Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pinky and the Brain/1

Pinky and the Brain[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result: Delist. Geometry guy 21:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here goes:

Lead does not summarize article. Do we really need a quote in the article, especially one that is only allegedly the tagline? The lead also seems to suggest that the article is about the characters and not the show.
Most of Pinky's description is unsourced.
Large portions of "Production" are unsourced.
No section on critical reception.

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you've transcluded this to the GAR page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it transcluded automatically. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It takes an hour (when the bot is working). See also WP:PURGE. Geometry guy 22:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Poorly cited and difficult to understand for someone who has not watched an episode. Ten Pound Hammer's concerns are spot-on. Geometry guy 00:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per TenPoundHammer, plus: The lead needs to be expanded to sufficiently cover the article. 32 out of 53 of the current references are to individual episodes, ref 50 (Gookie) is to a Google group, there are a couple of references to IMDB. There does seem to be some sort of a reception section by the name of "Reponse", but parts of it read more like a list of trivia. Anyway, overall, not GA quality. Dana boomer (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]