Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/All That/archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All That[edit]

Self nom and for: I have revised this article well. It is currently a good article, and I want to take it further. I grew up watching this show, and I think the article is amazing in its current form. PF4Eva 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Object Too listy, stubby sections, refs go at the end of punctuation not in the middle of a sentence, some photo captions too big, big block quotes are distracting. Rlevse 00:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment:The only real list in the whole article is the full cast list, which I believe to be necessary unless told otherwise. Is it all right if the cast introductions for Season 1 and the 10th anniversary are converted to prose or something to keep the captions shorter and simpler? PF4Eva 00:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Object Some parts of the article just look like a really long list, and the rest just looked like a bunch of stubs sloppily pieced together. - Stretchyrubberbands( Tell me how to overcome my stupidity) 07:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Object per above and lack of otherwise better references. This was quite the popular show and has a number of famous alums, some better sourcing might help with further expansion and streamlining. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: As for the references, those are the best I can give you. Trust me, I have searched high and low for pages and articles online relating to All That. It's especially hard when it's a Nickelodeon show from the 1990s and when it has such a common title that is hard to google. But I will do the best I can to improve this article for FA consideration. PF4Eva 00:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]