User talk:Wphowellco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wphowellco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —PaleoNeonate – 06:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implementations[edit]

The section in-question, "Implementations", appears to be attempting to provide legitimacy to the use of this protocol and not directly related to information about the CMP protocol. It would seem that this section could be eliminated entirely.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wphowellco (talkcontribs) 16:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon

Hello Wphowellco. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wphowellco. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wphowellco|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

I'm not sure how many edits reflect that. I am not receiving or expecting to receive compensation for assisting Wikipedia in maintaining articles. I work for a school district and our teachers do not actually utilize Wikipedia. I personally have relied on Wikipedia, have donated to Wikipedia and am doing this as a way of giving something back. If there are specific issues with how and what I'm contributing, I'd certainly like to hear about them, so I can improve my methods and processes. I have focused on keeping things up-to-date as many articles do not have current data, such as the article on Autism and the Nissan Leaf. Wphowellco (talk) 13:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]