Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Goat family

Goat family.jpg[edit]

Reason: I don't think any other image can describe any better a goat and her two little kids.
Articles this image appears in: Goat Mammal
Creator: Fir0002

Support as nominator — Arad 14:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oppose - we just had a goat photo nominated by the same photographer. This photo seems to have the same strengths and same weaknesses. This is practically a renomination; let's wait and see how the other nom goes. Debivort 19:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a reason to oppose. This one is different. There is a female goat in it! --Arad 21:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to it's logical extent, this becomes an obviously valid reason to oppose: "You can't oppose this nearly identical goat picture! This one has 5 blades of grass instead of 6!"Debivort 07:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't serious about my comment above. But I still believe it's OK to have 2 feature worthy images of same subject. Also this is a mature goat (the real subject) the other one are baby goats. --Arad 09:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arad is right, there no limmit on how many similar pics can be nominated --Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 22:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opppose you cant see the darker goat fully --Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 22:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oppose The other FPC is better. ^8thstar 00:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm going to buck the trend here for what its worth. This is a quality image and does illustrate the domestic goat pretty well. I'm starting to see some pretty anally retentive opposes in voting here these days. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 20:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 11:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]