User talk:Zuzufam

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) Events, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) Events (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 1AmNobody24 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) Events and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nobody (talk) 08:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Zuzufam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nobody (talk) 08:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Good morning. Would it more more appropriate that I add some of this material to what exists regarding PCA events in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_particle_event? I could easily do that. It's not about having my own article...it's about having as much correct info out there as possible. Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 15:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Zuzufam, it's most times easier to add to an existing article then create a new one due to the notability requirements for a new article. And if theres more content later on it can always be split into a separate one. Nobody (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Roger that. I did go ahead and make sweeping edits to the original draft. I focused entirely on three references that, I believe, will meet the requirements of in-depth and reliable. My hope is to initially get an approval for that, then I'll continue to add content and appropriate references along the way. Thank you for your feedback. Zuzufam (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Most of the draft is unsourced and makes conclusions like "Apparently the initial distribution of SEPs is not homogeneous. As such, absorption due to PCA events is initially not uniform throughout the region, described as being somewhat "patchy." Over time as the PCA event matures the effects expand to fill the polar cap. As the event dissipates over time the patchy characteristic returns until the event concludes" and "Understanding the nature of PCA events allows those that rely on HF communications to prepare for and adapt to communications disruptions due to PCA events. Understanding the mechanisms that cause PCA events allows space weather forecasters to assist those that rely on HF communication to have advanced warning of PCA events and forewarning of potential consequences." Things like "The OCB is critical to other topics in space physics including planetary magnetospheres and magnetosphere-ionosphere (M-I) coupling" needs attribution (according to whom). See also WP:Original research, WP:NPOV and WP:Words to watch. S0091 (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

thanks. Those are things I can work with. I have an abundance of sources. An abundance. Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

…just please don’t speedy delete so I can work on it. Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) Events

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) Events requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8924&context=etd. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Equine-man (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This is my work. Digital Commons is the Institutional Repository for Utah State University students. The article I'm preparing is taken directly from my PhD research. They are, in fact, my words. On the Digital Commons website it states this under Permissions: "Effective January 2021, content in the IR will be available under open licensing or Creative Commons By Attribution (CC-BY) Licenses unless noted otherwise in individual items." If it need to cite my work specifically that 's fine, I can do that. How do I proceed? Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 23:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Zuzufam, I did not notice this discussion until after I declined the draft. Please see WP:EXPERT for some guidance. Citing yourself is discouraged. Best to use other sources and/or sources that have cited your work and summarize what they say. If your work has not been widely cited, then it should likely not be used here and certainly should not basis for article. S0091 (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I guess what I don’t understand is that my original work is, in essence, a Wikipedia article, especially the introduction. I took many different sources, most very well known and respected, and using my own words brought them together to introduce the topic I would be covering in the original research. I don’t mention anything at all in the Wiki article about my research, only the review material used to introduce the subject and why it is relevant. Isn’t this the essence of a Wiki article? Any additional guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zuzufam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 06:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. The article is about an important physical phenomena that under certain conditions has been shown to disrupt radio communications, especially for radio waves that propagate through north and south polar regions. The existing article (rather sub-article) is good but lacks much additional info so I figured I could use my expertise and familiarity with the subject to expand the topic to a full-fledged article. It is not an article about me. I receive no compensation regarding this subject. It is purely providing scientific knowledge in a (hopefully) readable format to benefit as many readers as possible. Thanks. Zuzufam (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Just a quick thank you for sending in the email regarding copyright. The template from me above was just a guide so you can familiarise yourself with the rules. I know how difficult it can be, I’ve had to on three occasions cite my own peer reviewed articles as no others were available on a subject matter. Equine-man (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks..It's a work in progress... Zuzufam (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Solar particle event

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Solar particle event, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polar Cap Absorption events (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polar Cap Absorption events and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Polar Cap Absorption events

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Polar Cap Absorption events requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8924&context=etd. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Clearfrienda ^💬 01:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)