Wikipedia:Featured article review/John Brooke-Little/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 7:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) [1].

John Brooke-Little[edit]

Notified: RetiredUser2, Evadb, WP Heraldry and vexillology, WP Biography, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Oxford, 2018-2-25 and 2020-12-27

Review section[edit]

An old 2006 promotion that is not up to the modern standards. Bits of unsourced text as noticed by Chetsford on the article talk page back in 2018, the citation to the "Old Claymoresian Society" doesn't quite look high-quality RS, and there's some stuff on article talk about possible close paraphrasing issues. Not the most decayed I've seen, but this needs some attention. Primary author has made one edit since 2009, so I don't think we can expect help from that direction. Hog Farm _Talk 01:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC No edits whatsoever since nomination for FAR fixing these issues, still not up to modern FA standards. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC in addition to the above, I notice a lot of citations that aren't properly formatted and a lot of missing ISBNs. Page views are averaging 10 a day; no non-bot activity on the talk page since 2009, and fewer than 50 edits since 2012. It's abundantly clear this one's just gathering dust. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC - No human edits in 2021, issues remain unaddressed. Hog Farm _Talk 20:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, paraphrasing, and style. DrKay (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist no progress, request for sources outstanding as of 2018. FemkeMilene (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
'Delist per my concerns. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - Comments on talk have been outstanding since 2018, and this hasn't been worked on. Hog Farm _Talk 17:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist No significant work since review has started. Z1720 (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.