User talk:Zakksez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archived User talk:Zakksez/1

Please post below this line +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hello[edit]

Hello Zak, this is Afghan Historian (real name Khalid Afridi) from the Pashtun talk page. Just wanted to say hi to a fellow Pakistani Pashtun on here. You sound like an interesting person from your profile. I too love The Lord of the Rings, and was pretty fond of hiking during my days in the Scout movement. Say, I wanted to ask you something, I've been often curious about the Khattak dance of the Pasthuns, which is supposed to be of Greek origin but many are not sure. Do you think it is? What's it usually done for? I would love your help. Thanks! Afghan Historian 07:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, I love Yoda, not jar jar binks. But no matter, I find the Ewoks extremely annoying, although perhaps, now that I think about it, Jar Jar is worse. Nevertheless I'm not into cute cuddly things. I'm also not into the new Star Wars trilogy that much. It was badly written and could have been much much better as one whole movie minus the excessive excrement. Anyway, got class, so tally ho mate! Tamam Shud Afghan Historian 13:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did like Revenge of the Sith a lot more than either Phantom or Attack of the Clones. But yeah, those kids who saw the new ones, might like them. I was a kid too when they came out in the late 90's. But, I was raised to be old-fashioned and more like the baby boom generation in terms of movies and music than my peers. I'm also ridiculed (gently :) ) by many fellow pakistani and indian pals for not liking bollywood. I dont think too much of modern Bollywood films, they're tacky and copy the west too much. Aishwarya Rai isnt that hot and I bet my annoying little sister could attract more guys than her! The old ones are kind of cool though, especially those with Raj Kapoor and Dilip Kumar (both from Peshawar! Not that that's the reason why I like them). I did see Serenity last year and I liked it a lot, to tell you the truth. Its like a Space western, if you want a specific genre. If one wants a good understanding of it, I always reccommend that they see the Firefly tv show on which it was based. I presume you've seen it? Afghan Historian 20:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. I also like some sci fi. It depends. Derivative sci fi is not my cup of tea. Say, sorry for asking you so many questions. I just wanted to get to you know you, as you sound like a very well-read person when it comes to Afghans. But just one more, and I'll leave you alone. Me and an Indian friend of mine were debating over the Partition of India and I was of the opinion that it was carried out badly but theoretically justified, while he thought it was all out wrong. What's your view on this controversial subject? I think that while both countries are historically the same, the inevitable growth of the Muslim population would have started to outnumber the Hindus by this time, had partition not happened, leading to fears among conservative Hindus, massive conflict and possibly, political fragmentation into several separate states. In all, I thought it was a necessary evil to avoid the greater anarchic evil. Afghan Historian 18:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yerzhan Ashykbayev[edit]

Hi, if you have the time I would like your input on whether to delete the article on Yerzhan Ashykbayev, the Foreign Ministry spokesman of the Government of Kazakhstan. Thanks, KazakhPol 18:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how are you[edit]

Zak roriya,

So wraze mekhke ta pe Ihsan Khan AFD debate ke da "Keep" vote achawelai wo. Cha che da debate shuru kerai wo da haghe noom User:A M. Khan de ao da haghe bel kar nishta siwaye da de che arto parto POV AFD debates shuru kre au bya peke da khpelo Sock Puppets sara votona achawee. Pe dagha debate ke da haghe da khyal oo che te yani User:Zakksez zama yo sock puppet ye o dade zikar haghe pe dagha AFD debate ke hum kerai de. Bas domra me wayal che zan tena khabardar sata. Os ee bya ase besa da Salman Shah AFD debate shuru kere da. Khayal ee kawa. --Marwatt 00:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Language Map of Khyber Pukhtukhwa[edit]

Hello,I see you are a member of Pashtun projects. If you know about the subject, you should also know that the maps you keep re-instating is completely wrong. As i stated earlier in multiple talk pages, the map is showing majority pashto speaking areas such as Karak District, Shangla District, Battaggram District, Toorghar District and Buner District as Hindko Speaking, while Tank District is being shown as Saraiki Speaking. The map is of a very bad quality and extemely in accurate, so one wonders why was it allowed to be used in the first place. Also if you are a member of Pashtun project you should yourself be aware that the map being used is inaccurate amd should be removed or replaced. File:Map of Languages of Kyber Pakhtunkha Province.jpg Tigerkhan007 (talk) 21:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any help[edit]

If you need any help on Pekhawar article then let me know as well. Allah pe aman. --Marwat 00:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not blank[edit]

Thanks for pointing out the problem with Pollywood article. But you should not blank pages like this. In such cases you should consider redirecting using:

#REDIRECT [[Target Page]]

Replace Target Page with the page's title you want to redirect to. Blanking is considered vandalism. I you want the page deleted you should tag it for deletion with some explation. You can find such tags in Wikipedia:Deletion Policy pages. Szhaider 02:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SALAMOONA[edit]

DEAR Pashtoon brother salamoona!

I hope you are fine and doing well. I am one of the contributors of Pashto wikipedia in the internet. you can visit Pashto wikipedia website at [1] there you will be able to see some of the information in Pashto language.

The main aim of this message is to invite you to contribute in the pashto wikipedia as well. I know you have done quite a good job in English wikipedia and you are working for the cause of Pashtoons. So please join the Pashto wikipedia and be one of its contributors relating the Pakhtoonkhwa matters. There are only a few active memebers who write in pashto.

i hope to hear soon from you


regards Ahmed Najib Email: anobleboy@gmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.139.154.113 (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Mainwali and Attock[edit]

Zak, I am so sorry for this late reply but these days I am so busy with my PhD thesis that I dont find enough time. I will try to find out something for you and will then let you know. Da khudai pe Aman. -- MARWAT  05:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I know ur name?[edit]

you have done really great job. congratulation. I am Mohammad salim khan from swat pakistan,belongs to a pashtun family. I have written an article on saidu group of teaching hospital swat pakistan. would you like to help me ,how to put a photo? thanks salimswati

Ottoman language Wikipedia[edit]

Hello Zakksez

I am a history teacher from Istanbul, in Turkey. We need your vote [2] for opening Ottoman language wikipedia

--Tarih 21:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rohtas Fort[edit]

Hello,

I see that you like Pukhtun history so how about checking out the Rohtas Fort article. See if you like it, or you can improve it.

Omar mukhtar 06:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bye. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omar mukhtar (talkcontribs) 06:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]


:)[edit]

Thanks for accepting my nomination for the article on FJDC to receive a 'Good Article' status, I'll try and look into the improvement suggestions you have made. Zainub 20:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Aitzaz Ahsan[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Aitzaz Ahsan, by UnitedStatesian, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Aitzaz Ahsan is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Aitzaz Ahsan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Aitzaz Ahsan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Muhammadalipasha.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Muhammadalipasha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 12:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, good suggestions. If you have knowledge of the topic I would appreciate any contributions you might make, if you want to. :) SGGH speak! 21:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks! I'll rumble through those sources and see what I can do! I will have a look at that article you mentioned too if you like. Want to give me a link? Actually, I'll probably find it in your contributions :) SGGH speak! 23:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:March1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:March1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article could use some help — I saw your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani districts and thought you might be interested. - Special-T 14:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Panipat (1761) of Battle of Panipat, i think you may want to submit it to Military History peer review first. This helps fix any problems in the article before it gets put through the A-Class procedure. Any questions can be left on my talk page. Thanks Woodym555 20:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The A-class review has come up with many suggestions to help you improve the article. Now that it has started i would try and act on the reviewers suggestions. I checked the edit history and yes, the improvement is quite remarkable! Well done. I would look at the reviewers suggestions and if you still want to have a peer review first then leave a note on my talk page or on the assessment page. I will then help to get it changed to a peer review. Woodym555 23:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added an oppose to the review. This means i don't yet think it is up to the A-Class assessment criteria. I have left suggestions on how to improve it. I have also created a Lead for you. I don't think there is a template, see other battle featured articles for a basic hint.e.g Lochry's Defeat, Invasion of Tulagi (May 1942) others listed at Wikipedia:Featured articles#Warfare. Hope my suggestions help. Woodym555 14:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the article today to create some subheaders and to follow the milhist guidelines. Check for any errors and feel free to correct them

I also started adding some citation templates and found some problems with the text and its referencing. I have left a detailed summary on the talk page. A quick summary is that much of it the text is copied from a webpage and many of the references are third hand and they need to be properly cited and verified. Thanks Woodym555 15:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Pashtun Articles[edit]

We need to work on getting users like Behnam and Anoshirawan banned or blocked because they are severely vandalising Pashtun culture and Pashtun people related articles. An example is that of Mirwais Khan Hotak and the Hotaki dynasty, where they are trying to show that the Hotaks were not Ghilzai Pashtuns, but were Tatars or Uzbeks.zakka 13:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, the only problem is that I don't know how to make a formal complaint. I've spent a while searching for it but haven't found anything. Do you know how I can make a formal complaint? zakka 18:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panipat 1761[edit]

Glad to know your efforts. Really appreciate them.

Trust you have read T S Shejwalkar's "Panipat 1761",available in both English and Marathi, probably one of the best books on Indian history ever written.

People like Shejwalkar wrote largely in Marathi and hence are not accessible outside.

best, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anikulkarni (talkcontribs) 07:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The map you have put up on the 1761 Panipat war has German legend. Is it possible to get an English one? Secondly, the image of Nanasaheb Peshwa which you have, is I think of Peshwa Nanasaheb II (Nana Sahib) of the 1857 uprising. Could you please confirm this? Salilb (talk) 04:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, the Peshwa pic will have to be removed. As for the map, I think we could let it stay till anyone raises serious objections or manages to change it to English. I dont mind doing the German-English conversion some time, time permitting. BTW, why was the picture of the battle removed? Salilb (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aredshirt.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aredshirt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Redflag-1.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Redflag-1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —dgiestc 17:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's not a poster[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Index r5 c2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kaldari (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Little context in Ameer Haider Khan Hoti[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ameer Haider Khan Hoti, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ameer Haider Khan Hoti is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ameer Haider Khan Hoti, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:4 close.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:4 close.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image permission problem with Image:Index r5 c2.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Index r5 c2.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup[edit]

It's being re-organised, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Manchester 4. Thanks, Majorly talk 18:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation project[edit]

I need some help on a translation project outside wikipedia, would you be interested in helping? --NEMT (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Salaam `alaykum[edit]

What tribe are you, my brother? And alhamdullilah, you are from Peshawar, this is a beautiful city and a sign of Pashtun beauty. My family is originally from Kabul (Muhammadzai) before we left Afghanistan for Pakistan because of the Russian threat. --pashtun ismailiyya 23:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pic of the Maratha soldier[edit]

I think an updated pic of the Maratha soldier is required in the third batttle of Panipat. A Maratha soldier is prominently known to have a white attire and a red pagdi. Kindly help. ThanksKesangh (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of McNamara fallacy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://idiolect.org.uk/notes/?p=388. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published book[edit]

I'm working on compiling a book containing information about almost all Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. The population of a particular ethnic group would be obtain respectively from their diplomatic missions in Pakistan including regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations. I'm not very good with writing so it would be great, if you would like to collaborate with me.--116.71.53.25 (talk) 06:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bugti Marathas and your article on the POWs of Panipat.[edit]

What are your sources for the above article?

Possibly unfree File:Bushra Gohar Women Resv Seat National Assembly Dist Swabi.JPG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bushra Gohar Women Resv Seat National Assembly Dist Swabi.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

page number for Amanullah quote[edit]

Hi, Zakksez. Thanks for your addition to Third Anglo-Afghan War. Do you have a page number of the quote that you added? It would be good to include this in the citation if possible in order to maintain the style the has been used throughout the article. Also, it would help assist readers to verify the information. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 23:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. Thanks for adding that. Have a good day! Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salamoona[edit]

Salam grana, senga ye..? i am very happy to see my pakhtun brothers here in wikipedia. But one thing i didn't like it on your page was, that you are from Pakistan, i have not against Pakistan. But we Pakhtuns are not Pakistanis and would never be. Because we are Afghans/Pakhtuns. and i can approve it to you, to Panjabis and to holl world. i hope you remove Pakistan and set Afghanistan or Pakhtunistan. Thanks and have a nice time here in wikipedia, we will see each others, da khuday pamanTofaan (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zakksez. Are you able to provide a citation for your recent edit noting that North-West Frontier Province is to be renamed? Skinsmoke (talk) 17:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations now located and added. Saved you the job! Skinsmoke (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aredshirt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aredshirt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aredshirt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aredshirt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for Deletion of Article on Safwat Ghayur[edit]

Dear Brother,

AOA,

There is a one time vandal who has nominated the article on shaheed Safwat Ghayur for no good reason. Please vote in favour as well as register your concern against such elements.

Many thanks Brother.

A concerned Pukhtoonm

-- MARWAT  04:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Durrani.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Durrani.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Durrani.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Durrani.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehran Bank scandal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehran Bank scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehran Bank scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 11:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Shujauddaulah.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Shujauddaulah.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adam Khan and Durkhanai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only outside link is a 404

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Closedmouth (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zak I have read some of your articles and find them very interesting, I'm a medical student in the UK and am interested in learning more about Pashtun culture and its history- perhaps you could point me in the direction of some good books? Are you practicing medicine currently? I'm from Manchester also - small world. Many thanks, GS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.32.223 (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GS sorry have no way of contacting you except through my page..be happy to point you in the right direction book wise e mail me on zakksez at gmail dot com In the meantime books there are a few books for free online there is Ghani Khans book the Pathans written circa mid 40s e mail me for more suggestions best ZA Zak (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BritishIndianArmysoldiers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BritishIndianArmysoldiers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Qissakhwanibazaarmassacre.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Qissakhwanibazaarmassacre.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BritishIndianArmysoldiers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BritishIndianArmysoldiers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:March1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:March1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1937 elections[edit]

Dear Sir, Thank you very much for posting informative posts. I learn a lot everyday. You have posted the results for the the 1946 elections, what about the 1937 election results of NWFP. DO u know where those can be acquired? best khalid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.177.249 (talk) 01:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for visiting ..afraid not.. if i do i shall upload them Zak (talk) 11:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Map walledcity.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Map walledcity.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tajbuildin1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tajbuildin1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:March1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:March1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WaliKhan4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:WaliKhan4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Walikhan10.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Walikhan10.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Drkhansahib.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Drkhansahib.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Awk.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Awk.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Walikhan11.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Walikhan11.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Awk.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 12:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nwfp46.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nwfp46.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gillani, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Islamia College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Baburkhel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nwfp46.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nwfp46.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Prince Saiful Malook and Badri Jamala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced; not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians Ottawahitech (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB[edit]

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 13:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zakksez. You have new messages at Talk:Battle of Nowshera.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Peshawar Garrison Club, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Peshawar Garrison Club" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Zakksez! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 1946 provincial elections results.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 1946 provincial elections results.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership Newsletter[edit]

Expand Wikipedia's free knowledge with WDL resources!

Hi Zakksez! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

  • We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
  • Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
  • WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
  • Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yusuf Khan and Sherbano for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yusuf Khan and Sherbano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuf Khan and Sherbano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jennica / talk 09:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuristan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuristan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuristan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Zakksez. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on North 2 North Health Partnership requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AmericanAir88(talk) 20:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Nanasaheb Peshwa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Peshawarlithograph1857.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Muhammadalipasha.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Drkhansahib.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drkhansahib.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]