Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by 127 Hours/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:10, 24 July 2011 [1].

---

List of accolades received by 127 Hours

List of accolades received by 127 Hours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by 127 Hours/archive1

Nominator(s): Crystal Clear x3 14:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. Crystal Clear x3 14:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫Share–a–Power[citation needed] 12:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

*Comments link "Utah" in lead? done dmy dates or mdy dates? I see you are using 99% the former. done could make the "Date of ceremony" bigger, so that the dates will fit in one line. done ref 32: avoid allcaps titles done ref 4: Mike Bruno fixed ref 26: Eric Ditzian fixed ref 13: Robert Wilonsky? And BTW, how reliable is this blog? I've always been under the impression that it was a RS, but I've left a question over at the FLC talkpage. I've fixed the author ref 35: Kilday-- fixed ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫Share–a–Power[citation needed] 18:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments Infobox (a) image caption needs a full stop (b) Awards & Nominations -> Accolades (or Awards & nominations) done "feature limited United States and United Kingdom releases " why not just "limited releases in the United States and United Kingdom" and then have a less confusing link (i.e. you can link "limited release" rather than pipe link "limited"... done Not terribly keen on the thicker lines between award types but just personal preference. I usually just keep them in every awards list since awhile back (I think at my Precious FLC) someone said to add them so it would be easier to read Do you need all those super-categories since 127 hours has its own category? done (removed bio films and films made by danny boyle as the page already has a template) Crystal Clear x3 22:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC) The Rambling Man (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

• Table needs row and col scope for accessibility.

huh?

I take it you mean "Could you explain that please?" - see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (accessibility)/Data tables tutorial. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I think I've corrected it now Crystal Clear x3 23:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

No, you need "scope="col"" for column headers, and "scope="row"" for row headers. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea as to how to do that. Could you please show me an example? =/Crystal Clear x3 14:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

That's why I linked the data table tutorial. Look at this for how I added "col scopes" and the first "row scope" in the table. It's for screen readers. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

• Support... And do note that, yes, I did copyedit this article at the end of June. Bobnorwal (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 16:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments – "It amounted 35.8 million at the box office". Amounted? Is that what they normally say? I thought it would have been something else. Changed to "grossed" The photo caption has a stray apostrophe at the end that needs removal. done Remove all caps from title of reference 6 ("AWARDS"). done In reference 17, the newspaper Evening Standard should be italicized. done What makes Alternative Film Guide (refs 38 and 39) a reliable source? Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC) I've seen it used in plenty of other FLs but I've left a question on the FL talk page just in case I'm wrong about it being an RS Crystal Clear x3 03:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC) After talking to User:Dabomb87 I think it's safe to say it's an RS. Crystal Clear x3 03:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Ruby2010 comment! 20:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments from Ruby2010 MTV Movie Award -> MTV Movie Awards done Is there no URL for ref 24? There was, but then it became a deadlink =/. So I decided to make it like a tree link. Ref 36's publisher should be the International Press Academy, not Satellite Awards done I notice you have a lot of secondary sources (rather than primary, like the awards' direct website). Could you try and convert the citations to the award show's direct websites (instead of sites like Awards Daily)? Primary is always better A problem there is that quite a few of the award ceremonies cited in the list are pretty low-key and do not even have official websites, or posts about the nominations/wins get updated/removed soon (such as the Saturn Awards). Like for example, the Las Vegas Society and St Louis awards's websites only lists its winners [2] [3], which would be fine if 127 Hours had won all of its nominations. However, for something like the London Critics Circle I could source it through their official site, but with The Utah one, I used indieWIRE instead. K. I know it's difficult to find obscure award sources, but just wanted to be sure you had tried all their websites first Ruby2010 comment! 14:38, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Independent Spirit Awards has one win (typo in infobox) done Again with infobox, Santa Barbara International Film Festival gave one nomination, not five done Again with infobox, St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association is repeated twice Really? I only counted it once..... Look again: Santa Barbara International Film Festival 1 1 St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association 1 5 Satellite Awards 0 9 Screen Actors Guild 0 1 Southeastern Film Critics Association 1 2 St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association 1 5 Toronto Film Critics Association By bad, corrected Again with infobox, Utah Film Critics Association gave two noms, not three done Crystal Clear x3 06:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Again with the infobox, I count 24 wins and 136 noms (you should recount to be sure) Ruby2010 comment! 14:38, 20 July 2011 (UTC) -Ruby2010 comment! 03:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC) done Crystal Clear x3 19:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Support Overall a nice list. Ruby2010 comment! 20:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Support – A very good list. Novice7 (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.