Wikipedia:Peer review/Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey)/archive1

Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey)[edit]

This article was recently expanded, and had a failed GA nomination (although it is currently under review). Any and all tips to make it a better article would be much appreciated. -- NORTH ^talk 00:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the use of template:scaps in the exit list. We're talking about the exit leading to Route 33 east, not trying to duplicate exactly what's on the exit sign. --NE2 01:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's an issue with the exit list guide, not the article. -- NORTH ^talk 04:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although now that I look at the talk page for the exit list guide, there clearly wasn't any consensus to use {{scaps}}, and one of the examples on the guide doesn't use it. Gawrsh, am I embarrassed. (I still think that it would be best to have a full discussion on WT:IH/ELG rather than here or on the I-295 talk page.) -- NORTH ^talk 04:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 21:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I implemented the only suggestion I thought was applicable – the non-breaking space between units – putting the   in for one; on the one that was just an approximation, I spelled out the number "five".

The only images that do not have captions are the shield images, which do have captions in the sense that the route is linked to immediately after the image. The article obviously does have an infobox, and the only date that isn't linked to (that I could find) is in the title of a reference.

There might be some issue with overlinkage in some editors' eyes, but I think all the links are relatively spaced out (with the exception of inside the exit list). Also, if there's any copyedits someone can catch, feel free to fix them – I might be somewhat inept since it's mostly my writing. -- NORTH ^talk 00:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]