User talk:Xil/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Freedom Monument (Riga)
To get rid of a redlink in this article I have made a stub for the Latvian Ministry of Defence, for which I have used the spelling "Defence" (with a "c"). I mention this to you to make the point that this is not because I am trying to be a British-spelling chauvinist - I have tried to respect the spelling in the rest of the article, which I have just copyedited - but because that is what the Ministry calls itself on its own website. Good luck with your bid for GA status for this article - you have put a huge amount of work into it. HeartofaDog 12:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- O.K. I'm not trying to promote American spelling I'm just more used to it, if ministry uses British spelling then be it. And thanks for wishing luck -- Xil/talk 18:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Latvijas prezidenti
Es domāju, ka tomēr vajadzētu papildināt un vikificēt President of Latvia, kā piemēru varētu ņemt President of Estonia P.S Daži "templates" pēc ierakstīšanas normālajā forma, t.i {{.....}} pārtop par lielu koda daudzumu.
--Mothmolevna ( © ® ) 10:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Corruption
Corruption exists in many varied forms, with political corruption being the most common type referred to, as this dissertation focuses on this stream of corruption as well as judicial corruption, public service corruption, business to business corruption and other main types of this form of abuse.
The Cassell Concise Dictionary defines the term ‘corruption’ as the adverbial form of the noun corrupt; it then very briefly describes eight different interpretations of the word corruption, of which not all will be useful for later use in this work:
The act of corrupting The state of being corrupt Bribery or fraud Moral deterioration A corrupt reading or version Decomposition, putrefaction Putrid matter Misrepresentation—Preceding unsigned comment added by Betsija (talk • contribs)
- Yes, but editing articles to highlight that one is corrupt, especialy if you delete valid content in the process still violates WP:NPOV and makes Wikipedia corrupt. I trust you have best intentions, but you must adhere Wikipedia's policies, if you don't want to get in trouble. And please sign your messages ---- Xil/talk 12:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to apologize for my sloppy edit, mixing up the two institutions and thank you for your corrections. No idea, what made me invent that, really. Best regards, --Gf1961 11:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use image use
I removed two fair use images from your userbox page [1] and you restored them [2]. Please note that Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #9 prohibits the use of copyrighted, fair use imagery on any page other than actual articles. Use on userpages is not permitted. I've re-removed the images [3]. Please do not re-add them or any other fair use images to that page. If you have any questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 19:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, for pointing that out, it didn't occure to me. Since another image I used apparently was deleted and I was replacing it, I got edit conflict and since my mind was preocupied with that image I assumed that your edit has something to do with it (given that I took it from real userbox it most likely was used on plenty userpages) and pasted my content without carefully looking at it, sorry.---- Xil/talk 23:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Oskars_Kalpaks.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oskars_Kalpaks.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Why such accusement?
Hi, Braliukas. I haven't ruined the box - it was classifying falsely Baltic languges, but tryed to correct mistake. You accused me in box ruination. 13:56, 16 July 2007 Xil (Talk | contribs) m (9,796 bytes) (Undid revision 144993243 by 78.62.22.250 (talk)Ruined infobox) Why? This is scientific problem how to classify languages and lots of schollars suppose it to be separated from Slavic enough, but some disagree. So, I expressed opinion of honourable scientists, but not made vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.62.22.250 (talk • contribs)
- Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ~~~~ it makes it easier to follow disscusion and to find you. Now as for infobox - what you changed is classification of languages, it is meant to show to what larger language groups languages in question belong, so by simply changing balto-slavic to baltic you assert that Baltic languages is subgroup of some larger Baltic group, which simply isn't true, thus it is misleading, however, as you seem to be awere, there are several scientists who belive in exsistance of balto-slavic and it is valid and well-known oppinion. So I undid your edit because you made tehnical mistake, which might have been misleading, not because I don't agree with you (but I don't have particular oppinion on balto-slavic as well). I wasn't accusing you, perhaps I should have used different words ---- Xil/talk 19:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but this was then misclasification, but not ruination. Your articles about culture are really nice. I'm interested in Dnepr-Daugava water road influences to Baltic cultures and the most interesting for me is how do there some Lithuanian lakes not far from Daugava obtained... Greek names - even 15 Liminas (limen - lake) and Taramas (wawing in Greek). Herodotos wrote about some Greek emporias - market towns by Dnepr. One of them was Gelonas ecscavated near Vorskla river not far from Kiev. So, I would like to know - how those towns-emporias dissapeared during persian, asian, gothic invasions? Are there some not understandable in Latvian lake names but clear in Greek in Latgala?78.62.22.250 20:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, there are plenty names in Latvia that are not understandable, I don't know greek so I can't tell just by looking in map. If you are realy interested here is lakes of Latgale in tour guide and database of lakes in Latvia, both are in Latvian, but I think you'll get the idea, in the last site there are three search fields on the top - (from top to bottom) first field is exact name (it will sugest you names as you type), second is part of name (so you can enter root you are looking for) and the last one is adminstrative regions---- Xil/talk 14:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
About Latvian military history
If you're the one who expands the WikiProject Latvia, I just thought to ask your opinion if the articles of Voldemars Veiss and 15th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Latvian) should also included into it? I mean, as I'm not an adminstrator myself, I doubt my authority to do those additions.
Läyhä 09:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Found a webpage in Latvian about Voldemars Veiss -http://www.jzb.lv/index.php?1&44&command=detail&recid=1213 . It appears to contain information about his pre-WW2 career, so I thought to ask you if you or someone else fluent in that language could translate it and add that to the Wikipedia article?
Läyhä 09:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Xil, thanks for doing the article I requested. Reading it really made my day! — Zalktis 18:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 28 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Čabulītis, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Peta 12:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Singing Revolution
Some time ago I taged a sentence "Lithuania was the first of the Baltic States where the movement now known as the Singing Revolution appeared." in Singing Revolution article with {{when}} now I see that you have replaced this by a reference. Good, however this is not what was needed - please clerify what date exactly it was, if it is given in your source. You see the article states that in Latvia and Estonia it started in 1987, for example, first open protest in Latvia took place on 14 June, 1987, but first Lithuania-related year mentioned there is 1988 -- Xil/talk 17:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- The source only mentions Lithuania was first, but doesn't actually give a date. So you may need to apply the {{when}} tag. Martintg 05:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Lāsma Kauniste
Thank you for editing my article on Lāsma Kauniste. In my research before writing that article, I also read that her maiden name Avotiņa is not even a Latvian name. I do not know if that is true, but, either way, I did not consider that little fact(?) worth mentioning. However, I did want to ask you about your comment Latvians don't have patronyms and it is not correct russian transliteration anyway. I found her name mentioned in Russian as Ласма Хермановна Каунисте. I guess the "correct" English transliteration of the patronym Хермановна would be Khermanovna. But I am wondering where it came from if Latvians do not use patronyms. Was it something that was "assigned" to her when "Soviet-Russianising" her name? Do you think the Хермановна should be removed from the Russian spelling of her name? Because now, it looks a bit strange since Lāsma Kauniste does not completely correspond with Ласма Хермановна Каунисте. Also, I hope I used the correct Latvian spelling of her name as Lāsma Avotiņa. Thank you. wjmt 15:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: Krišjānis Barons
Thank you very much for pointing this out to me! It seems I have become cynical regarding the content of Wikipedia, like so many others. So much so that I have not even considered that other sites take information from our articles. Thereen 11:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
In this edit, you stated that I had reverted the article to an edition from a year before. In fact, I had not even looked at the history, and I did it by myself alone. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 22:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but then you must have deleted large amount of text wich had similar efect. I think you removed to much of information -- Xil/talk 09:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I may have, but I thought that the parts which I deleted were incoherent and irrelevent. Nevertheless, you know much more than I do about this subject, so I will defer to you. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 23:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Ulmanis monument
Paldies par bildi! I have now incorporated it into the article on Kārlis Ulmanis — which, sadly, needs a lot of other editing as well. — Zalktis 08:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Freedom Monument (Riga)
That is really kind of you - liels paldies!! It's a very interesting article and it was a pleasure to work on it. It was great to see it go through with so little difficulty, and I hope you are proud of it. All best wishes, HeartofaDog (talk • contribs) 22:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
At least it wasn't Zirgupakaļija! Who says that Latvian is a poor language for self-expression? — Pēters J. Vecrumba 23:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Since Wikipedia says "Thank you" so rarely, I present you this shiny bunch of pixels for your fine work on Latvia- and Baltics-related topics. Please keep up the good work. Renata 16:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Xil...sist! 16:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I second the award. Thank you for taking on the task of merging "Baltic republics" into Baltic states! — Zalktis 18:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Kunichika
Thanks, Xil, for your suggestions. I have merged sections, moved images and fixed red links (left over from the original article, I think). Re the Wiki POV, these are not judgments, but historical facts. I do not know how else to state it. There were a lot of Rembrandt students who never achieved their master's greatness. Fact. --Clhowson 14:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Freedom Monument
Hi Xil, I'd just like to let you know that I finished the translation of Freedom Monument (Riga) into Esperanto : see eo:Monumento de Libereco (Rigo). I took the liberty of adding a few pictures and a little section about the euro coin, but basically the whole text is a faithful translation of your own work. I really enjoyed working on it and learning so much about Latvia, so thank you and keep up the great work ! Best wishes, Thomas Guibal 12:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, judging from recently added interwiki links, several new Latvia related articles seem to have been created in Esperanto Wikipedia lately, so thank you (and other Esperanto wikipedians who might also be responsible for that) for your work on Latvia-related articles ~~Xil...sist! 12:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm afraid I really am the only one responsible for this. Be aware though that I proposed Latvia as our next "Country of the month", a common project aiming to create/improve all the articles related to a specific country, because our main article about Latvia is currently very poor. Thomas Guibal 17:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)