Wikipedia:Peer review/Die Another Day/archive1

Die Another Day[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
It's a Good Article. Thanks, Ultra! 08:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

Explain CGI before abbreviating it.
Robert Wade in infobox is a dab.
Explain NSA before abbreviating it. Same with HALO and WMD.
British English should be used so pressurisation not pressurization etc...
Surfing image caption is a fragment so no need for a full stop.
"The cut happened as requested," - was made?
"...was voted 9th out of 22 and was voted..." reads clumsily.
Three citations in the References to other films section is insufficient.
The whole of "advertising campaign" section needs help with spelling, WP:HEAD, WP:CITE etc..
Link Royal Albert Hall.
"On the very first day" spot the redundant word.
References should use {{cite web}} and not be raw urls.

That should help a bit on the way to something like FAC... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bzuk (talk · contribs)

Interesting article, generally well written but major issues with referencing formats, not only use of bare urls, lack of author notes, mix of dating styles. Contact me for assistance. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]