User talk:Zippy654

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Zippy654 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JANTWW". The reason given for JANTWW's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Autoblock appears to be working as intended. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JANTWWWWWWWWWWWWW". The reason given for JANTWWWWWWWWWWWWW's block is: "Sock puppetry".

Blocking administrator: CambridgeBayWeather (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Autoblock is still working correctly, and has been upgraded to a direct block, since it's now obvious you are engaging in a good hand/bad hand gambit or something similar. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Zippy654. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zippy654 (talk) 09:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing blocks[edit]

If you wish to appeal your block please request unblocking your talk page (below this message) using the following: {{unblock|Replace this with your reason. ~~~~}}. Make sure you read the guide to appealing blocks before requesting an unblock. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what's my block reason, Callan?

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16621 was submitted on Sep 29, 2016 12:27:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16754 was submitted on Oct 19, 2016 01:49:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16903 was submitted on Nov 15, 2016 03:10:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The fact is, my account was marked as a suspected socker of JANT (insert how many W’s here). Justifying by my actions, I admit that my IP was compromised before, thereby allowing socks to make use of my IP. Therefore, I was unfairly blocked. I just requested full protection for the articel “Groundwater” just to prevent those socks. Callanecc mentioned on the SPI page “Socking at Groundwater and the request for full protection at WP:RFPP gave this away”, and I was suspicious. What did I do wrong? Nothing

Decline reason:

No, this is not what happened. You are the person behind those other accounts. Yamla (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zippy654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit I am the person behind the socks, and I promise never to make another sock, nor another RFP unless needed. My presence here is to revert vandalism, yet it’s a good hand/bad hand gambit by me and the socks. I deeply regret being the sockmaster. Zippy654 (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wot Yamla said. And if I might add, vandal reversion does not count if you are running the vandal account. AND you should make your appeal on the main account/original account six months hence. Please list all your socks so my can make sure they are all dry and fluffy.. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just a few days ago, you were lying to us. Given your history of abuse and lies, why on earth should we believe a promise now? Your best hope is to wait six months from today and apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to explain your deliberate violations of WP:SOCK and your attempt here to lie to us. --Yamla (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]