Wikipedia:Featured article review/Pneumonia/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:28, 17 August 2009 [1].

Pneumonia[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Large sections of this article remain unreferenced.
Management section needs more details ( different treatments for different subgroups )
No section on the social implications such as economics
Public health measures

--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Referencing is inadequate (in my opinion, not even adequate for GA standard). The x-ray in the "Investigations" section looks more like a pleural effusion rather than pneumonia. Axl ¤ [Talk] 22:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, comprehensiveness, alt text. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ? YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 00:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per Doc James. Grossly inadequate citations. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. The lack of citations is the biggest concern. It'd take a lot of work to fix that. Eubulides (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Agree --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above concerns. No one is working on the article. It is not being actively edited. —mattisse (Talk) 17:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.