User talk:Yashmon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Steep, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Action Jackson IV 21:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC) oi u look like a sort of geek and all im gonna say is this i added a page to steep coz poeple might want to know what it is so no im not deletin it[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. – Chacor 16:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Runescape wiki. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 14:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Simpsons, you will be blocked from editing. Natalie 09:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Football[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Football. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--FreeKresge 15:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to The Simpsons (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 09:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Gwernol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Xy7 (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2008

January 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Gwernol, you will be blocked from editing. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 14:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um... hello?[edit]

Hi Yashmon, you seem to be attacking my user and talk pages. Would you care to explain why? If I have done something to offend you, please explain what and I will be happy to address your concerns. Blanking my talk page is not a suitable method of trying to resolve any issues you might have with me. Best, Gwernol 14:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know who user Yashmon is. It would seem that he is doing this just for fun, it is nothing personal towards you. Devious Avocado (talk) 20:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Fiat500isdabest has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]