User talk:WilmarisD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


You have an overdue training assignment.[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 03:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, WilmarisD, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


AJ Tavantzis Peer Review MarketingAJ Tavantzis (talk) 00:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[edit]

AJ Tavantzis Peer Review MarketingAJ Tavantzis (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[edit] Hi WilmarisD I enjoyed reading about Marketing and like the way the article was sectioned with the lead section and so on. Your lead section is easy to understand and the information was interesting. I like that you included some different categories for the reader to differentiate. Marketing has many different uses and you included that in the article whether--AJ Tavantzis (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC) it was edited or new to the article it was helpful. Reading about the 4 P's was a good source to put into the article. I understood that well. Some of the five elements were missing , but maybe not the entire article was brought over to the sandbox. I would imagine this has much to much information to be able to do that. I see a clear structure with the headings and categories you included. The information was neutral and informative. I think you will need to cite more information with credible sources so we can follow the links and check the information. I think the article accomplished a good introduction to Marketing but could use some improvement with the structure and balance. Maybe add some of the different perspectives of marketing and what is can be used for. Overall I learned about Marketing from the article and will look forward to more editing. If you could let me know if all was not brought over to sandbox that would be helpful. Some of the information is redundant because of the previous reviews and the statements being mixed in. I think the information can be condensed and made smaller. Thank you AJ Tavantzis --AJ Tavantzis (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)February 26, 2019

You have an overdue training assignment.[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Boothsift was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry, but we don't need to know about how you choose your article entries.
The One and Only Boothsift 01:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WilmarisD! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The One and Only Boothsift 01:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WilmarisD, thank you for your interest in improving this article. But it would be good to discuss such sweeping huge changes on article talk first please. Also, your rewrite completely destroyed the article structure and referencing system. Please do not copypaste raw unformatted text into Wikipedia articles - such copypastes tend to loose all links, references and other vital formatting. If you have questions about Wikipedia editing, please feel free to ask at WP:Teahouse anytime. Editors there will be glad to help. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 07:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WilmarisD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Beansie813/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]