Wikipedia:Featured article review/Belgrade/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC) [1].

Belgrade[edit]

Notified: Abductive, Hadžija, Duja, No such user, WEBDuB, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Serbia, WikiProject Cities, Feb 22

Review section[edit]

I am nominating this featured article for review because the article needs significant improvement. Parts of the article aren't cited and other parts need updating. Some sections such as tourism are bloated and need a concise rewrite. See Sandy's detailed list on talk. (t · c) buidhe 04:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is not up to par, the history section seems well-referenced but significant parts of the rest aren't. An example that I noticed was how here's a whole fashion section but its first and only (?) inline reference is to an "about us" page of a fashion event, which is probably just a primary source. A lot of the e.g. weather statistics aren't well referenced inline, either. The article needs a fair bit of work to regain featured status. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC: no edits since Buidhe's nomination. Uncited sections exist in lots of places. Z1720 (talk) 00:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC no edits since 30 April 2022‎. Issues unresolved (t · c) buidhe 01:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, and an intrepid editor might also consider shifting some text to History of Belgrade and consolidating here. CMD (talk) 02:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, issues are unaddressed. Hog Farm _Talk 14:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, per comments above. CMD (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist lack of improvement (t · c) buidhe 00:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist issues remain, no edits since April. Z1720 (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist a fair bit of work needed. Hog Farm _Talk 01:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.