Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 105

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 100 ← Archive 103 Archive 104 Archive 105 Archive 106 Archive 107 → Archive 110

It's only a story

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 94.0.10.20 (talk) 00:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

 Question: I can't find any page, or AfC submission, with that title. Please give the exact title of the page you mean - capitalization and punctuation are important. If you got a notice about its deletion, copy and paste the title from there. JohnCD (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

sandeep maeshwari

Its worth there to be part of the wide relible data -61.12.98.165 (talk) 11:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

 Question: we have never had an article Sandeep Maeshwari. Do you mean Sandeep Maheshwari? If so, there is a draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandeep Maheshwari which can be worked on, and submitted for review when it is ready. If that is not who you mean, please give the exact name. JohnCD (talk) 12:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

St. Maria de Varagella

reasoning -50.196.125.118 (talk) 17:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC) I dont like this opportunity for the Wikipedia Foundation to delete my article.

 Question: - please give the exact title of the article you mean. We have never had an article at St. Maria de Varagella, or any of the variations I have tried. Capitalization and punctuation are important. If you do not know the exact title, please log in to the account you used to create it and leave another message. If you created it as an IP through "Articles for creation", did you get a message to tell you it had been deleted?
The Wikimedia Foundation does not control the content of Wikipedia; that is the responsibility of the Wikipedia community. The article will have been deleted by a Wikipedia administrator, and if you can supply the title we can tell you why. JohnCD (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Olatunde O Isaac

The author wrote the following in this edit (substantially repeating the claims in this prior edit).   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Sequel to the unjustifiable tagging and speedy deletion of an article titled==Olatunde O Isaac== created by anonymous,I hereby write to you with all sense of humilty and commitment as an editor to inform u that the tagging and speedy deletion of the article was ilega to the wikipedia rule.when I went through the work before it was finally deleted, I had the mindset to expand the work. You will agree with me that an Editor may not know everything about an article therefore creating aplatform for other Editor to go through it and expand it. The work has a good refrences,infactit has more than three refrences,which is still far better than some work. Frankly speaking the article was about a notable person who is a very young an Eminnt biochemist from Nigeria. Who also won the award of the youngest scientist of the year 2012. My able and competent Editor jeff,I implore you to do everything within your reach to restore the article titled '==Olatunde O Isaac== deleted by Nawlinwiki on 02 november for God sake so that together we can maintain the wikipedia standard throughout the world. Thanks for you anticipation(Orimadegun016 (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC))
I hope the deleted article looked better than User:Isaacatm/Olatunde Olalekan Isaac (which appears to be a userspace draft of it). Perhaps the two can be combined as a userspace draft?   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I've cut and pasted the content that was at the deleted version to the userspace copy, but the problem is that there was a lack of reliable sources that were independent of the subject that showed notability. There was also a problem with verifying the other sources such as "kingdom of the yorubas 2". You don't have to always have an internet link to something, but we do need more than what was given. For the claims made on the article, there weren't many hits on the internet for his name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, Tokyogirl79. I agree that the restored version is insufficiently sourced. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if the two authors of the userspace copy were the same person, continuing to push for an article on this subject.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Wouldn't surprise me either- it looks like the user has been blocked for continuing to add articles on this person after being asked to stop, and this is probably a way to try to get around the ban. They've added articles at Olatunde olalekan isaac and Olatunde isaac. I've salted the second one and the one that's currently up here. If it is decided to re-create, we can always un-salt it. Personally I'd recommend against it because of the multiple deletions and attempts to re-create it. I'll run the names through a SPI just to see if it's someone trying to avoid a ban. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Excellent work, thank you!   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Looks like you beat me to it! In any case, this looks like it's a case of WP:DUCK, so the userspace draft is going to be deleted as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 Not done - "Blocked, tagged, closing, and will throw away sandbox." per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isaacatm. Move along, nothing to see here. :)   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 07:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

David Akintola

David Akintola is a Nigerian born footballer who plays for sunshine stars fc in the Nigerian premier league. He is well known for his style of play and his fast feet with the ball. He is a striker and can also play from any forward position. he has recently announced his wish to play in Europe so as to get a call up into the National team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.206.12.20 (talk) 09:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Wikipedia articles are required to be verifiable - see Wikipedia:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." For articles about living people, this is so important that they are automatically deleted after ten days if unsourced, and that is what happened here. I have restored it and re-started the ten-day clock. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
☒N Deleted: on further investigation, I have deleted this article, which appears to be a hoax. Akintola does not appear in current squad lists for Sunshine Stars here or here; and his name only appeared in our article Sunshine Stars F.C. because it was repeatedly added there, first by user Davidakintola36 (talk) (who also tried to add himself to Rising Stars F.C. and then by two IPs. JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnston Middle School

Davidoko99 (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please develop it (read WP:Your first article for advice) and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Symphonic Poems (Dvořák)

reasoning -Ravpapa (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

This article was created by a new user, BFolkman, who undoubtedly intended to add content over the next few days. Unaware as he was of Wikipedia's rules forbidding the creation of empty articles, he was no doubt sorely disappointed to find his efforts so soundly trounced.

The subject is unquestionably worthy of a Wikipedia article. The Symphonic Poems, in addition to being notable works in their own right, are important because they represent a shift in Dvorak's compositional focus in his last years, from "pure" music to programmatic music and opera.

So if BFolkman doesn't get around to fleshing out the article in the next day or two, I will do so myself.

Thanks,

Ravpapa (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

 Comment: it turns out that this deletion was a G7, intended by the article author, who had discovered that the subject was already covered. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwerk

Allthough this is a one-man band he has received a lot of attention when the artist's music was used for the adverts for a very popular adventure camera and more recently a car advert. The article was deleted before it was properly finished and I am convinced there is some heavy-handed and overzealous admin work here. It was not even possible to discuss. I thought Wikipedia was a contribution democracy, not a monopoly of certain admins -Martin McDowell (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

The article has been recreated and then tagged again for deletion. I'll let another administrator review the A7, but someone needs to warn Martin that his conduct is unacceptable. For example, on the article talk page contesting the tag (Talk:Overwerk), he says, "You might as well delete my account or block me if you intend to delete this page." On his user page, he says, "Any admin trying to poke their nose in here can duly fuck off."--Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm quite prepared to userfy the article for more work when he calms down a bit. Peridon (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

C4f4s0g0

for the strong reasons that I mentioned on the Talk page! -C4f4s0g0 (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

UFXMarkets

Undelete the page in order to have the independent info about the company for all other visitors. As any other broker (Alpari, FXCM, etc'), they deserve to have their own WIKI page. -89.191.199.65 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/UFXMarkets, and that is where you should comment, but first read WP:DISCUSSAFD. Note that Wikipedia is not a business listing directory: the inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability, see also WP:CORP. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Jess McDonell

I know my article didn't have any References and sources but only because i didn't find any, my sources was only her official twitter account and 2 or 3 weblog of her, if you Undeletion my article i will add them too or whatever it necessary to keep my article alive. -TheNightmare12 (talk) 19:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

 Not done - sorry, but Twitter and blogs, particularly her own, are not good enough sources for a Wikipedia article, and if you can find nothing else, that is a fairly clear indication that she is not (yet) notable enough to have one. Read that link and Wikipedia:Notability (summary), and come back if you can find multiple, substantial, independent references. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Zentyal

reasoning -Sixstone (talk) 16:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

To whom it may concern,

The Zentyal wiki page was deleted due to the concern of non-notable product description.

The product is a SMB-oriented free-software. It has a public Zentyal website for its description that can be enough to revisit the wiki page to be updated.

Let me know if you have any doubts to avoid the deletion.

Best regards,

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quota International

I, Quotaintl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Quotaintl (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. please rewrite this to be non-promotional and include independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quadra Street

The 2009 proposal for deletion didn't consider Quadra Street's historical significance. Until the 1960s it was the main road northward from Victoria. Also, two neighbourhoods are named after it: Quadra-Hillside in Victoria and Quadra (aka High Quadra) in Saanich -207.194.133.9 (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 207.194.133.9 (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

  •  Not done the complete text was "Quadra Street is an arterial road in Victoria, British Columbia, and neighbouring Saanich." But this was deleted via an AFD. However the sentiment was that if you are prepared to write more than this, you can do so. Find the references that talk about it first though! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm prepared to write at least a decent-sized stub. The local university has a copy of Danda Humphrey's Victoria's early roads and railways, which I expect will provide some references.207.194.133.9 (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carolina Quarterly

I, 108.192.133.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 108.192.133.157 (talk) 03:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carolina Quarterly

I am in the process of editing the article to meet the standards of relevance requested by the editor who initially rejected it. About 50% of the authors listed now have documentation, not through a research library affiliated with the University of North Carolina system, since these were deemed invalid sources for this article. I'm working on documenting the others, but have had to put it off to attend to other matters. Will complete the updates by the end of November and re-submit for consideration -108.192.133.157 (talk) 05:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done The page you have here is a redirect, not deleted, but perhaps you are talking about the previous page in the request above. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Trinity_Theological_College_Perth

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 106.68.58.204 (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Trinity_Theological_College_Perth&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ángeles Espinosa

I, 91.73.251.228, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 91.73.251.228 (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Laparoscopic surgery training

I, Hans v.d. Berge, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. training is essential in order to obtain skills for performing laparoscopic surgery. All mentioned training methods are examples of the various possibilities. Of course other options are possible. Hans v.d. Berge (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Chand Zaveri

reasoning -Kabira163 (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I would just like the code I have inserted for my page "Chand Zaveri" that was deleted. Firstly, the page was not finished and so I do not think it should have been taken down or at least until I had finished it. I want the code so I can make a new page about the famous cricketer and hopefully this time it can be finished without having people like you deleting it. Sorry if you have found this argument rude. --- Kabira.

 Not done. Don't worry, I can be rude too. Your article will not be restored because it was nonsense. It claimed that this cricketer is a "left-handed opening batsman for India", but the articles India national cricket team and List of India Test cricketers have not heard of him, nor has CricInfo. It claims that at the age of 15 he has a test batting average of 444, and that he made Test and ODI debuts in 2006, at the age of 8. And the picture was of somebody else. Don't waste our time.
If you want to make serious contributions, read WP:Your first article for general advice, WP:Verifiability to understand that you can't just make things up, and WP:NCRICKET for what a cricketer needs to have achieved before having an article. Then, to start an article, click on Help:Userspace draft which will make a draft page where you can work on the article until it is ready.
By the way, if you are Chand Zaveri, forget about using Wikipedia to make yourself famous. It doesn't work. You can write about yourself in places like Myspace and Facebook, not here. JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Nebulae (band)

band has performed live and is legitimate. Prodicer is part of abelton live community [1] -Msarthur (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Duffbeerforme (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EcoTipping Points Project

editing in process -Regregory (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Peeceebird Disease

The page took a good amount of time to create and was merely in the beginning stages of completion. The article was in NO WAY 'vandalism' and contained purely factual information about the subject at hand. I would very much appreciate a way for me to access this deleted page so I can retrieve the information I worked very hard to put together. Thank you for showing signs of maturity and considering the undo of the deletion of this normal article. -Ss2525 (talk) 02:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) A search for "Peeceebird Disease" returns exactly one result: The deleted page still in Google's cache. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done. Read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. There are sites like Illogicopedia and Uncyclopedia for that sort of made-up nonsense, but this is a serious encyclopedia. Also, do not, as you did here, make unsourced, possibly derogatory statements about living people, even as a "joke", or your account may be blocked - read WP:BLP. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Kanetix

The company got siginficant media attention in Canada and the US, so the notability can be established. I wish to userfy it for possible improvements -BiH (talk) 09:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harshida Madhaparia (Harshi Mad)

I, Harshi Mad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Harshi Mad (talk) 03:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review, but would not be acceptable in its present form. Read WP:Your first article, and note particularly the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability - Wikipedia and Youtube are not reliable sources. Also, the article needs to be rewritten in a neutral, factual tone - stuff like "Her powerful vocals, her charismatic personality as well as her inbuilt dancing ability gives her that X Factor and makes her delight to listen to and watch on stage" is pure puffery, an advertisement, fine for her own website or a gossip mag but totally unacceptable for an encyclopedia. Please develop the article and submit it as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alex_Niggemann&action=edit&redlink=1

reasoning -Info2184 (talk) 11:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Just to let you know, that we already included the same topic and text to the german wikipedia, which was excepted already more than a year ago. As Alex Niggemann is an international well known DJ, it shouldn't be an issue to put up this side in english, when your german colleagues already did and confirmed. Check the link below. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Niggemann

Thanks.

Not done and will not be done. Article is a copyright infringement of this page German wikipedia has different copyright rules Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/பாவ்சார் க்ஷத்திரியர்

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review, but would not be acceptable in its present form because it is written in Tamil, and this English-language Wikipedia can only accept contributions written in English. If you want to publish it here, you must arrange translation into English; alternatively, add the material to the Tamil Wikipedia where the existing article ta:பாவ்சார் சத்திரியர் seems very similar. Please do one or the other as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for indefinite hosting of material found unsuitable for the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Wing Commander John Scott-Taggart

Article deleted, supposedly per CSD A7 (Bio), with "no participation other than from the nominator". The subject was as a very well-known author in the UK during the 1930's, wrote many books, won the Military Cross in WW2 and was awarded the OBE. So was certainly notable. Indeed there are a couple of links out on the web to the now deleted page. More than happy to extend and update to ensure significance is properly asserted and referenced -coherers (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Support - he has an entry in Who's Who which confirms OBE and MC and was a barrister (‘SCOTT-TAGGART, Wing Commander John’, Who Was Who, A & C Black, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc, 1920–2008; online edn, Oxford University Press, Dec 2012 ; online edn, Nov 2012 accessed 7 Nov 2013). Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done to John Scott-Taggart per normal article title standard. It needs a lot of tidying-up and referencing - over to you. JohnCD (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Bodymap 4D

reasoning -Nikesh1c (talk) 01:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 21:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Geng Jiaqi

Geng Jiaqi is a Chinese footballer who is playing for Chinese Super League club Shanghai East Asia. He had played in a 2013 Chinese FA Cup match against another Chinese Super League club Qingdao Jonoon on 10 July 2013.Source:[1] According to WP:NFOOTBALL, this page is notable because this match was between two teams that both came from fully professional league (Chinese Super League). I contested the nomination and explained the reason in both talk pages of Geng Jiaqi and the nominator, however, it was ignored and was deleted without explanation. -Alexchen4836 (talk) 03:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. As this was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Zijie, it will not be restored here. You need to approach user Ymblanter (talk), the admin who closed the deletion discussion, present your evidence and ask for permission to re-create. If then not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy to be alive

unknowingly deleted my article -Vikas.manchikatla (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. The continual re-creation of a non-notable page will eventually lead to you being blocked for disruption. Please review the purpose of an encyclopedia before editing further ES&L 09:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

"Chen Da" article was deleted; request for advice

reasoning -JoanX.Chen (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Dear Wikipedia editor, I have not been able to access Wikipedia for a long time and I do comprehend that the article on Chen Da has been deleted. Chen Da is acknowledged in several major academic works by American and Chinese musicologists as the no.1 folk singer in Post World War II Taiwan. (The references were quoted properly by me in the deleted article.) Several Wikipedia entries on Chinese and Taiwanese music - respectively Taiwanese folk music - share this view that he is important. The name Chen Da is emphasized by red in these Wikipedia articles (even an Italian one), indicating that an entry on Chen Da is desired. - It is clear that the article proposed was too long. Perhaps I found "too much information" on his musical style (including refs giving the books quoted). And perhaps there were "too many details" on his biography (plus the necessary references). - It is also clear that my style should have been more neutral, perhaps. I tried to be sober and neutral but obviously I like the person and think highly of his achievement. This may have colored my style and therefore the article. I would have appreciated help by other Wikipedia editors who are more experienced. I ask for advice as I have always appreciated helpful polite advice.

Note: this was an abandoned articles for creation entry, not an article as of yet: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Chen_Da_(Chinese_folk_singer), and therefore G13 ES&L 10:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, ES&L, saved me some hunting about. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I think this is clearly a notable person and Wikipedia should have an article about him: also, it sounds as though you already have the right idea about how it should be improved - more neutral tone, and slimmed down to concentrate on his notable achievements rather than every detail of his life-story. There are links in the box at the top to sources of help. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Caressa Savage

reasoning -69.254.30.60 (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Nov. 8th. A more thorough and complete bio can be written and verified on this actress. 2 AVN Awards won.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Epbr123 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Mohammad Sharif Chattar

reasoning -Wikimaniabot (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

This article was victim of speedy deletion on grounds of google search which itself is not reliable source. There are countries which embraced internet very late and as a result they lack in promoting important personalities, events or places to wider world. This personality is considered a legend in Azad Kashmir and he took fight againt illiteracy and militancy in educational insituituitons when Malala Yousafzai was not even born. It will be injustice against Pakistan's fight against illitercay and fundamentalism if this personality is not remembered, who has hundereds of thousands of students accross the world. When mythical characters, dacoits or infamous thieves and robbers are given place on wikipedia pages then this article should also be given chance, whicch is about a real person who took the war against illiteracy single handedly. I therefore request for republishing the article so that more references could be produced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimaniabot (talk • contribs) 06:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - this was not a speedy deletion but a proposed deletion, so the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Nsk92 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Better references are essential, both to satisfy the non-optional policy Wikipedia:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Saints Way

I, 86.19.155.70, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 86.19.155.70 (talk) 09:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review. Please edit and update it and submit as soon as convenient: "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Leon (Lee) Ousby - Actor

Reasoning - 16:05, 7 November 2013 Yunshui (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Leon (Lee) Ousby - Actor (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)Leon (Lee) Ousby - Actor (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

No speedy deletion, just.deleated, when I checked the editor,s users page that was self promoting. So I don' understand.

Hello sir, you do seem like a busy man. My user page User:Leon (Lee) Ousby was deleted on the grounds of self promotion. At the top of the page I ask editors if the can contact me before editing. I am actually possibly promoting a lot of notable people and universities more so.

I would like the page restored as I have a lot more to add, am waiting for more sources and references to come through. It's also fun. All that is there is true and no kick back would come back at WikipediaLeon (Lee) Ousby - Actor (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. This is quite unsuitable for Wikipedia. I am sorry that nobody has yet explained to you what Wikipedia is (a project to build an encyclopedia), and more importantly what it is not. Among many other things, it is not a social-networking site, or a webhost for blogs or for people to write about themselves.
Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

You may find some ideas at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. If you like, I will be happy to email you the contents of the page for you to post somewhere else. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC).
Hi John. Thanks for the feedback. I had no idea about the user page aspect. I assumed that I could write true events with reliables sources/bio etc.. I would be glad if you could email the contents of the page to post elsewhere, thank you for your time. I know you're all volunteers and you have a lot to do. Best wishesLeon (Lee) Ousby - Actor (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 Done - text emailed. I apologise again that we do not explain ourselves better. Personally, I would like potential users to have to read before signing up half a screen of advice about what Wikipedia is and is not for; but the general view is that no obstruction should be put in a potential user's way. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Dark Doctor

solid references and facts have come to light. A new trailer shows more information about the subject that needs yo be placed in the deleted article -Mcs2050wiki (talk) 15:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted, only today, after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Doctor, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Everything Engine

I'm currently working on improving the Everything2 article. Several years ago, an article on the Everything Engine (which I recreated as a redict) was deleted on notability grounds. Although I haven't seen it yet, I think some of the content of this old page might be appropriate for the Everything2#Software subsection on the Everything2 article. Can someone go back to the deleted text and copy it to my userspace so I look through this and see what is appropriate? Thank you, thank you! -—mako๛ 13:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done. The first version was actually deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everything Engine. I have emailed you a copy of the text, which doesn't seem likely to be helpful to you. In fact, I rather hope it isn't because if you do want to use any of it, we shall have to do some sort of undelete/history merge to provide attribution. Let me know. JohnCD (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Skulpturstopp

reasoning -WesselKK (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC) I disagree with my article being an unambiguous promotion of this project. My aim is to inform about the fact that this project exists in Eastern Norway: sculptures by internationally renowned artists at four locations in Eastern Norway. Four more sculptures at another four locations are under planning. The sculptures are given by Sparebankstiftelsen DNB to the municipalities. The sculptures are placed in the landscape and are accessible to all at no cost. There are no commercial interests in the project.

The project is in many ways similar to Artscape Nordland. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artscape_Nordland Should I rewrite my article in the format of the Wikipedia article of Artscape Nordland?

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:WesselKK/Skulpturstopp. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Advice on your talk page later today, or maybe tomorrow. JohnCD (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Rodolfo Augusto Fiorini

79.37.190.241 (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Checking this, there is no article of his listed in Gooogle Scholar with more than 8 citations. I think the chance of meeting the WP:PROF notability standard is extremely low. DGG ( talk ) 19:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Jamiululoom_ambur

reasoning -117.204.30.42 (talk) 06:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

If you leave a message here while logged in to your account, I will "userfy" the article for you - move it into a sub-page in your user space where you can work on it. If you do not have an account, it is easy and free to WP:REGISTER one. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teebone

Article was deleted due to G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion, I do not believe that the content of the article reflects this decision. -CheriBomb (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done I agree that this isn't advertising, but the article makes no demonstration of his significance, i.e. it doesn't demonstrate that he's important enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia, so if I restored it, it would immediately be eligible for speedy deletion for lack of significance. You need to include content explaining why Teebone is significant enough for a general worldwide encyclopedia, and you need to include citations to reliable sources: books from reliable publishers, academic journals, government websites, etc. Please note two other things: (1) I would be happy to restore it if you would agree to have it moved to your userspace. There you could work on it at your leisure, since the lack-of-significance thing doesn't apply in userspace. (2) If you come back here and explain why he's significant, that will be sufficient, since it's something that could simply be added to the article upon its restoration. Nyttend (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Chatterbox (1977 film)

I, Shemp Howard, Jr., request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. The page was deleted because it hadn't been updated in six month and I was a day late getting the additional information I was requested to add (on the critical reaction to the movie). I went to add the information and it had already been deleted. I did NOT see a deadline. The movie was a big hit in the Golden Age of Porn and helps illustrate the ancient myth of "vagina loquens." Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

 Question: I don't understand why you want the AfC submission Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chatterbox (1977 film) undeleted? There is already an article about this film in the main encyclopedia at Chatterbox (1977 film). If you have new information, add it there. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Not done Purely because you created the article a day later, and it's still there with precisely the same content. Nyttend (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry -- misunderstood. I thought it was deleted from there. Will add that information. Thanks!Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 21:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emeritus Professor Norman Maclean.jpg

OTRS 2013100110006976 raised with an offer to release copyright for the 1 files listed. I would like to see the image page for additional verification before confirming. This does not preclude speedy deleting if verification fails or if unsuitable for other (non-copyright) reasons. -Fæ (talk) 16:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

@Fæ:  Done Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Ninjamock

reasoning -Pastorgluk (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The text of this article shows it is a brand new startup and so it is highly unlikely there exist third party sources to sustain notability and could be used to create a verifiable article. Moreover, is appears the text may have been a copyright violation of the text at the company's facebook page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Nasim Basiri

Dear sir/ Madame , I just wanted to inform you that this page does not have any connection with its contributor, the thing is that I made this username just because I am a fan of Nasim Basiri and her works , I hope you will take neccessary actions not to delete this article on one of the greatest Iranian writers and feminists. Thanks -Nasimbasiri (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. The request for speedy deletion was already declined by an administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Milton

I, 211.27.148.110, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 211.27.148.110 (talk) 04:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Byambarinchin Bayart-Od

I, Baigalkhuu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Baigalkhuu (talk) 05:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

  •  Done look at the history to see earlier revisions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Malaysian Students' Council of Australia

If the source code of the page could be retrieved, corrections could be done in order for the same page that adheres to Wikipedia's rules to be restored in the future -Raj28sharan (talk) 11:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.masca.org.au/index.php/10-gantry. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Theodore "Ted" Herrick

reasoning -Hello Tyme (talk) 14:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodore "Ted" Herrick , it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Lord zaton

Please dont delete my page i merely wanted to create a page for a character i created it means a lot to me Please dont delete it i didnt mean to break the rules -Lord zaton (talk) 16:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ILW.com

I, Elena149, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Elena149 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

the chop

The article described one of only two Satirical news sites in New Zealand, and has been covered in the Press which was referenced. It's significance is in the fact that it is only one of two such sites that exist. The only other satirical site has an entry in Wikipedia, it seems unfair that The Chop does not. -Jsmuso (talk) 23:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies or websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Being one of only two things, doesn't mean that either thing is notable and WP:OSE doesn't matter. Toddst1 (talk) 01:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Rosewill

basic information about company, crucial for customers -204.89.152.90 (talk) 23:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to assert any semblance of importance and does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. Beyond that, Wikipedia is not here for the benefit of your customers or your company. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your company and its services. Toddst1 (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Caressa Savage page

reasoning -Jinxee6966 (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC) This may not be the right place for this- I'm new. Sorry if true. I have a complete bio on this actress. She should be included on this site. She was in the industry 10 yrs. Working as a G/G performer. I saw the 7 day cut-off and since I don't know how to do this was afraid I might not be able to learn how to do this and get it edited in time, what do I need to do?

@Jinxee6966: The page has already been restored as a result of a previous request. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Bassketeers

Cause it Doesn't have any mistake with it -Ahmadhadi19 (talk) 04:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Laura Montgomery

Article deleted as an expired Prod in April 2010 due to failing WP:ATHLETE notability guidleines (she is a footballer who was not "fully professional" and did not play at international level). But she has continued to get coverage as the co-owner/founder and manager of Glasgow City F.C. eg. [2] [3] So I'm asking if the article can be put in my userspace for me to improve and try and get it to a point where it would survive an AfD. Thanks. -Clavdia chauchat (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Jin ho Choy

Please wait for editing -Kofst1254 (talk) 08:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

 Not done as article is not deleted. Speedy delete was declined already However you will need to add some real independent references to help this article survive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:The Magic School Bus title credit.jpg

It should replace the DVD cover used in The Magic School Bus (TV series). -George Ho (talk) 08:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done Please use this image or it will be deleted again in a week. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

MEETS (cable system)

Clearly the user that deleted this is being malicious or simply doesn't understand the subject matter. There are 100's of pages like this one that document the various undersea and terrestrial cables around the globe. In many cases it's only Wikipedia that documents these systems that make up the global Internet. Thanks in advance. Martin. -Mahtin (talk) 23:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Done topic had heaps of online refs, so clearly notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
  1. ^ https://www.ableton.com/en/education/certified-training/us/abid-hussain-new-orleans-la-and-dallas-tx/
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_105&oldid=1138663561"