Wikipedia:Peer review/Astrodatabank/archive1

Astrodatabank[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because, I wish to improve the article as a GA and, as FA for future.

Thanks, Junosoon (talk) 07:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An image would be nice. See WP:LOGOS for more info using logos. Subheadings and paragraphs with only one sentence are not ideal in my opinion. I would recommend merging or expanding some of these lonely sentences. There is an excessive number of references for an article this size. See WP:Citation overkill for more information on selecting references. Hope this helps.Dig Deeper (talk) 22:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]