User talk:Yuyutsu Ho

Welcome!

Hello, Yuyutsu-69! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Walrus Ji (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahasra Bahu Temples

Hello Yuyutsu-69,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sahasra Bahu Temples for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 22:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Tvashtar

If you would like, I can put the speedy deletion criterion G7 on the page, which basically means: "The user who created this page wants it deleted." I just saw your comment on Talk:Tvashtar and decided to let you know about this. You do not seem to want this page here so if you wanted to, as I said above, I could tell the administrators to delete it. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 10:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

@Chicdat: that would be great. Thank you.

Yuyutsu-69 (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Sugata. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@Joshua Jonathan: all the stuff marked with "citations needed" is at Buswell 2013, p. 865.

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mallikarjuna Temple, Srisailam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mallikarjuna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note "exodus" does not mean forced expulsion, only, "The departure or going out, usually of a body of persons from a country for the purpose of settling elsewhere. OED" or "Mass departure, emigration," Webster's Unabridged. Please also note that neither report you cite constitutes a secondary source that WP relies on; in one out of 180 sections, which are mostly about human rights abuses against Kashmiri Muslims, in most instances by Indian security forces, you have picked the single one paragraph section with mentioned the Kashmiri Pandits from the 1980s. That is WP:UNDUE. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 19:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

PS You may take the matter per WP:BRD to the article's talk page and attempt to garner a new consensus. Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 19:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Please note "exodus" does not mean forced expulsion

...which is why I added that it was forced displacement as the United Nations report also states "forced to flee".

Please also note that neither report you cite constitutes a secondary source that WP relies on

A report by United Nations is not reliable?

you have picked the single one paragraph section with mentioned the Kashmiri Pandits from the 1980s.

...because the article is about the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the 1980s.

Or are you implying I should've written that Indian security forces were responsible for that too?

@Fowler&fowler:, Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 08:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Per BRD, please reply on the article 's talk page. Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 08:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 17:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Indian winners and nominees of the BAFTA Film Awards has been accepted

List of Indian winners and nominees of the BAFTA Film Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austin Wolf has been accepted

Austin Wolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malik Delgaty (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malik Delgaty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Yuyutsu Ho! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 11:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian winners and nominees of the Grammy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zakir Hussain. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topher DiMaggio (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Topher DiMaggio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 10:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to The Wire (India), you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 11:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello @ExclusiveEditor, how exactly did I seem to act as if I was the owner of the page? Is it bad manners to ask people why they changed or removed the content I added?

– Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 12:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

You added some content (editorial stance) on The Wire (India) which was challenged, and thus removed. Wikipedia's policy states that there should be consensus about the matter of an article, which I could clearly not see on the talk page. The only user supporting you was User:BlackOrchidd, who themselves are unexperienced or have been editing disruptively in the recent past to say the least. I propose you to remove your content as of now till further consensus is reached. I also admit that just arguing with one user (TrangaBellam) is not going to bring a meaningful discussion and to advance it by inviting other user (without canvassing), and asking questions on WP:Teahouse/ WikiProjects etc. Regards, ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 12:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@ExclusiveEditor which part needs consensus?

According to one of the founding editors, the founders’ basic value is to stand for the right of the individual against the normally overbearing nature of the State. He further added that the founders are socially and economically liberal in their approach. Varadarajan said in an interview that he (and by extension The Wire, as asked in question) in all matters of journalism is guided by the Constitution of India.

In 2020, The Wire joined Progressive International's Wire– a coalition of progressive media outlets from around the world.

As I said in the talk page, that The Wire is a member of Progressive International's Wire is a fact, it's not even primary research. That fact doesn't change even if no sources other than Progressive International (and openDemocracy) report it. Also, the cited journal article contains statements from one of the founding editors. Why would that need multiple sources?

User:TrangaBellam said,

You want to simply mention that "The Wire is a member of Progressive International's Wire"? Sure, go ahead but we need atleast one secondary source to cover DUE. Though the more important question is about its placement under a subsection titled "Editorial Stance".

Hence I removed the 'Editorial stance' subsection, and added other details in the History section.

– Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 12:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topher DiMaggio (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Topher DiMaggio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Blake Mitchell (porn star)

Hello, Yuyutsu Ho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blake Mitchell (porn star), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)