Wikipedia:Featured article review/Phil Collins/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:33, 31 January 2010 [1].
Phil Collins[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Accurizer, McMarmite, Thisisbossi, AreJay, Ataricodfish, WP Progressive Rock, WP London, WP Rock music, WP Musicians
This is a 2006 promotion with citation needed tags, unformatted citations, uncited text, dead links, and the usual smattering of MOS issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 05:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I just returned an issue of Mojo to the local university library featuring an article that dealt with Collins' career with Genesis. Unfortunately I can't check it back out, for I had to have a friend check it out for me in the first place (stupid borrowing rules denying alumni lending privileges for periodicals . . .) WesleyDodds (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Featured article criterion concerns are referencing, MOS. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no one working on it, no progress since I nominated it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, as SandyGeorgia states, almost nothing has been done to the article since it was nominated for FAR. Large chunks of unsourced text are the major issue. Dead links, improperly formatted references and lack of alt text are secondary issues. A review of the images and sound clips is needed - eight of the ten are fair-use, some with FURs missing completely and others that are very bare-bones. Of the other two, one is missing author information. Dana boomer (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.