Wikipedia:Peer review/My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy/archive1
My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because after it was quickly withdrawn from FA despite my hard work, the book sources which I initially missed that caused this have now been heavily integrated by me and to make sure these are up to scratch as well as anything else not being missing before a re submission to FA, I would very much appreciate a peer review from one of my fellow editors!
Thanks, K. Peake 21:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: It has been over a month since this has been posted. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I am, still looking for the FAC but Wiki has been dead recently. K. Peake 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: It has been over a month since this has been posted. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comments by The Herald
The article looks pretty close to FA standards than most PR ones. Not an expert, but I got some pointers which can be helpful.
- Condo's statement about the publicity stunt needs a reference.
- I'm pretty sceptical about the Amazon references used.
- 3rd paragraph of recording and production could get a few more inline cites. Right now, the entire thing and the quote is covered in just one cite.
- Widely considered West's best album, it is ranked in several curated lists as the best album of the 2010s and among the greatest of all time. Such a POV statement needs multiple references to back it up in the body.
- You may run IA bot for archiving links.
Altogether, the article is in excellent shape and looks good to go. You may incorporate my points into consideration. Thanks and good luck :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Herald Thanks a lot, I have done all I can to work these in and the article should be good for FA – please leave any comments if you do feel ready as I will now nominate! --K. Peake 13:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)