Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trusted Computing/archive1

Trusted Computing[edit]

Well written, with some interesting viewpoints on the future of computing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wrobbo (talk • contribs) .

Oppose. There are citation needed tags and links should be made into refs. I don't get the point of Image:Trusted Computing3.png. Maybe move the link to that video near the top of the External links? The external links could be sorted and grouped according to content.WP 09:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opppose. There's some high-quality prose in this article, and is probably one of the most neutral and informative presentations of the subject anywhere on the Internet, but it really still needs a lot of clean-up, sourcing of statements, and possibly some pictures/diagrams. Some of the speculative text needs to be sourced or removed, too. -/- Warren 10:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There are only 6 in-line citations. Great writing, but on an FA article I'd expect at least 30, and on a tech article like this, where references are easier to obtain 40-50 wouldn't be surprising. Damn fine NPOV though. Don't be discouraged by the opposes- this article can be cleaned up nicely and pass FAC with flying colors with a little effort. --PresN 21:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there are still some section of the italian article ( which is a "featured article") i haven't translated , give me a little time . if you want some picturezs , there are a lot of pictures in the italian article. . Dbiagioli 12:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Dbiagioli[reply]

Oppose Not nearly enough references, and some rather unprofessional vernacular (like the image with the words "who's in your PC?"). --Kitch 17:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]