Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ivy discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC) [1].

---

Ivy discography

Ivy discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Ivy discography/archive1

Nominator(s): Carbrera (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it satisfies all of the required criterion and is well sourced and worded. Any constructive criticism and comments are highly appreciated. Thank you! Carbrera (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC).

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments I guess "After singing to" should be "After signing to"? Done The word "release" appears 13 times in 15 sentences. Sometimes twice in a single sentence. This is somewhat repetitive, needs mixing up a bit. Done – Reduced to seven times. Carbrera (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC). " music video was Ivy's video to be" missing something here. Done " to the public" not sure this is strictly necessary. Done "were made available for purchase as its singles" I find this awkward reading. Done "the UK Singles Chart in the United Kingdom" I think the "UK" gives it away that it's in the United Kingdom... Done Tables need footnotes explaining the purpose of the (em?) dashes. Done Promo singles table caption needs "promotional" in there. Done The Rambling Man (talk) 10:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC) The Rambling Man – Thank you very much. Please let me know if anything else needs to be completed. Carbrera (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC).

Comments from Aoba47

• I would rephrase "Additionally, the accompanying music video was Ivy's first video and was released in 1995." to avoid the repetition of the word "video".

Done

• I would rephrase "to record Apartment Life, their second album in October 1997." as "to record their second album Apartment Life, released in October 1997." as the current phrasing could be read as their second studio album in that specific time period.

Done

• All of the band's music appears to be available on iTunes so I believe should you add "digital download" to the first studio albums with additional references to support the new information. Same comment applies to the EP Lately.

I actually did not include "digital download" on the first two since the original release did not occur digitally, but for Realistic it did occur originally on cassette, CD, and LP... etc. I don't know if that makes sense or not. I've noticed how that's also how it's displayed on FLs like Madonna albums discography. Let me know. Carbrera (talk) 02:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC).

Wonderful work with this list. Once my comments are addressed. I will support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Aoba47 – I addressed your comments. Thank you, Carbrera (talk) 02:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC).

• Thank you for addressing my comments. I support this nomination. Good luck with it. Aoba47 (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments from IndianBio

• I'm confused by their single releases from the lead. Lately was their first EP, but its single was not released until 1996, so singles from their first album Realistic—"Get Enough" and "Don't Believe a Word"—was released first. The problem is that the prose here gives the feeling that "I Hate December" was the first single to be released while the table shows something different. I believe a copy edit and restructuring of this portion is needed.

Done

• In 2000, Long Distance was sold in Japan --> Do we really need this info? I could have understood if it was only released in Japan, but it was released in the US also. Why don't we simplify it as "Their third album Long Distance was released in Japan in 2000, and the next year in the US".

Done – revised accordingly. Carbrera (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC).

• In a joint venture between Unfiltered Records and Minty Fresh --> This is WP:OR because neither the album article nor in the lead there is a source that this was a joint venture. Multiple records can be associated with a project if the artist hsa signed to both of them, which seems the case here. Does not mean that it was a joint venture per say.

Done – removed. Carbrera (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC).

• I am curious now, what is the reason that the band has signed/changed so many record labels? Their first four releases all have different labels so if we have that information it would be a good addition. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

IndianBio – I addressed your first three comments in the list; thank you. Regarding your fourth one, I cannot find anything specific regarding their label switching, although I'm sure it has something to do with their lack of commercial success. They might have left Atlantic due to studio fire that occurred in 1997, but I can't say for sure and I don't think that piece of information would work well here. Thank you for the review. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC).

• Support – Looks fine to me. I'm actually a fan of your work on Gwen Stefani & Barbra Streisand related articles for quite some time now. Good luck with your upcoming projects. Damian Vo (talk) 12:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
• Support – Didn't spot any problems with this one. Nice work. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Damian Vo, Giants2008 – Thank you both! Carbrera (talk) 04:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC).

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 01:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.