but that is the only way for it to be restored, and Fastily was happy to do so, and so am I (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I think this is a very reasonable undeletion request. I will return the userfied draft to Talk:List of Negro league baseball players/test as per what I wrote at WP:AN. What would be more useful is if it is moved to a title that better describes the IP's goal of the draft (as opposed to just /test) -- Samir 06:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
    • I appreciate the effort you made Samir and Jenks, and others at AN. I logged off yesterday afternoon thinking this wasn't going anywhere so I missed the action. Regarding the title, I just threw it at any ol' title so I could use it as an example on the talk page over there. The main goal of that particular draft was to eliminate the objectivity of the list. You see, List of Negro League baseball players originally was just a group of players from what consensus agreed upon of who was worthy to be on that page, but that was from 2002 or so, and Wikipedia has changed since then. So a new editor came along (not me) and added a player to the list and was reverted, the new editor disagreed as to who gets to pick and choose who gets on the list, so I proposed doing the A-Z pages of ALL players, and leave the first page with some subjective qualifications (all-stars, hall of famers, etc), but the editors are on line so infrequently there was really no urgency or deadline. I figured we would hammer it out hopefully by the end of the year to be honest. In the mean time (yesterday coincidentally), the same thing popped up over on Talk:List of Negro league baseball teams#Does this page's purpose need to be restated? and I wanted to create another subpage just like this one so I could show the guys what I meant rather than have to describe it. That is why I decided to unwithdraw this request; not so much for this page, but so I could create another subpage without worry of it being deleted, too. Sorry for the tl;dr, but no I can get back to working on the Negro league pages without having to worry about this. Thanks so much for your help. (Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) --64.85.216.64 (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Karam Nishapuri

I think the page was vanadlised by a group who opposes the belief of the person in the wiki. Please restore it So I can fix up what they have done. -94.8.80.24 (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please note, however, that the article was never vandalised. The editor who proposed the page for deletion first tried to improve it so that it would comply with various Wikipedia's rules. I expect the article will be nominated for deletion again, because the article's subject appears not to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I am the main recent editor of this page and not one of my edits was based on bias against the subject. I do not know the subject, I do not know his family, friends or colleagues; I am not opposed (or supportive) of any views expressed in the article; and I have no axe whatsoever to grind against his faith, other beliefs or lifestyle. I just thought it was a poor wikipedia bio page: a hyperbolic fan-page or vanity-page about Karam Nishapuri, who is not notable (according to my search of the internet). The article does not need to be fixed, The man is not notable. The page should be deleted.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
If you still believe the article should be deleted the next step is to take it to articles for deletion and see if the consensus is to delete the article. GB fan 16:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Vegan Soy 09

Some one deleted this because it was a recipe. There are many recipe recipe articles such as Chicken_65 on wikipedia, which are not deleted -Mandrake00 (talk) 07:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

And they will be soon. Article X CANNOT justify article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Although it could be restored as a contested prod, it is very unlikely to survive an AFD unless more encyclopedic material is added. This includes references, perhaps where this dish is used, who invented it, its impact in the real world or a trivia section explaining which video games and movies refer to it. Do you have any content to add? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Boruch Szlezinger

The subject has as much notoriety as Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil. It is one of the last Holocaust survivors, former prisoner of Nazi concentration camps, the last survivor of the death marches, he saved the first time his mother and sister during the Holocaust and then he lost his entire family before to find his brother in France. He gave an interview to Max Kohn for the Australian national broadcaster, SBS Broadcasting Groupt hen the interview was the subject of a detailed study in a large university. He works constantly to the memory of the Holocaust and its transmission. He was awarded "Large Invalid War" in Europe, "Policy Deported" by the French government. The deputy mayor and former minister, André Santini and the Defense Minister proposed to the National Order of the Legion of Honor. --ZzcommeZz (talk) 12:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Added this user to list at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MiamiTokyoIntelli, seems just too suspicious Skier Dude (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
No worries, the account is the MiamiTokyoIntelli mine but I did not intend to hijack anything: I just forgot my password so I created this new account and if it is forbidden, sorry I did not know.But can you answer my request ? I feel that you treat me like a criminal, I do not understand. --ZzcommeZz (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I have asked the deleting admin to comment here. ZzcommeZz, do I understand that all three accounts MiamiTokyoIntelli (talk · contribs), Moimoiazaz (talk · contribs) and ZzcommeZz (talk · contribs) are the same person, you? If so, please choose one of them and stick to it: using multiple accounts to comment on the same issue is called WP:Sockpuppetry and can lead to accounts being blocked, because people sometimes do it to give a false impression of support. JohnCD (talk) 12:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes All Three accounts are mine! I did not know that having multiple accounts was banned, I'm new here and I had no bad intentions! If we must choose to keep one account, so I keep it. Regarding my application for the article on Baruch Szlezinger, I still have no answer ... ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZzcommeZz (talk • contribs) 13:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
I asked my wife, a Yiddish speaker and herself the child of survivors, for her opinion, which follows:
"It is indeed important that each survivor of the Shoah/Khurbm/Holocaust leave a record of his or her experiences, as Mr. Szlezinger has so properly done in permitting himself to be interviewed and recorded, and in leaving records at Yad Vashem. He may wish to investigate similar opportunities in France and the US, and for the sake of his family and for the sake of historical accuracy and honesty--particularly in light of the persistence of deniers of the truth. But Wikipedia does not appear to be the proper place for such important material. The experiences of Wiesel are included in the context of their other literary works, works that have been widely published and reviewed, so that there is no question of their notability. The experiences of an ordinary victim (and I realize that no survivor is ever "ordinary"--all are extraordinary, as my own parents were) would only be suitable for an encyclopedia if they have been presented in an artistic and literary form that has been widely distributed and reviewed.
An example of such a person is Vladek Szpiglman, whose narrative is the basis of his son Art Spiegelman's graphic works Maus I and Maus II. Vladek Szpiglman was himself an ordinary man--a salesman--and the fact that he and his wife survived would not be in an encyclopedia had it not been immortalized through the artistic and literary work of his son. Vladek Spiegelman would never have had his own narrative included in an encyclopedia--no matter how important it is historically and personally--had his son's work not been so widely known. My parents' history (similar to Mr. Szlezinger's) has been left at the US Holocaust Museum in Washington DC, and at Yad V'Shem in Jerusalem, but it will never be, nor should it be, in an encyclopedia. I only wish that I had left to me a sound recording like Mr. Szlezinger's for SBS Radio, or even better, a video recording like those made by the Steven Spielberg Foundation in the US, of my parents' experiences.
(A hartsikn dank Barukh Shlezingern far zayn ibergegebnkayt un erlikhkeyt. Mir, di kinder funem shayris hapleyte, kenen gut opshatzn vus di ale dertseylungn un dermonungen kostn in gezunt un vey--un mir veln kayn mol nit fargesn, un kayn mol nit lozn fargesn, dem emes. Mayne eltern, z"l, geboyrm in a shtetl lebm Miechov, zenen shtendik in mayne gedankn. (Entshuldigt mayn modne oyslayg un zayt moykhl di grayzn in mayn yidish.)
I added the links. I also refer to List of Holocaust survivors, for those who do have articles in Wikipedia. .But I dod not think the use of multiple usernames a concern: a beginner could easily make such an error, & we need to distinguish in our messages between them, and those using them to add promotion or disruption, or evading a block. DGG ( talk ) 18:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Sir DGG,

Mr. Boruch Szlezinger is not an ordinary victim. As I have explained above, Mr. Szlezinger saved his mother and sister from the hands of the Nazis to its peril, the first time they were arrested (that is notemment for this act of bravery that mayor of Issy-les-Moulineaux, Andre Santini and Mr. Defense Minister proposed to the National Order of Legion of Honor). A few years later, when almost all his family had been deported (except his brother who immigrated to Russia alone before the start of the war) he was orphaned with no one to help him and he lived alone and then hidden after the end of the war, he immigrated secretly, very sick with typhus to France during the War (it was recognized by the French nation and Europe, Great War Invalid), he was forced to work as a slave by IG Farben, he lived the death marches and it is the last of survivors of death marches and all that, he still has the strength to witness to the barbarity that is the Holocaust. For all these reasons, sir, do come over to tell me that Mr. Boruch Szlezinger is an ordinary victim.

I propose that this article be restored and then it is voted on by users to have the judgment more objective. --ZzcommeZz (talk) 19:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

not to bother my wife with it again, most of this is not the least unusual. Every survivor has a tale to tell of heroism, every survivor suffered from it later. As for the legion on honor did he receive it? (In many previous decisions for all sorts of people, we've considered the legion of honor not usually a sufficient award to justify a Wikipedia article.) I can undelete it, but the article will surely be sent to a formal articles for deletion discussion, and it will almost certainly be deleted after a very public discussion. I would like to spare you that. If you would care to activate your email by going to your user preferences page, I can send you an email explaining more personally that i like to do in public. DGG ( talk ) 15:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Sir, the question is whether one of the last deportees who has a history as that of Mr. Szlezinger must have or not an article on Wikipedia. Personally, I think so because Wikipedia is a well known service that can help greatly facilitate the transmission of the history of such or such a remote but the subject is so complex that we do we can never agree . The best would be that you restore the article to be voted on by users. ZzcommeZz (talk 18:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
I shall do that. I would agree with you if it were the last living survivor of the death marches. DGG ( talk ) 01:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks you very much. --ZzcommeZz (talk) 10:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Krystal Carey

I wonder if a revision as a redirect to List of All My Children characters#Krystal Carey still exists. It was deleted as WP:A1 criteria, but was that an accurate reason to delete? -George Ho (talk) 06:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Done Bobherry nominated it for deletion, it was invalid as it was a redirect with a tag. Fastily should have checked history. There is also Krystal Carey Chandler as a redirect. Anyway one non copyright violation redirect is restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Australian Nazi party

I'm not sure I understand why this article was deleted in the first place. I don't see how the page could have "served not other real purpose" other than harassment or intimidation when the party was quite significant and had a fairly significant history. I'm sure a re-write would be enough to fix these issues, but I don't think starting from scratch is really nesessary SchellZ (talk) 07:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC) -SchellZ (talk) 07:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Not doneWell the page was an attack page, and had nothing to say about Australian Nazi party, instead was being used to attack someone. It will not be restored. There is nothing to build on there. You are welcome to write an informative article on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

The DX

reasoning -Chris griffiths uk (talk) 08:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


The DX

Hi - I have recently created the page for DX. It is based on factual information and has been written in the same manner as other wikipedia pages. Can it please be put back on please?

I am a bit confused as to why you have removed it in the first place.

Rgds

Chris

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please stop creating multiple promotional articles about them (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Anoop Jacob

Elected as member of 13th KLA, now meet the notability criteria. -Kiran Gopi (talk) 04:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Link to election result.--Kiran Gopi (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. — ξxplicit 06:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Josep Maria Socías i Humbert

Invalid speedy deletion. Deleted per CSD A2, but this is article is not written in a foreign language. -VQuakr (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Done as you don't seem to have received a reply from the deleting admin and A2 wouldn't apply. Just keep in mind that this board here isn't really for 'correcting' deletions, but mostly to restore for further improvement, where I count on you as well. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Electric Airlines

relevant importance - the article is about a well known rock band famous in the 1990's. It explains the name of the band formed after world wide success, the article has quotes from newspaper articles which are extremely credible, it is a brief period in time which deserves its notabilty. -Melvin100 (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I'd restore for improvement, but you already have a slightly expanded copy at User:Melvin100/sandbox. Please work on that to make clearer what you're saying above and then contact RHaworth or follow the link to Articles for creation. Best --Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Al Clay

I was not given a chance to submit the following printed article for media confirmation - http://mixonline.com/post/features/audio_hans_zimmers_scoring/ -Alclay (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

High-Tech Gründerfonds

relevant venture capital company -92.228.252.30 (talk) 08:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

The High-Tech Gründerfonds (HTGF) is one of the biggest -if not the biggest- Venture Capital fund in Germany. It has the german government as a back-investor which alone makes it kind of relevant. HTGF funds early-stage seed companies (IT/Cleantech) etc. The quite popular tool Wunderlist/Wunderkit by Berlin based 6Wunderkinder was for example funded by HTGF. So, deleting this page in the first place doesn't really make any sense. --92.228.252.30 (talk) 08:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

It does if you're writing like that. Wikipedia articles must be written from a dispassionate viewpoint and proven independently notable by citing sources unconnected to the subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Well it wasn't deleted per G11 so if you have an account we could userfy it for improvement. Or you may want to bring it up with the deleting administrator Peridon as this board is only for uncontroversial stuff. Either way it'll need better references as already pointed out by Jeremy. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, then undelete it for improvement instead of destroying someones work. Here are some sources btw: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Gründerfonds http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Technologie-und-Innovation/Technologiepolitik/Rahmenbedingungen-fuer-Forschung-Innovation/wagniskapital-unternehmensgruendungen,did=377310.html (this link is from the federal government of germany - guess thats credible enough). here is some info about htgf portfolio companies from a german technology blog: http://gruenderszene.de/datenbank/investoren/high-tech-gruenderfonds --85.181.227.23 (talk) 09:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Vc-joe/High-Tech Gründerfonds. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Peridon (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Toshio Yamaguchi/Userpage4

Page was deleted per my request under WP:CSD U1. I need to look up some information on that page. --- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 19:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Zenfolio

This article should have been returned to my user space instead of being deleted. It was deleted quickly after being created for a reason that is not valid. I have no connection with the company, nor have I been asked by them to do any work on wikipedia on this article. I would like to continue working on this article to improve wikipedia. Specifically, notability has been discussed under the List_of_photo_sharing_websites article, where Zenfolio is listed now because it has been deemed to be notable via Alexa rating. The talk page there suggests there should be an article for entries on that list. That is the reason for creating the article in the first place. I also realize the article is far from complete, but it needs to exist in order for me (and others) to improve it. -Victor Engel (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Victor Engel/Zenfolio. Please note the above linked deletion discussions, so it should make a strong case for notability. In other words a good standalone article usually justifies inclusion in a list and not the other way round.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance.Victor Engel (talk) 14:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Bike derby

Would like to userfy this article. Never done this before so I hope I'm doing this correctly. -Nklatt (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Nklatt/Bike derby . You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the AfD and deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, thank you kindly, Tikiwont. Nklatt (talk) 19:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

MEElectronics

This page was speedy-deleted under G11 although I believe it is a significant company and the article contained sourced and popular opinions. [[3]] Admittedly, it probably could have gone without the banter about some of it's products. -Enthdegree (talk) 04:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Enthdegree/MEElectronics. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact DGG (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! Enthdegree (talk) 14:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Unhola (band)

Page information expanded to meet Wikipedia guidelines. -Osallinen (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done No need to undelete previous then as you're the sole author --Tikiwont (talk) 13:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Cliché_Hot

This album has enough cultural significance to warrant it's own Wikipedia page -Pascal Noël (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliché Hot, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Pierre Vogel

Person is notable. Lots of reliable coverage as the most prominent Islamic preacher in Germany. -89.14.247.64 (talk) 22:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Ben Parcell

All sources were correctly credited and creative commons license is present on the biography of the artist which I took the information from. I do however need to reiterate certain elements -Acousticscene (talk) 00:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

If you mean Facebook, then it is not a reliable source because it's a page he himself maintains. If you mean YCR I see no CC deed on that website. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

The biography on YCR is taken from the artist's facebook page which a CC license is on. http://www.facebook.com/benparcellmusic/info The artist's facebook page is not being used to back up any notable events. which have been provided as references to press clips. Acousticscene (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

YCR's website does not indicate this (Attribution to the source is mandatory for CC licenses, as all are CC-By of some sort), and as such the assumption is that it is under full copyright. Not to mention that because it does not have this attribution, it's a copyright violation, which means we can't link to it. Can you find other sources besides Facebook and YCR? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

I can rewrite the information in my own words using information from various music reviews. Would this be acceptable? Also how do I get my deleted information back? I didn't get chance to back it up as it was deleted very quick after being marked for speedy deletion. Acousticscene (talk) 14:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Assuming you have email enabled on your Wikipedia account, an administrator can email you the content of the article at time of deletion, provided it wasn't copied wholesale from elsewhere. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes please, could an admin email me the last revision of the page before it was deleted, thanks. Acousticscene (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Logos of BBC television networks

File:BBC One HD.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Could not find logs of this image. Maybe this could help: File:Bbc1hd.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - No local svg copy / jpg deleted at FFD so not eligible here
File:BBC One logo.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC Two.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC Three (television channel) 2008 logo.svg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC Four.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC News.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC Parliament Logo.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC HD.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - Restored
File:BBC One HD Box.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] - No local copy

Per WP:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 30, BBC logos are possibly copyrighted in the United Kingdom. Therefore, they must be ineligible in the United States and undeleted at request. --George Ho (talk) 22:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Done As you seem to be asking for the restoration of the local svg copies, I've done so where present. Please check tags. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Potential Blue Line Extension.jpg

I found the image through Google Earth, but the attribution was USDA which is a US Federal Agency and therefore the work is public domain. All subsequent edits to the satellite image were my own and I give them freely. -Psoreilly (talk) 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Not done Material from Google earth is copyrighted by Google. You should look at the USDA to see if you can get their original work for your derivative. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Jennifer Hutt

Jennifer Hutt

Page was deleted when Jennifer Hutt appeared on the Ron & Fez radio program. Her past was being discussed. Some over enthusiastic listeners realized that her longstanding Wikipedia page was being referenced. They then took it upon themselves to change things for comic effect so ti would be read on the air. Many were.

The article was very quickly (and understandably) frozen to prevent further vandalism.

Somehow, due to the scrutiny that this episode drew I'm guessing, her page was then deleted. 'Lack of notability' was cited.

I believe that this decision was hasty and unjustified. From my searches, Jennifer Hutt's Wiki page had existed since 2006. Since that time she has: Had multiple nationwide radio programs. Been the co-star of multiple television programs. Has had articles posted on many internet sites, including Huffington Post. Appeared as guest on multiple television talk shows. And is now a published author as well.

Please re-instate this page. I will be certain that it is updated properly, and that references will be properly cited if they were not previously.

Also User:Courcelles did the deleting. He is currently on a Wiki break.

Thanks, Phil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopackjo (talk • contribs) 01:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Hutt, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Rare entries contest

If the prod assertion that it is unsourced is accurate, I won't ask it to be restored to mainspace, but I'd still like to look at it. Can it be userfied so I can see if it can either be improved to meet Wikipedia's standards or adapted for use in a project with laxer policies regarding OR and N. -Kilopi (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Carl Adams (wrestler) (deleted 17 May 2008 at 00:18)

This page was deleted due to an incomplete provision of the information needed to defend the notability of the subject matter, and an insufficient provision of sources and references. The subject matter of the page more than exceeds the required criteria of sufficient importance and merit, therefore I'm prepared to significantly improve the article by providing a complete collection of relevant information, including sources and references from reliable third party publications. -NDAwiki (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

609th Air Communications Squadron

Please undelete and move to my userspace at User:Pmsyyz/609th Air Communications Squadron so that I can work on show notability/expanding/sourcing it. Thank you. -Pmsyyz (talk) 04:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment Sourcing is not the issue. Community consensus is that support units at that level are not eligible for separate articles, regardless of supposed notability (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
    • I haven't found the full history of the squadron, but if I can establish notability, it doesn't matter that its current mission isn't notable. For example, the 50th Education Squadron might have a non-notable mission now, but it is notable for its mission during WW I and II. --Pmsyyz (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Samuel F. Lee

wanted to edit after proposed deletion comments but was not allowed by one of the administrators. Followed by speedy deletion by another administrator -Slfepnipl (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

No chances of further edit to improve the original article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slfepnipl (talk • contribs) 13:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Deviates (band)

The band the Deviates were a fairly popular punk-rock band from California active from 1994-2004. The former article seems to be deleted because of concerns about notability and lack of reliable sources. This band is known internationally, they toured North America many times on the popular Warped Tour, and their albums are still for sale, I can't imagine how they don't qualify as notable enough to deserve an article. As for sourcing, I could provide a handful of websites with information on the band, which should be plenty of evidence to back up the basic information about this band. This group was too great for history to forget, please restore their wiki! -Brooks bonkoksi (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. As there was also a deletion discussion I've moved it for now to User:Brooks bonkoksi/Deviates (band). Please be so kind to add some of the references you mention before moving it back to mainspace (with its history and talk), to make sure that previous consensus would not apply. Any further doubts can then be settledd at a fresh AfD. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

ISTQB Advanced Level

The article provides clear information about the ISTQB advanced level, no marketing information was provided, but only concrete information about the topic. Similar information is available in ISTQB official material. -Lmgamaral (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done This is one of several near-advertisments, based on ISTQB material, that have been deleted or will soon be deleted, with what useful information is contained in an article like International Software Testing Qualifications Board Certified Tester moved into the main article on the International Software Testing Qualifications Board itself. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_65&oldid=1211784290"