Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mooncake

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2012 at 14:12:13 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Brandmeister t 14:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Technical aspects: Blown highlights on the cake, heavily visible. Aesthetic aspects: Looks poor on a plain white background, a little context would be better. Encyclopedic aspects: I'd prefer something at least hinting at how it is consumed (~~those don't quite look like the mooncakes available here, but then Mrs. Crisco bought green ones...~~) Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's nian gao she bought... duh Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is an original background, but 5 out of 9 current food and drink FPs have similar neutral background and the cake is not something sophisticated to show how it's consumed :) Brandmeister t 21:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit 1 Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All Limited depth of field. Original per Crisco. PLW's edit has plate marks and the bottom left of the plate still visible. I'd be most happy with the original version over either of these edits. JJ Harrison (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per JJ. Pteronura brasiliensis 19:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, food FPC are very hard to pass. The food has to be literally perfect. Any slight imperfection in the food will give an oppose. Here, the background is a bit hazy at the edges, and there are minor blemishes on the mooncake: i.e the creases/cuts/whatever at the lower right of the mooncake--Nanoman657 (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]